General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Did you read this?

Started by Kyrodoc · · Last activity · 4 posts · 453 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 March 2004
Last activity
1 April 2004
Original author
Kyrodoc
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
453
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. DRUG COMPANIES LOBBY TO STOP AID FOR VACCINE-INJURED
    CHILDREN

    May 2002

    We need your help!

    In the early 1980's when doctors and vaccine makers lobbied
    Congress to protect them from vaccine injury lawsuits and
    insure the supply of vaccines, Congress responded with the
    National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
    (NVICP). In passing the law, Congress promised parents the
    federal compensation program would be a no-fault, expedited
    alternative to a lawsuit and provide “Simple Justice For
    Children.” But over the years the spirit and intent of the
    program has been violated through poor implementation and a
    denial of compensation to many of the children who apply for
    assistance with their catastrophic vaccine injuries. Many
    times vaccine injury claims are bogged down for years while
    families struggle to care for their severely vaccine injured
    children or are mourning the death of a child.

    Even though doctors and vaccine makers got what they wanted
    and are shielded from vaccine injury lawsuits, they have
    enthusiastically supported weakening of the Vaccine Injury
    Compensation Program by federal health agencies determined
    to limit the number of awards given to vaccine injured
    children. Apparently, they see each award given as an
    admission that vaccines can and do cause harm and this
    makes it harder for them to promote one-size-fits all
    vaccination policies.

    Now there is a bill pending in Congress, which was
    introduced by Congressman Dan Burton (R-IN) and physician
    Congressman Dave Weldon, M.D. (R-FL) and is being co-
    sponsored by Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) that would
    address some of the serious problems in the Program. HR 3741
    does not fix everything that is wrong with the program but
    it is a good start.

    BUT RIGHT NOW POWERFUL DRUG COMPANY LOBBYISTS INTERESTED
    IN FURTHER VICTIMIZING THE VICTIMS OF VACCINE INJURIES
    AND DEATHS ARE ON CAPITOL HILL TRYING TO KILL HR 3741
    AND INTRODUCE ALTERNATE BILLS THAT WOULD GIVE THEM EVEN
    MORE PROTECTION FROM LIABILITY FOR THE VACCINES THAT
    HAVE HURT CHILDREN.

    Whether you have a vaccine injured child or you know
    someone who does, please take a minute and send a letter
    to your member of Congress and ask him/her to co-sponsor
    this legislation and help move this bill through the
    legislative process.

    On behalf of our members with vaccine inured children, NVIC
    worked hard in the early 1980's on the original law to get
    as many rights and protections for families of vaccine
    injured children as we could. We were up against a very
    powerful vaccine and medical lobby that wanted to severely
    limit the kinds of awards children could get. Since 1986,
    NVIC has been a vocal critic of the way the federal agencies
    have gutted the compensation provisions and compromised the
    spirit and intent of the law. Now we have an opportunity to
    fix some of the problems in this law with the passage of HR
    3741. If this bill passes it will help more children get
    access to the $1.7 billion in the trust fund that has been
    set aside to help vaccine injured children and adults.

    You have the opportunity to make a difference for vaccine
    injured children and their families by personally contacting
    your member of Congress and urging him or her to support
    this bill and by not giving up until they do! Write your
    legislator today and follow-up with a telephone call. Stay
    on the case until you get an answer. Do not accept the
    standard form letter that says, “ Thank you for your
    views. If this bill comes before me, I will keep your views
    in mind.”

    Please help. Here are two sample letters. The first is for
    you to send to your own member of Congress. The second is
    for the Speaker of the House. Check the list below. If your
    member is already a co-sponsor then thank them and continue
    to let them know of your concerns.

    You can identify your member of Congress by calling the
    Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121. Ask to speak to the
    person in your member’s office who is working on
    health issues.

    Constituent e-mail has a better chance of being read than
    general e-mail although many legislative e-mails have a form
    letter that bounces back.

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    KyroDoc said:

    DRUG COMPANIES LOBBY TO STOP AID FOR VACCINE-INJURED
    CHILDREN

    May 2002

    May 2002. Almost two years ago. Hot off the press.

    Great work, "doc."

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
    opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
    have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
    standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  3. Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (David Wright)

    Almost two years ago. Hot off the press.

    Quoted message said:


    Great work, "doc."

    Oh jeez.....So sorry. My mistake. When I said "you" I meant
    "Those of you interested in the vaccination controversy" who
    might have missed a pertinent article.

    YOU must have assumed "you" meant condascending pr*cks who
    disagree with YOU.

    I'll be more specific the next time *dave*

    DC

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    KyroDoc said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (David Wright)

    Almost two years ago. Hot off the press.

    Quoted message said:


    Great work, "doc."

    Oh jeez.....So sorry. My mistake. When I said "you" I meant
    "Those of you interested in the vaccination controversy"
    who might have missed a pertinent article.

    Was it a pertinent article? Given that it was two years ago,
    maybe it would be a little more interesting to find out
    whether the bill mentioned by the article actually passed,
    or was defeated, or what.

    Instead, you give us this screeching thing that's asking
    everyone to write their Congressperson about a bill that was
    relevant TWO YEARS AGO.

    Yer a moron, "doc."

    Quoted message said:

    YOU must have assumed "you" meant condascending pr*cks who
    disagree with YOU.

    The word is "condescending."

    Quoted message said:

    I'll be more specific the next time *dave*

    I'm always so hurt by criticism from wimps who don't even
    reveal their names.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
    opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
    have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
    standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.