"JMW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> DZ wrote:
>>>> rick++ <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > Milkk is hard for the majority of adults to digest, except those
>>>> > with European ancestry. One might find if it does give one
>>>> > indigestion outright it might interfere with absorbing other
>>>> > nutrients.
>>>>
>>>> Adult lactose intolerance is quite prevalent among Europeans. Some
>>>> percentages for lactose intolerance for Europeans (Swallow DM
>>>> Ann. Rev. Genet 2003 37:197-219), note gradient toward south and east:
>>>>
>>>> Swedish: 10%
>>>> Danish: 15%
>>>> British: 20%
>>>> Swiss: 30%
>>>> Spanish: 45%
>>>> German: 30-45% (cline toward the south)
>>>> Austrian: 35%
>>>> Polish: 50%
>>>> Russian: 65%
>>>> Italian: 60%-80% (cline toward the south)
>>>
>>> An intolerance to something we were not designed to digest is normal.
>>> Whats the rattlesnake venom intolerance level for the Swiss I wonder.
>>
>>A Swiss wouldn't bother, since it contains neither the calcium or protein
>>that milk does.
>>
>>Keep taking your ephedra, I'll keep drinking milk, ice cream, eating
>>cheese,
>>yoghurt, milkshakes etc.
>>
>>I'll trust organic milk before I trust saccharine, sweet and low, equal,
>>and
>>other non food chemical sweeteners.
>>
>>Do you honestly not consume milk and milk products, cheese etc.?
>
> Do you honestly believe that using the words "non food chemical"
> somehow validates your views?
Just 'cause you eat it, doesn't make it food, or safe.
"Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>"JMW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> "Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> DZ wrote:
>>>>> rick++ <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> > Milkk is hard for the majority of adults to digest, except those
>>>>> > with European ancestry. One might find if it does give one
>>>>> > indigestion outright it might interfere with absorbing other
>>>>> > nutrients.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adult lactose intolerance is quite prevalent among Europeans. Some
>>>>> percentages for lactose intolerance for Europeans (Swallow DM
>>>>> Ann. Rev. Genet 2003 37:197-219), note gradient toward south and east:
>>>>>
>>>>> Swedish: 10%
>>>>> Danish: 15%
>>>>> British: 20%
>>>>> Swiss: 30%
>>>>> Spanish: 45%
>>>>> German: 30-45% (cline toward the south)
>>>>> Austrian: 35%
>>>>> Polish: 50%
>>>>> Russian: 65%
>>>>> Italian: 60%-80% (cline toward the south)
>>>>
>>>> An intolerance to something we were not designed to digest is normal.
>>>> Whats the rattlesnake venom intolerance level for the Swiss I wonder.
>>>
>>>A Swiss wouldn't bother, since it contains neither the calcium or protein
>>>that milk does.
>>>
>>>Keep taking your ephedra, I'll keep drinking milk, ice cream, eating
>>>cheese,
>>>yoghurt, milkshakes etc.
>>>
>>>I'll trust organic milk before I trust saccharine, sweet and low, equal,
>>>and
>>>other non food chemical sweeteners.
>>>
>>>Do you honestly not consume milk and milk products, cheese etc.?
>>
>> Do you honestly believe that using the words "non food chemical"
>> somehow validates your views?
>
>Just 'cause you eat it, doesn't make it food, or safe.
Just 'cause you use the words "non food chemical" doesn't make it
unsafe. Neither does a bunch of uninformed hysteria on health food
moonbat sites.
"JMW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>"JMW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> "Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> DZ wrote:
>>>>>> rick++ <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> > Milkk is hard for the majority of adults to digest, except those
>>>>>> > with European ancestry. One might find if it does give one
>>>>>> > indigestion outright it might interfere with absorbing other
>>>>>> > nutrients.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adult lactose intolerance is quite prevalent among Europeans. Some
>>>>>> percentages for lactose intolerance for Europeans (Swallow DM
>>>>>> Ann. Rev. Genet 2003 37:197-219), note gradient toward south and
>>>>>> east:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Swedish: 10%
>>>>>> Danish: 15%
>>>>>> British: 20%
>>>>>> Swiss: 30%
>>>>>> Spanish: 45%
>>>>>> German: 30-45% (cline toward the south)
>>>>>> Austrian: 35%
>>>>>> Polish: 50%
>>>>>> Russian: 65%
>>>>>> Italian: 60%-80% (cline toward the south)
>>>>>
>>>>> An intolerance to something we were not designed to digest is normal.
>>>>> Whats the rattlesnake venom intolerance level for the Swiss I wonder.
>>>>
>>>>A Swiss wouldn't bother, since it contains neither the calcium or
>>>>protein
>>>>that milk does.
>>>>
>>>>Keep taking your ephedra, I'll keep drinking milk, ice cream, eating
>>>>cheese,
>>>>yoghurt, milkshakes etc.
>>>>
>>>>I'll trust organic milk before I trust saccharine, sweet and low, equal,
>>>>and
>>>>other non food chemical sweeteners.
>>>>
>>>>Do you honestly not consume milk and milk products, cheese etc.?
>>>
>>> Do you honestly believe that using the words "non food chemical"
>>> somehow validates your views?
>>
>>Just 'cause you eat it, doesn't make it food, or safe.
>
> Just 'cause you use the words "non food chemical" doesn't make it
> unsafe. Neither does a bunch of uninformed hysteria on health food
> moonbat sites.
I see that no one will pry your artificial sweeteners from your cold dead
hands.
"Russian Bear" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:56:45 GMT, Big Bill <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>>Well the japs eats human **** for fun,
>>
>>The japs and the Lib-Dems.
>
> If lib-dems ate ****, there'd be no republicans left.
No, most Republicans are much lower than human ****.
WillBrink wrote:
> In article <cWaFf.63878$7l4.4445@trnddc05>,
> "Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Just 'cause you eat it, doesn't make it food, or safe.
>
>
> And just 'cause it's "natural" does not make it safe either.
>
And just 'cause it's safe doesn't mean you should eat it, neither...
Awful Knopfel wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > DZ wrote:
> >> rick++ <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Milkk is hard for the majority of adults to digest, except those
> >> > with European ancestry. One might find if it does give one
> >> > indigestion outright it might interfere with absorbing other
> >> > nutrients.
> >>
> >> Adult lactose intolerance is quite prevalent among Europeans. Some
> >> percentages for lactose intolerance for Europeans (Swallow DM
> >> Ann. Rev. Genet 2003 37:197-219), note gradient toward south and east:
> >>
> >> Swedish: 10%
> >> Danish: 15%
> >> British: 20%
> >> Swiss: 30%
> >> Spanish: 45%
> >> German: 30-45% (cline toward the south)
> >> Austrian: 35%
> >> Polish: 50%
> >> Russian: 65%
> >> Italian: 60%-80% (cline toward the south)
> >
> > An intolerance to something we were not designed to digest is normal.
> > Whats the rattlesnake venom intolerance level for the Swiss I wonder.
>
> A Swiss wouldn't bother, since it contains neither the calcium or protein
> that milk does.
>
> Keep taking your ephedra, I'll keep drinking milk, ice cream, eating cheese,
> yoghurt, milkshakes etc.
>
> I'll trust organic milk before I trust saccharine, sweet and low, equal, and
> other non food chemical sweeteners.
>
> Do you honestly not consume milk and milk products, cheese etc.?
I try to avoid it as best I can. There are plenty of other sources for
calcium and protien. And I never said artificial sweetners were good
either.
Keep drinking the milk. It's amazing what a good strong propaganda
campaign can do...
WillBrink <WillBrink*NOSPAM*@Comcast.net> wrote:
> "Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Just 'cause you eat it, doesn't make it food, or safe.
>
>And just 'cause it's "natural" does not make it safe either.
You should remember Betty Martini, right, Will? I think we have a
clone here.
I just noticed that Martini got some university to award her an
*honorary* doctorate of humanities. Therefore, she now feels that she
can call herself "Dr. Betty Martini."
In article <[email protected]>,
JMW <[email protected]> wrote:
> WillBrink <WillBrink*NOSPAM*@Comcast.net> wrote:
> > "Awful Knopfel" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Just 'cause you eat it, doesn't make it food, or safe.
> >
> >And just 'cause it's "natural" does not make it safe either.
>
> You should remember Betty Martini, right, Will? I think we have a
> clone here.
>
> I just noticed that Martini got some university to award her an
> *honorary* doctorate of humanities. Therefore, she now feels that she
> can call herself "Dr. Betty Martini."
>
> Kinda makes ya wanna puke, huh?
"WooferBearATL" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Russian Bear" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:56:45 GMT, Big Bill <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>>Well the japs eats human **** for fun,
> >>
> >>The japs and the Lib-Dems.
> >
> > If lib-dems ate ****, there'd be no republicans left.
>
> No, most Republicans are much lower than human ****.
You don't like them, because they don't tolerate faggots.
"John" <[email protected]> > You don't like them, because they
don't tolerate faggots.
>
>
Nobody wants to talk about all the cum-slurping bodybuilders in the history
of the IFBB? I hear Chris Dickerson was a major mo.
