Cyclist nearly wipes out Clarkson.



In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
> Sleeker GT Phwoar wrote:
> >
> > And I know I'm not a good driver, but hopefully, at least above average
> > which is more than I can say for a lot of muppets I see arround.

>
> That's good. That puts you firmly in the 75% of drivers who think they
> are above average and probably in the 76% of drivers that other drivers
> think are muppets.
>
>

I find the majority of drivers, especially male, who have been driving
for 10 years or more, no matter how many points, or writeoffs they have
produced, think they are actually a good driver, as long as they haven't
been banned, been jailed for a motoring offence, or actually killed
someone.

One ****** at work, served time and a ban for totalling his Celica GT4
(which happens to be what I drive) a few years ago by speeding and
losing it (and you have to go some to lose a 4x4 hatch on dry tarmac) in
a residential street and taking out a passenger coming the other way,
but causing no fatalities.

As soon as his ban was lifted (he applied for an early lifting because
of the prison time to avoid a retest), he went out and bought a Porsche
Boxster that he had been saving for all the time he was banned. And yes
he still drives like a muppet, has no sympathy for his vehicle, and
doesn't get anything fixed until it physically breaks, rather than when
you can tell there is wear and tear.
--
Carl Robson
"Sorry Sir the meatballs are orf"
(The poster formerly known as Skodapilot)
http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
 
"Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> > Which is more dangerous -- an uninsured ****** in a car or the
> > same uninsured ****** on a bike?
> >

> Uninsured ****** on a bike. At some point the car driver is likely to
> have had basic training.


Since the uninsured ****** in the car is also likely to have neglected to
have obtained a licence or to have had his/her licence suspended due to a
demonstrable inability to drive within the law your answer is WRONG.

T
 
Sleeker GT Phwoar wrote:

> Oh I love radial engines.
> practical classics had one (from an aircraft) in a 1930's race car
> that had been built using an aircraft engine. fantastic looking, and I
> imagine sounding 9 cylinder thing.


May we draw Sir's attention to the 1935 Trossi-Monaco GP car?

url:http://www.shorey.net/Auto/Miscellaneous Pictures/1935 Trossi-Monaco =LF=w0998=.jpg

4 litre twin-supercharged 16 cylinder radial two stroke, front wheel drive.
Redefined the word "understeer". Never raced.

--
Dave Larrington - <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/>
You can't have ham!
 
"Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, Tony W says...
> >
> > "Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > > > > What an excellent example of why cyclists need to be tested,

licenced
> > > > > and insured.
> > > >
> > > > Clearly he was tested and licensed as required by law.
> > > >
> > > > What evidence do you wish to submit to suggest that he wasn't

insured?
> > > >
> > > The lack of compulsory need.

> >
> > Yes -- that complies with your prejudice.
> >
> > But what REAL evidence do you wish to submit to suggest that he wasn't
> > insured?
> >
> > Many cyclists are insured through household policies, club membership or
> > separate insurance cover. Estimates suggests up to 20% of motorists

are
> > not insured. Which is more dangerous -- an uninsured ****** in a car or

the
> > same uninsured ****** on a bike?
> >

> Uninsured ****** on a bike. At some point the car driver is likely to
> have had basic training.
>


It's an acknowledged fact by people who know about driving that riding a
bike (pedal and or motor) makes one a better car driver.
 
In article <[email protected]>, Peter B
says...
>
> "Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > Uninsured ****** on a bike. At some point the car driver is likely to
> > have had basic training.

>
> You just can't stop digging that hole can you?
>

What hole? Are you another uninsured cyclist?

Hit and run is the motto of the pushbiker I believe? As well as "red
lights don't apply to me, the pavement is for riding on and I can
always use my feet to brake if the blocks are shot."

--
Conor


"Be incomprehensible. If they can't understand, they can't disagree"
 
In article <[email protected]>, Peter B
says...
>
> "Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > Brimstone says...
> >
> > > Are you really suggesting that all motor vehicle drivers are therefore
> > > properly insured?
> > >

> > Most and nearly all of them have had a driving test too.

>
> Cor! I wish I *knew* as much as you.
>
>

You never will. Your choice of ISP and Usenet client confirms it.


--
Conor


"Be incomprehensible. If they can't understand, they can't disagree"
 
"Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, Peter B
> says...
> >
> > "Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > > Uninsured ****** on a bike. At some point the car driver is likely to
> > > have had basic training.

> >
> > You just can't stop digging that hole can you?
> >

> What hole? Are you another uninsured cyclist?


No actually, I have third party insurance through CTC for cycle riding,
fully comprehensive insurance for my company car, fully comprehensive
insurance for SWMBO's car, fully comprehensive insurance for sailing.
B*ggar-all specific insurance for walking although my home insurance might
cover me for some liabilities.

Not that any of this is your business but seeing as you asked so
nicely....:)

> Hit and run is the motto of the pushbiker I believe?


Is it?
If you say so I s'pose it must be right in the absence of compulsory
evidence to the contrary.

>As well as "red
> lights don't apply to me, the pavement is for riding on and I can
> always use my feet to brake if the blocks are shot."


Hehe, the usual stereotypical ********.

I think you'd get on better with a JCB the way you're going!

Pete
 
"Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, Peter B
> says...
> >
> > "Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > In article <[email protected]>,
> > > Brimstone says...
> > >
> > > > Are you really suggesting that all motor vehicle drivers are

therefore
> > > > properly insured?
> > > >
> > > Most and nearly all of them have had a driving test too.

> >
> > Cor! I wish I *knew* as much as you.
> >
> >

> You never will. Your choice of ISP and Usenet client confirms it.


They're too trivial for me to be interested in.

Pete
 
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:09:46 +0100, Conor said something. I've
forgotten what it was:

[..]

Never mind clueless Clarkson: I watched that again the other evening,
trying to figure out what it reminded me of. I've remembered!

3 once might have beens on top of a hill saying "Fnarr! Fnarr!" as
some one braver (or stupider) than they takes their cheapskate
purchases round a racetrack?

It's Last of the Summer Wine for petrol heads, innit?
--
PacMan
"I've seen a look in dogs' eyes, a quickly vanishing
look of amazed contempt, and I am convinced that
basically dogs think humans are nuts."
- John Steinbeck
 
"Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Hit and run is the motto of the pushbiker I believe? As well as "red
> lights don't apply to me, the pavement is for riding on and I can
> always use my feet to brake if the blocks are shot."
>


It certainly was the motto of the motorist who deliberately knocked my
insured husband off his bicycle by driving his car straight at him. Cyclist
husband on correct side of road, twit hit-and-run motorist on the wrong side
of the road. Police officer in attendance said he is now attending several
of these a week, where the motorist does a hit-and-run.

Cheers, helen s


> --
> Conor
>
>
> "Be incomprehensible. If they can't understand, they can't disagree"
 
Conor wrote:
>
> You never will. Your choice of ISP and Usenet client confirms it.
>
>


Does anyone else detect traces of John Doh in Conor?

Back in your box laddie!

--
Tony

"Don't argue the matter, the difficulties will argue for themselves"
-W.S. Churchill
 
Peter B ([email protected]) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

>> What hole? Are you another uninsured cyclist?


> No actually, I have third party insurance through CTC for cycle
> riding


>> Hit and run is the motto of the pushbiker I believe?


> Is it?
> If you say so I s'pose it must be right in the absence of compulsory
> evidence to the contrary.


>> As well as "red
>> lights don't apply to me, the pavement is for riding on and I can
>> always use my feet to brake if the blocks are shot."


> Hehe, the usual stereotypical ********.


Ah, this is the old "We're 'cyclists', not just 'people on bikes'"
distinction, isn't it?
 
"Tony Raven" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Conor wrote:
>>
>> You never will. Your choice of ISP and Usenet client confirms it.
>>
>>

>
> Does anyone else detect traces of John Doh in Conor?
>
> Back in your box laddie!


IMO more like Matt B.
 
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:09:16 +0100 someone who may be Conor
<[email protected]> wrote this:-

>What hole? Are you another uninsured cyclist?
>
>Hit and run is the motto of the pushbiker I believe? As well as "red
>lights don't apply to me, the pavement is for riding on and I can
>always use my feet to brake if the blocks are shot."


Yesterday I didn't see any cyclists who appeared to think that red
lights don't apply to them or the pavement is for riding on, though
I have seen them on other days.

However, yesterday I did see a motorist who thought that the
pavement was for driving along at relatively high speed in order to
bypass some other motor vehicles that were "causing an obstruction".
In the process she missed me by a few inches. I also, without
looking for them specifically, saw about a dozen motorists who
appeared to think that red lights don't apply to them.


--
David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government
prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000.
 
in message <[email protected]>, PacMan
('[email protected]') wrote:

> It's Last of the Summer Wine for petrol heads, innit?


You mipsellt 'whine'. When Clarkson isn't bragging, he's whining. He
doesn't seem to know any other modes of communication.

--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

'Victories are not solutions.'
;; John Hume, Northern Irish politician, on Radio Scotland 1/2/95
;; Nobel Peace Prize laureate 1998; few have deserved it so much
 
"David Hansen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...

>
> However, yesterday I did see a motorist who thought that the
> pavement was for driving along at relatively high speed in order to
> bypass some other motor vehicles that were "causing an obstruction".
> In the process she missed me by a few inches. I also, without
> looking for them specifically, saw about a dozen motorists who
> appeared to think that red lights don't apply to them.
>


I was walking in Dereham yesterday and as I was on the pavement (immediately
next to a shop wall as opposed to at the kerb) I was quite surprised by the
sight of the front off-side wheel of a single-decker bus appearing a couple
of inches from my left foot. This was followed by the rest of the bus as the
driver took it along a pavement full of pedestrians. Made shopping more
interesting ;-)

Cheers, helen s
 
wafflycat wrote:

> I was walking in Dereham yesterday and as I was on the pavement (immediately
> next to a shop wall as opposed to at the kerb) I was quite surprised by the
> sight of the front off-side wheel of a single-decker bus appearing a couple
> of inches from my left foot. This was followed by the rest of the bus as the
> driver took it along a pavement full of pedestrians. Made shopping more
> interesting ;-)


But will you be reporting it to the bus company?

John B