Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Crankset Conversions

Started by David · · Last activity · 2 posts · 380 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
3 February 2006
Last activity
3 February 2006
Original author
David
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
380
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am mid-process [I have the triple cranks and triple front derailleurs
    bought] in changing two mid-1980s roadbikes from road doubles to triples
    to ease hill climbing, but recent posts here have me a little scared...

    I knew I would need new bottom brackets or at least spindles, and
    planned to let the LBS help in getting that right. Both bikes have
    8-speed chains (one is a 6-speed and other is a 7-speed). Both have
    (old) Shimano 600 rear derailleurs. Question #1: Will those rear
    derailleurs likely work with the triple so long as I train the missus to
    stay out of the small-small combos?

    She is more the slow-cadence grinder so the 52/42/30 will suit her. I
    am a spinner and intended to go 45/39/30 or thereabouts. Question #2:
    Will that present any added problems beyond putting the front derailleur
    in the right place?

    Question #3: Would it be easier for me to dump the un-installed triple
    equipment and go to compact cranks? Even getting down to a 34 would be
    an improvement over the existing 42 small rings.

    I understand that the chainring spacing on the triples is different than
    on doubles. Question #4: Since our shifters are friction (I know, how
    quaint) does that matter?

    I wish we could afford two new bikes, but I just spent the equivalent on
    textbooks for the kids in college, so the old bikes will need to get us
    up the hills for 2-3 more years.

    David

  2. David said:

    I am mid-process [I have the triple cranks and triple front derailleurs
    bought] in changing two mid-1980s roadbikes from road doubles to triples
    to ease hill climbing, but recent posts here have me a little scared...

    I knew I would need new bottom brackets or at least spindles, and
    planned to let the LBS help in getting that right. Both bikes have
    8-speed chains (one is a 6-speed and other is a 7-speed). Both have
    (old) Shimano 600 rear derailleurs. Question #1: Will those rear
    derailleurs likely work with the triple so long as I train the missus to
    stay out of the small-small combos?


    '
    Yes...the issue will probably be bog-big combo tho...an artifically too
    short chain to prevent pulley to biggest cog interference when in the
    smallest ring-biggest cog combo.

    Quoted message said:


    She is more the slow-cadence grinder so the 52/42/30 will suit her. I
    am a spinner and intended to go 45/39/30 or thereabouts. Question #2:
    Will that present any added problems beyond putting the front derailleur
    in the right place?

    Nope-

    Quoted message said:


    Question #3: Would it be easier for me to dump the un-installed triple
    equipment and go to compact cranks? Even getting down to a 34 would be
    an improvement over the existing 42 small rings.

    No compact is as low as the 30t smallest ring. All you have mentioned
    will be fine with a short cage rear der. If extreme combos won't be
    good for her, get a long cage rear der, like an inexpensive Deoe or LX
    and that will work fine with all the rest of what you have-about
    $35-$40 or so.

    Quoted message said:


    I understand that the chainring spacing on the triples is different than
    on doubles. Question #4: Since our shifters are friction (I know, how
    quaint) does that matter?


    It's not-same spacing-no problem.

    Quoted message said:


    I wish we could afford two new bikes, but I just spent the equivalent on
    textbooks for the kids in college, so the old bikes will need to get us
    up the hills for 2-3 more years.

    David

    Don't expect a new bike to magically make you climb better. The
    'bicycle' is a very small part of the cycling performance equation.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.