General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Dental Dogma and Amalgams

Started by Ta · · Last activity · 4 posts · 570 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 June 2004
Last activity
13 June 2004
Original author
Ta
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
570
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Why is there such a stubborn, dogmatic resistance to the
    abundance of anecdotal and clinical evidence for the dangers
    of amalgams by the dental profession? My dentist of 22+
    years explains it like this: the vast majority of dentists
    are narrowly trained technicians skilled in evaluating and
    performing technical procedures, but not very good at moving
    beyond the notions engrained in them by "the system".
    Dentists are not known for the ability to question authority
    or think critically - it's boot camp for dental
    professionals, and their ideas are gospel. No wonder then
    that the dental profession reacts so vehemently when their
    cherised ideas are questioned.

    In addition, the principles (including those regarding
    amalgams) taught in dental school are deeply embedded in the
    culture of dentistry. Challenging them is akin to
    challenging someone's deeply held cultural or religious
    beliefs. When institutions have this sort of historical
    inertia, change is slow and hard to come by. Egos have a lot
    to do with it as well (nobody likes to be wrong, especially
    scientists).

    He doesn't mean this to be insulting to the dental
    profession obviously, and neither do I. It's a wonderful
    profession that deserves much respect and appreciation, for
    their work is important. And I'm appreciative of the work
    dentists do, even though I disagree about the safety of
    amalgam. His explanation was meant to clarify why it's so
    difficult to convince the dental profession in general what
    more and more people are beginning know (many of them the
    hard way): that amalgams post a serious health risk to human
    beings, and they ought not be used any longer.

    It's not just a scientific issue; it's a philosophical,
    psychological, and social issue as well, and human health
    ought be the top priority here.

  2. "ta" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Why is there such a stubborn, dogmatic resistance to the
    abundance of anecdotal and clinical evidence for the
    dangers of amalgams by the dental profession? My dentist
    of 22+ years explains it like this: the vast majority of
    dentists are narrowly trained technicians skilled in
    evaluating and performing technical procedures, but not
    very good at moving beyond the notions engrained in them
    by "the system". Dentists are not known for the ability to
    question authority or think critically - it's boot camp
    for dental professionals, and their ideas are gospel. No
    wonder then that the dental profession reacts so
    vehemently when their cherised ideas are questioned.

    Sounds like you already got the answer to your question!

    Are you trying to exchange information or bait people into a
    flame war? You have made your decisions, found a group of
    people and a dentist who has risen above his programming to
    tell you just what you want to hear.

    Be happy!

    T

  3. ta said:

    Why is there such a stubborn, dogmatic resistance to the
    abundance of anecdotal and clinical evidence for the
    dangers of amalgams by the dental profession?

    It is possible that we are pid shills for the amalgam
    industry ......

    Quoted message said:

    My dentist of 22+ years explains it like this: the vast
    majority of dentists are narrowly trained technicians
    skilled in evaluating and performing technical procedures,
    but not very good at moving beyond the notions engrained
    in them by "the system". Dentists are not known for the
    ability to question authority or think critically - it's
    boot camp for dental professionals, and their ideas are
    gospel. No wonder then that the dental profession reacts
    so vehemently when their cherised ideas are questioned.

    Does he treat multiple slcerosis by removing amalgams or is
    that Just Hal Huggins?

    Quoted message said:


    In addition, the principles (including those regarding
    amalgams) taught in dental school are deeply embedded in
    the culture of dentistry. Challenging them is akin to
    challenging someone's deeply held cultural or religious
    beliefs. When institutions have this sort of historical
    inertia, change is slow and hard to come by. Egos have a
    lot to do with it as well (nobody likes to be wrong,
    especially scientists).

    He doesn't mean this to be insulting to the dental
    profession obviously, and neither do I. It's a wonderful
    profession that deserves much respect and appreciation, for
    their work is important. And I'm appreciative of the work
    dentists do, even though I disagree about the safety of
    amalgam. His explanation was meant to clarify why it's so
    difficult to convince the dental profession in general what
    more and more people are beginning know (many of them the
    hard way): that amalgams post a serious health risk to
    human beings, and they ought not be used any longer.

    It's not just a scientific issue; it's a philosophical,
    psychological, and social issue as well, and human health
    ought be the top priority here.

  4. Tony Bad said:

    "ta" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Why is there such a stubborn, dogmatic resistance to the
    abundance of anecdotal and clinical evidence for the
    dangers of amalgams by the dental profession? My dentist
    of 22+ years explains it like this: the vast majority of
    dentists are narrowly trained technicians skilled in
    evaluating and performing technical procedures, but not
    very good at moving beyond the notions engrained in them
    by "the system". Dentists are not known for the ability
    to question authority or think critically - it's boot
    camp for dental professionals, and their ideas are
    gospel. No wonder then that the dental profession reacts
    so vehemently when their cherised ideas are questioned.

    Sounds like you already got the answer to your question!

    Are you trying to exchange information or bait people into
    a flame war?

    I'm trying to explain to anyone who might be interested why
    their words fall on deaf ears. Isn't that obvious? And why
    did you clip the positive things I said about the dental
    profession? It was my honest, sincere attempt to *avoid* a
    flame war.

    Quoted message said:

    You have made your decisions, found a group of people and
    a dentist who has risen above his programming to tell you
    just what you want to hear.

    I *want* to hear that amalgams cause illness? Why in the
    world would I want to hear that? In fact, I wanted
    desperately *not* to believe it. Trust me, I tried.

    You have no idea. Let's just leave it at that.

    Quoted message said:

    Be happy!

    I am happy to have rid of the stuff. I'm also very
    concerned, and feel obligated to help others avoid the
    unnecessary trauma that I and many others have gone through.
    I would think that as a person supposedly dedicated to
    aiding human health you would be able to understand that.

    Quoted message said:

    T

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.