E
Edward Dolan
Guest
"LoGo USA" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hey guys-
>
> This is a long post, pretty much just what will probably
> my last posting this year - the end product of notes I've
> popped off - berating the misguided miscreant who still
> stubbornly continues to litter the ARBR archives with
> mean-spirited self-indulgent drivel posted in the names
> of Ed Dolan and nget. Don't waste your time reading any
> further unless you enjoy the humiliation of this sad
> (but very deserving) simpleton. Anyway, here we go again:
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> AWWW-WWW... both sides of the Dolan-nget duality (aka
> DO-NG) are unhappy. While his virtual stepchild nged
> (nget with a dash of Dolan) poor-mouths:
>
>>I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt.
>
> we also get a complaint from the primary ego (aka Edgy -
> I picture him as a squat, sour-faced, toadish old
> curmudgeon, with wrinkled pouty lips, cold fish eyes
> and a dull, quacking voice - sort of like an aging
> Edward G. Robinson playing one of his worst bad boys):
>
>>... calling him [Wayne] the Poet of ****. I wish I had
>>thought of that! ... [nged's] remark... was on the
>>order of genius...
>
> Now that is unfair! Gnoisy gnuisance nged ngets to pretend
> that he has a job, sex with an imaginary wife (at least
> presumably occasionally), that he has not one but two
> (make-believe) trikes much nicer than Edgy's real (or
> imaginary?) ones, and maybe even live in a milder climate.
> So why does the self-professed underdog get to 'think up'
> that absolutely brilliant bon mot [YAWW-WW-WN] which has
> been repeated approximately sixty-seven times to date by
> the dyslexic duo? One wonders just how lacking in both
> intellect and talent we are supposed to think the Edgy
> persona is. He says:
All of the above thus far is unintelligible. Wayne can't write prose. Maybe
that is why he writes verse. I could teach him how to write prose, but why
should I. I think he is happy in his ignorance, and I must confess, I am not
very happy in my wisdom.
>>I am never that inspired although I try to be as equally
>>as truthful [awkward, meaningless phrasing sic] in my own
>>inimitable manner.
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
[...]
>>... since the only purpose of sex is procreation, anyone
>>who is doing anything in that [soccer?] field without
>>that goal in mind is clearly demented and depraved...
>
> Or he barfs up misworded, muddled messes like this:
>
>>I could have said ... [misused ellipsis sic] "Why use
>>a word that no one will know its meaning" [awkward
>>wording - second attempt - sic], but it does not play
>>like how [awkward wording again sic] I wanted it to
>>play.
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
How the hell do you misuse an ellipsis?
> Is it DO-NG's real writer or only the poor Edgy persona
> that does not realize he could meet minimal standards
> for middle school composition by simply saying "Why use
> a word that no one will understand?"
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
> But on it goes:
>
>>I have my style... Communication is of the essence...
>>Repetition is of the essense [sic]... Mr. Dolan is a
>>highly educated person who knows how to use language
>>[BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ad nauseum, ab ovo, ad nauseum, ad
>>infinitum...]
>
> Style? Sad. Communication? No. Repetition? Si, si, si.
> Proper use of first person pronoun when referring to
> oneself? No. Language know-how? Oh, please! Has 'highly
> educated' been redefined to mean 'went to class most
> days and got a mercy C- in seventh grade English while
> striving not to drool all over the swelling bosoms of
> one's pubescent female classmates'?
Wayne is descrbing himself of course. How else would he know about any of
this?
> Herewith, a FREE and much-needed tutorial in creative
> writing - Edgy wrote [all sic, sic, sic]:
>
>>Does anyone but me get the feeling that [NAME WITHHELD
>>BY SPECIAL REQUEST] is constantly resorting to freakish
>>words to impress others by his vocabulary. Unfortunately
>>for him, it is having just the opposite effect. It is
>>something that is done by the half educated who think
>>they have to use big and/or odd words to convince others
>>that they are not really as dumb as they know themselves
>>to be.
>
> While any fairly bright twelve-year-old might write:
>
> Does anyone else feel that Edgy uses freakish words in an
> effort to impress others with [not by] his vocabulary?
> Unfortunately for him, this habit [not it] has the
> opposite effect. Using odd words [again not it] is a
> common practice for a poorly educated writer, as he tries
> to convince readers that he [correcting Edgy's pronoun-
> antecedent error] is really not as dumb as he himself
> knows he is. Edgy should not even profess to understand
> what a modestly educated person has written, much less
> attempt to criticize or emulate it.
Your version is garbage and is as usual unitelligible. There has got to be
something wrong with the way your brain works. Too many drugs maybe?
> But it gets worse:
>
>>By all means go to his [Wayne's] blog, ever the province
>>of scum bags [sic], scoundrels and knaves.
>
> I think a single mouse click will work for most folks; it
> probably isn't necessary to use 'all means'. My link is to
> a simple webpage, not a blog. 'Ever' is a bit overreaching
> for something that's been in existence less than a week in
> the case of my webpage, or only about five years for blogs.
> Isn't 'the province' up in Canada? 'Scumbags' is a compound
> (not com pound) word; 'scoundrels' and 'knaves' are sadly
> pretentious, archaic words. Has this DO-NG guy (who writes
> the scripts for Edgy and nged) had an actual face-to-face
> conversation with a real person anytime in the last twenty
> years or so?
I would never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you.
All blogs have gotten a very bad reputation here on ARBR because of the
criminal vandal troll, or don't you bother with anything else that is going
on here. Wayne is so stupid as not to realize there are many ways of saying
things, all equally correct. What a dunce! My original criticism of him
stands. He is only half educated and doomed to remain that way forevermore.
> More squeaks from the shadow:
Either write in verse or prose. Your half-way measures are off putting to
say the least. Also, try to strive for some consistency of style in your
writing. This present message of yours is a hodgepodge of styles. It makes
one wonder if you even went to college and if so what kind of college. It is
amazing how your verse can make you come across as sounding more educated
than you are whereas your prose exposes you for what you are. Just barely
made it through high school - right?
>>You [Wayne] at this time are the biggest name caller ever
>>to post here.
>
> Wait, I'm confused - is that only 'at this time' or
> 'ever'? And from whom did nged copy his habit of sloppy
> overstatement? 'Ever' is an oddly familiar word, and it
> is such a long, long time. Exactly what parameter(s)
> would we measure to verify nged's 'biggest' claim?
>
> While I can certainly manage to avoid responding to the
> DO-NG twins' thoughtless, pointless, endless repetitions
> of 'Poet of ****' for weeks, it is true that I'm likely
> to coin an interesting (and most often true even though
> unkind) remark or two about a mindless non-entity (aka
> puppet or self-parodying persona) or two from time to
> time here at ARBR.
>
> But when it comes to shotgunning baseless insults (aka
> lies!), to borrow a phrase, "I am the underdog, in that
> there should be no doubt." Since Edgy has historically
> (errantly) referred to the hundreds (maybe thousands) of
> ARBR readers, using about six vile misnomers per post
> (e.g., morons, idiots, cowards) roughly twice a week for
> many months now, he'd be pretty tough to top.
Anyone who has ever been called a name by me should be honored. It is truly
deserved and should be an occasion for the miscreant to correct his
abominable behavior.
>>Nothing up my sleeve
>
> Gnot big gnews, ngolem - gno sleeve, gno arm, gnot a
> real person...
[...]
YAWN! Very tiresome. Wayne is writing for himself of course. Can there be
any doubt? He should try not to be so self absorbed.
Wayne Logo (Leggett), the Poet of ARBR, is not at least making any more
references to **** and cum, so I believe some progress is being made. It is
no good have a facility with words if you have no taste and your mind is
constantly in the gutter.
His post is way too long and only I am bothering to read it I am sure. Wayne
needs to work on being more to the point and not wandering about in a daze
so much. If he listens to me, he will improve his communication with this
group. If he doesn't listen to me, he will end up just writing to and for
himself (a form of onanism). I should really be charging him for my
services.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
news:[email protected]...
> Hey guys-
>
> This is a long post, pretty much just what will probably
> my last posting this year - the end product of notes I've
> popped off - berating the misguided miscreant who still
> stubbornly continues to litter the ARBR archives with
> mean-spirited self-indulgent drivel posted in the names
> of Ed Dolan and nget. Don't waste your time reading any
> further unless you enjoy the humiliation of this sad
> (but very deserving) simpleton. Anyway, here we go again:
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> AWWW-WWW... both sides of the Dolan-nget duality (aka
> DO-NG) are unhappy. While his virtual stepchild nged
> (nget with a dash of Dolan) poor-mouths:
>
>>I am the underdog, in that there should be no doubt.
>
> we also get a complaint from the primary ego (aka Edgy -
> I picture him as a squat, sour-faced, toadish old
> curmudgeon, with wrinkled pouty lips, cold fish eyes
> and a dull, quacking voice - sort of like an aging
> Edward G. Robinson playing one of his worst bad boys):
>
>>... calling him [Wayne] the Poet of ****. I wish I had
>>thought of that! ... [nged's] remark... was on the
>>order of genius...
>
> Now that is unfair! Gnoisy gnuisance nged ngets to pretend
> that he has a job, sex with an imaginary wife (at least
> presumably occasionally), that he has not one but two
> (make-believe) trikes much nicer than Edgy's real (or
> imaginary?) ones, and maybe even live in a milder climate.
> So why does the self-professed underdog get to 'think up'
> that absolutely brilliant bon mot [YAWW-WW-WN] which has
> been repeated approximately sixty-seven times to date by
> the dyslexic duo? One wonders just how lacking in both
> intellect and talent we are supposed to think the Edgy
> persona is. He says:
All of the above thus far is unintelligible. Wayne can't write prose. Maybe
that is why he writes verse. I could teach him how to write prose, but why
should I. I think he is happy in his ignorance, and I must confess, I am not
very happy in my wisdom.
>>I am never that inspired although I try to be as equally
>>as truthful [awkward, meaningless phrasing sic] in my own
>>inimitable manner.
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
[...]
>>... since the only purpose of sex is procreation, anyone
>>who is doing anything in that [soccer?] field without
>>that goal in mind is clearly demented and depraved...
>
> Or he barfs up misworded, muddled messes like this:
>
>>I could have said ... [misused ellipsis sic] "Why use
>>a word that no one will know its meaning" [awkward
>>wording - second attempt - sic], but it does not play
>>like how [awkward wording again sic] I wanted it to
>>play.
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
How the hell do you misuse an ellipsis?
> Is it DO-NG's real writer or only the poor Edgy persona
> that does not realize he could meet minimal standards
> for middle school composition by simply saying "Why use
> a word that no one will understand?"
Inimitable meads inimitable. Who would ever want to emulate your rambling
pathetic style, whether in prose or verse?
> But on it goes:
>
>>I have my style... Communication is of the essence...
>>Repetition is of the essense [sic]... Mr. Dolan is a
>>highly educated person who knows how to use language
>>[BLAH, BLAH, BLAH ad nauseum, ab ovo, ad nauseum, ad
>>infinitum...]
>
> Style? Sad. Communication? No. Repetition? Si, si, si.
> Proper use of first person pronoun when referring to
> oneself? No. Language know-how? Oh, please! Has 'highly
> educated' been redefined to mean 'went to class most
> days and got a mercy C- in seventh grade English while
> striving not to drool all over the swelling bosoms of
> one's pubescent female classmates'?
Wayne is descrbing himself of course. How else would he know about any of
this?
> Herewith, a FREE and much-needed tutorial in creative
> writing - Edgy wrote [all sic, sic, sic]:
>
>>Does anyone but me get the feeling that [NAME WITHHELD
>>BY SPECIAL REQUEST] is constantly resorting to freakish
>>words to impress others by his vocabulary. Unfortunately
>>for him, it is having just the opposite effect. It is
>>something that is done by the half educated who think
>>they have to use big and/or odd words to convince others
>>that they are not really as dumb as they know themselves
>>to be.
>
> While any fairly bright twelve-year-old might write:
>
> Does anyone else feel that Edgy uses freakish words in an
> effort to impress others with [not by] his vocabulary?
> Unfortunately for him, this habit [not it] has the
> opposite effect. Using odd words [again not it] is a
> common practice for a poorly educated writer, as he tries
> to convince readers that he [correcting Edgy's pronoun-
> antecedent error] is really not as dumb as he himself
> knows he is. Edgy should not even profess to understand
> what a modestly educated person has written, much less
> attempt to criticize or emulate it.
Your version is garbage and is as usual unitelligible. There has got to be
something wrong with the way your brain works. Too many drugs maybe?
> But it gets worse:
>
>>By all means go to his [Wayne's] blog, ever the province
>>of scum bags [sic], scoundrels and knaves.
>
> I think a single mouse click will work for most folks; it
> probably isn't necessary to use 'all means'. My link is to
> a simple webpage, not a blog. 'Ever' is a bit overreaching
> for something that's been in existence less than a week in
> the case of my webpage, or only about five years for blogs.
> Isn't 'the province' up in Canada? 'Scumbags' is a compound
> (not com pound) word; 'scoundrels' and 'knaves' are sadly
> pretentious, archaic words. Has this DO-NG guy (who writes
> the scripts for Edgy and nged) had an actual face-to-face
> conversation with a real person anytime in the last twenty
> years or so?
I would never go to a link of yours because I do not trust you.
All blogs have gotten a very bad reputation here on ARBR because of the
criminal vandal troll, or don't you bother with anything else that is going
on here. Wayne is so stupid as not to realize there are many ways of saying
things, all equally correct. What a dunce! My original criticism of him
stands. He is only half educated and doomed to remain that way forevermore.
> More squeaks from the shadow:
Either write in verse or prose. Your half-way measures are off putting to
say the least. Also, try to strive for some consistency of style in your
writing. This present message of yours is a hodgepodge of styles. It makes
one wonder if you even went to college and if so what kind of college. It is
amazing how your verse can make you come across as sounding more educated
than you are whereas your prose exposes you for what you are. Just barely
made it through high school - right?
>>You [Wayne] at this time are the biggest name caller ever
>>to post here.
>
> Wait, I'm confused - is that only 'at this time' or
> 'ever'? And from whom did nged copy his habit of sloppy
> overstatement? 'Ever' is an oddly familiar word, and it
> is such a long, long time. Exactly what parameter(s)
> would we measure to verify nged's 'biggest' claim?
>
> While I can certainly manage to avoid responding to the
> DO-NG twins' thoughtless, pointless, endless repetitions
> of 'Poet of ****' for weeks, it is true that I'm likely
> to coin an interesting (and most often true even though
> unkind) remark or two about a mindless non-entity (aka
> puppet or self-parodying persona) or two from time to
> time here at ARBR.
>
> But when it comes to shotgunning baseless insults (aka
> lies!), to borrow a phrase, "I am the underdog, in that
> there should be no doubt." Since Edgy has historically
> (errantly) referred to the hundreds (maybe thousands) of
> ARBR readers, using about six vile misnomers per post
> (e.g., morons, idiots, cowards) roughly twice a week for
> many months now, he'd be pretty tough to top.
Anyone who has ever been called a name by me should be honored. It is truly
deserved and should be an occasion for the miscreant to correct his
abominable behavior.
>>Nothing up my sleeve
>
> Gnot big gnews, ngolem - gno sleeve, gno arm, gnot a
> real person...
[...]
YAWN! Very tiresome. Wayne is writing for himself of course. Can there be
any doubt? He should try not to be so self absorbed.
Wayne Logo (Leggett), the Poet of ARBR, is not at least making any more
references to **** and cum, so I believe some progress is being made. It is
no good have a facility with words if you have no taste and your mind is
constantly in the gutter.
His post is way too long and only I am bothering to read it I am sure. Wayne
needs to work on being more to the point and not wandering about in a daze
so much. If he listens to me, he will improve his communication with this
group. If he doesn't listen to me, he will end up just writing to and for
himself (a form of onanism). I should really be charging him for my
services.
Regards,
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
