meehs said:My point wasn't that anyone was "supporting" him. What amazes me is that Millar gets an "well done boy..." from WBT and you remarked on his "superbe performance". The guy is a known doper. If it had been Landis or Armstrong winning the British 4000, he would have elicited no such comments from either of you. You both would've commented on what a dispicable, doping liar they are and that would've been the end of it.
Anytime anyone who has bashed Armstrong, Hamilton, Landis, etc... as a doper and then turns around and applauds another rider who's a known doper, I can't resist the urge to point out the bias. I don't understand how one can condemn a doper when it's someone they don't like and then choose to ignore it when it's someone they do like.
Me? I just understand that most or all of the riders dope and I don't bash on any of them for it. When the sport is clean and it's proven that a single rider is the lone doper, then I'll squawk. In other words you're not going to hear me condemn a rider because they got caught doping. Because that'll never happen (the lone doper thing that is).
OK I see where you're coming from.
I should have qualified it by saying - Millars performance was superb assuming he did it clean.
I'm not a fan of Millars btw.
Did Millar do it clean ?
In my estimation if he is doping now not only is he a bloody idiot but he would also be taking the **** in my view.