From: "RB" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 5:03 AM Subject: Re: to Jan > <[email protected]> wrote > > "RB" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "Kim" <[email protected]> wrote in message > > > > <[email protected]> wrote in message > > > > > Jan Drew says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. I > > > > > guess her rules get a lot of relaxing)))) > > > > ================= > > > > She seems to have this obsession that everyone is a > > > > liar. Perhaps we can call it "Secondary Functional Delusional Liarsitosis." It's got to be a miserable way to live. > > > > > > > > ¤ <--- it's caused by this *GASP* fat, round, > > > > parasite! ¥ <--- this parasite causes one to not > > > > practice what one preaches. > > > > > > Are you a Jew? Are you ashamed? > > > > What you are doing, RB, following someone around and > > asking such personal questions, particularly when this > > is a fairly new poster, is harrassment (not to mention > > weird and creepy). It discredits anything of value you > > might have to say, and will likely end you in everyone's > > killfile. Is that where you want to be? > > > > I had not been reading anything you had posted, due to > > your having acted like in similar ways to what you are > > doing here. Now, when I went back through one thread, I > > found that one or two of your posts were or could have > > been quite helpful. But they are lost and/or > > discredited, due to this present kind of troll-like > > boorish behaviour. > > For someone to come into a group and almost immediately > start accusing people of anti-Semitism I think it's only > proper they tell us whether they are Jews or not. 1. No one should _ever_ be required to reveal personal details such as religion or background, on a 'Net discussion group! 2. Not what happened. She arrived after I did, so I saw it. She was presented with certain statements and called them for what they are. When she first arrived she made an innocent remark about how she felt, to effect that she would like to stay out of the personal stuff that's going down. She was followed around and accused of lying, due solely to that statement, which was a mere statement of wish or intention. She was harrassed for that. At that time it was unknown whether she was more "alt" or skeptical. I got the impression that had she turned out to be a female alt, _and_ had she not been prepared to ..co- operate with the established mha alt hierarchy, she would have been harrassed until she was run off. > When this goes on day after day as follows, such as -- > you're a loathsome despicable anti-Semite,you're a liar, There is a list posted elsewhere of "Jews, atheists, and liars"... A list comprised of names which appear to be most of the regualar mha posters. The list includes people who have actually stated they are neither of the first two, and I doubt there is any valid reason to think that all of the others would fit into one or other of the two designated categories. And even if they were all shown to be so, it is very strange to see all the names placed on such a list, and all called "liars". [snip] > So obviously Kim is a Jew manifested by Rich to aid and > abet Rich's stalking of Jan(talk about me stalking Kim!!!) Your choice of word: not mine. I don't begin to follow the above 'reasoning', if anyone could call it that. And I do not wish to do so. Imo it belongs in the realm of needed professional counselling. > but Kim wishes to make it look like she is just a non Jew > sincerely seeking alt answers just so as her pre-ordained > rage, anger and pseudo outrage against their innocent > target would be all the more believable than if she were > an admitted Jew! Thus she doesn't want to let anybody know > that she is a Jew. That is the most extraordinarily convoluted and paranoid thinking. Unless there was something about Kim's first posts that I missed entirely. > Also I hope you don't think that believing that someone or > some group is led by $#t#n is evidence of anti-Semitism? When that group is a 'Net discussion group, it is evidence of psychological ill-health. I believe, serious psychological ill-health.