B
Bill C
Guest
On May 25, 5:18 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On May 25, 9:32 am, "Paul G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 24, 5:49 pm, Bill C <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On May 24, 6:51 pm, "Paul G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 24, 12:40 pm, Bill C <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 23, 8:45 pm, "Paul G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 23, 10:13 am, SLAVE of THE STATE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Get ready, the sacrifices will be your's, not his.
>
> > > > > > > ASSBAGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > > > > > Heh heh! So SLAVE BOY- filled up the tank on your clown car lately?
> > > > > > There's nothing to "get ready" for. Too late for the KY, your right
> > > > > > wing pals have jammed that nozzle where it will inflate your assbag.
> > > > > > -Paul
>
> > > > > Calling SoTS a right winger is like calling Pat Buchanan a
> > > > > progressive, and as accurate.
> > > > > Bill C
>
> > > > Nonsense. He's a right winger alright, but what exactly would you
> > > > call him? A "mad dog conservative"? I keep trying to get him to
> > > > emigrate to a right wing paradise like Iraq or Somalia with no govt
> > > > and no taxes, but he doesn't want to put his ass where his mouth is.
>
> > > > I figure he just enjoys complaining about the price of life in an
> > > > advanced country, while enjoying the benefits. A little time in a
> > > > place with no govt would do him good.
> > > > -Paul- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > If anything I'd call him a Libertarian fundamentalist. Totally
> > > something different from a rightwingnut.
> > > Bill C
>
> > Nah. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. You
> > don't see any posts from him ranting about the need to legalize
> > recreational drug use, gambling, and prostitution. It's all right wing
> > stuff.
> > -Paul
>
> Dumbass,
>
> You're not reading carefully enough, or you would
> discern the difference between SotS's politics and,
> for example, those of San Diego Steve.
> Yeah, SotS is president of the Hayek Fan Club
> (http://hetwaghela.blogspot.com/2006/03/salma-hayek-fan-club.html)
> but Bill is correct. He is a libertarian obsessive
> wacko, not a movement-conservative obsessive
> wacko. Calling him a right wing wingnut is
> inaccurate, just like when he calls me a Kommie
> (but he's allowed to call me a Kommie, since he's
> also kind enough to subsidize Chung's training rides).
>
> Ben- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Don't know if you've ever been to Vt. Ben, but that's a perfect
example of how to do Liberal/Libertarian government and leadership
right. I make my Mother-in-Law, who's about as conservative as it gets
in massachusetts. She can't understand how I can't stand Mass., but
love Vt.which is even more liberal.
The difference is that Vt. lives by the "live and let live" everyone
is free and equal, but also responsible for their own actions, and to
the other people of the community. In short, the old school version of
liberalism.
Good stuff here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermont
in this section in particular:
Political
Main article: Politics of Vermont
Vermonters have been known for their political independence. Vermont
is one of four states that were once independent (the others being
Texas, California, and Hawaii). It has sometimes voted contrarian in
national elections. Notably, Vermont is the only state to have voted
for a presidential candidate from the Anti-Masonic Party, and Vermont
and Maine were the only states to vote against Franklin D. Roosevelt
in his second election.
Vermont's unique history and history of independent political thought
has led to movements for the establishment of the Second Vermont
Republic and other plans advocating secession.[64] In 2007, about 13%
of Vermont's population supported Vermont's withdrawal from the
Republic. The percentage who supported this in 2005 was 8%.[65][66]
We need a shitload more old school liberals in this country.
Bill C
wrote:
> On May 25, 9:32 am, "Paul G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 24, 5:49 pm, Bill C <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > On May 24, 6:51 pm, "Paul G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 24, 12:40 pm, Bill C <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 23, 8:45 pm, "Paul G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 23, 10:13 am, SLAVE of THE STATE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Get ready, the sacrifices will be your's, not his.
>
> > > > > > > ASSBAGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > > > > > Heh heh! So SLAVE BOY- filled up the tank on your clown car lately?
> > > > > > There's nothing to "get ready" for. Too late for the KY, your right
> > > > > > wing pals have jammed that nozzle where it will inflate your assbag.
> > > > > > -Paul
>
> > > > > Calling SoTS a right winger is like calling Pat Buchanan a
> > > > > progressive, and as accurate.
> > > > > Bill C
>
> > > > Nonsense. He's a right winger alright, but what exactly would you
> > > > call him? A "mad dog conservative"? I keep trying to get him to
> > > > emigrate to a right wing paradise like Iraq or Somalia with no govt
> > > > and no taxes, but he doesn't want to put his ass where his mouth is.
>
> > > > I figure he just enjoys complaining about the price of life in an
> > > > advanced country, while enjoying the benefits. A little time in a
> > > > place with no govt would do him good.
> > > > -Paul- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > If anything I'd call him a Libertarian fundamentalist. Totally
> > > something different from a rightwingnut.
> > > Bill C
>
> > Nah. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. You
> > don't see any posts from him ranting about the need to legalize
> > recreational drug use, gambling, and prostitution. It's all right wing
> > stuff.
> > -Paul
>
> Dumbass,
>
> You're not reading carefully enough, or you would
> discern the difference between SotS's politics and,
> for example, those of San Diego Steve.
> Yeah, SotS is president of the Hayek Fan Club
> (http://hetwaghela.blogspot.com/2006/03/salma-hayek-fan-club.html)
> but Bill is correct. He is a libertarian obsessive
> wacko, not a movement-conservative obsessive
> wacko. Calling him a right wing wingnut is
> inaccurate, just like when he calls me a Kommie
> (but he's allowed to call me a Kommie, since he's
> also kind enough to subsidize Chung's training rides).
>
> Ben- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Don't know if you've ever been to Vt. Ben, but that's a perfect
example of how to do Liberal/Libertarian government and leadership
right. I make my Mother-in-Law, who's about as conservative as it gets
in massachusetts. She can't understand how I can't stand Mass., but
love Vt.which is even more liberal.
The difference is that Vt. lives by the "live and let live" everyone
is free and equal, but also responsible for their own actions, and to
the other people of the community. In short, the old school version of
liberalism.
Good stuff here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermont
in this section in particular:
Political
Main article: Politics of Vermont
Vermonters have been known for their political independence. Vermont
is one of four states that were once independent (the others being
Texas, California, and Hawaii). It has sometimes voted contrarian in
national elections. Notably, Vermont is the only state to have voted
for a presidential candidate from the Anti-Masonic Party, and Vermont
and Maine were the only states to vote against Franklin D. Roosevelt
in his second election.
Vermont's unique history and history of independent political thought
has led to movements for the establishment of the Second Vermont
Republic and other plans advocating secession.[64] In 2007, about 13%
of Vermont's population supported Vermont's withdrawal from the
Republic. The percentage who supported this in 2005 was 8%.[65][66]
We need a shitload more old school liberals in this country.
Bill C