L
LSMike
Guest
On Jul 1, 8:25 am, Tony Raven <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Methinks he wants to be able to argue 'all these experienced cyclists
> > disagree with CycleCraft, so it must be rubbish'. I'm very carefully not
> > replying.
>
> Me too.
>
> --
> Tony
Blimey, not you too?
No, it's more a case of trying to show that if so many experienced and
knowledgeable cyclists can't pick holes in cyclecraft, then that's a
pretty indication that there aren't many there. There were really
only a tiny minority of people I've seen make comments such as "I
cringe whenever I read the words 'primary position'". Personally I
think that's stupid and not paying attention to what the book is
saying, and I'm irked that otherwise sensible people should dismiss
what I think is such a good book without due cause and without any
reasoning behind their comments.
You can see my opinion here:
http://www.cyclecraft.co.uk/book_reviews.html
>
> > Methinks he wants to be able to argue 'all these experienced cyclists
> > disagree with CycleCraft, so it must be rubbish'. I'm very carefully not
> > replying.
>
> Me too.
>
> --
> Tony
Blimey, not you too?
No, it's more a case of trying to show that if so many experienced and
knowledgeable cyclists can't pick holes in cyclecraft, then that's a
pretty indication that there aren't many there. There were really
only a tiny minority of people I've seen make comments such as "I
cringe whenever I read the words 'primary position'". Personally I
think that's stupid and not paying attention to what the book is
saying, and I'm irked that otherwise sensible people should dismiss
what I think is such a good book without due cause and without any
reasoning behind their comments.
You can see my opinion here:
http://www.cyclecraft.co.uk/book_reviews.html