Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Disc brakes

Started by CB · · Last activity · 3 posts · 347 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
8 February 2007
Last activity
8 February 2007
Original author
CB
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
347
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
    it just occured to me.....

    Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
    one is bent?

    Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......

  2. CB said:

    I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
    it just occured to me.....

    Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
    one is bent?

    Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......

    For MTBs, it's hard to wear down a SS rotor down to the minimum wear limit.
    I did a quick search and was unable to find any values for minimum
    thickness. There's a chance, however, that it may be printed on the rotor
    itself, as they are on motorcycle disc brakes. Examine it closely for such
    information.

    --
    Phil

  3. CB said:

    I have XTR disc brakes 160mm. 3 years and several sets of pads later,
    it just occured to me.....

    Should I be replacing the rotors? When does one do so other than when
    one is bent?

    Ideas, comments and flames begin here.......

    I posted this sometime last summer. ...

    One of the former Shimano USA tech reps gave out the the number of .
    20
    mm from the nominal width I believe.

    This is based on the rotor not being out of true or scored, both of
    which tend to end the life of a rotor long before a reduction in
    thickness.

    Also consider that, given the semi-industrial standard (there was
    one?)
    of 2 mm, various rotors seem to run nominal widths of between 1.80 mm
    and 2.2 mm. So knowing what the nomial width that you started with
    would be key. Current Shimano rotors seem to be coming in at 2.0 mm,
    but the older RT75's that I have listed were coming in at the low end
    ....1.8 mm.

    Just for the fun of it here are a few numbers that we came up with
    while doing some brake trials. small n ... 4 rotors measured for each
    average.

    Avid Stainless 1.9 mm
    Aztec Stainless 2.0 mm
    Shinamo SM-RT61 1.8 mm
    Shimano SM-RT75 1.8 mm
    Shimano SM-RT77 1.8 mm
    Shimano SM-RT96 1.8 mm
    Shakamuri Ti 2.0 mm
    Stan's Al 2.1

    R
    What was once old is new again.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.