Difference between Racing T and Daytona triple groups

[Deva]

Hi

What are the major differences between the Campagnolo Racing T and Daytona/Centeur groupset. Are
there any differences?

thanks deva

 

[Qui Si Parla Ca]

devadip9-<< What are the major differences between the Campagnolo Racing T and Daytona/Centeur
groupset. Are there any differences?

Really no major differences. For 2003, Centaur triple is 10s and the rings are
53/42/30, instead of starting with a 52. In 2002 is was decal differences. Additonally there is a
short, medium and long cage version of the rder for 2003 whereas the racing triple had
short and long.

Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
(54)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

 

[Deva]

Thanks. It seems that the Racing T is not a good value as the Centaur group. Would I be better off
not using the Campy front deraileur if I choose to use a touring crankset and appropriate rings such
as 48-36-26. If I choose to use a 12-30 cassette on the back which cage deraileur should I spec in?

Thanks

On 15 Feb 2003 13:43:12 GMT, [email protected] (Qui si parla Campagnolo) wrote:

>devadip9-<< What are the major differences between the Campagnolo Racing T and Daytona/Centeur
>groupset. Are there any differences?
>
>Really no major differences. For 2003, Centaur triple is 10s and the rings are
>53/42/30, instead of starting with a 52. In 2002 is was decal differences. Additonally there is a
> short, medium and long cage version of the rder for 2003 whereas the racing triple had short
> and long.
>
>Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
>(303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"