C
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
And this is the best she has ever looked.
And this is the best she has ever looked.
Do we have a Tammy Thomas situation?
- Thread starter [email protected]
- Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
W
William Asher
Guest
wrote:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_
> pres/IMG_0150
>
> And this is the best she has ever looked.
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
http://tinyurl.com/d9p5n
It's a Hegelian synthesis thing. Roll with it.
--
Bill Asher
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_
> pres/IMG_0150
>
> And this is the best she has ever looked.
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
http://tinyurl.com/d9p5n
It's a Hegelian synthesis thing. Roll with it.
--
Bill Asher
K
Kyle Legate
Guest
William Asher wrote:
> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_
>>pres/IMG_0150
>>
>>And this is the best she has ever looked.
>>
>>
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
>
Ugh, I'm gonna have nightmares again.
> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_
>>pres/IMG_0150
>>
>>And this is the best she has ever looked.
>>
>>
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
>
Ugh, I'm gonna have nightmares again.
T
Tom Kunich
Guest
"Kyle Legate" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> William Asher wrote:
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>>>
>>>And this is the best she has ever looked.
>>
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
>>
> Ugh, I'm gonna have nightmares again.
I assume that's because you just realized that even women look more
masculine than you do.
news:[email protected]...
> William Asher wrote:
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>>>
>>>And this is the best she has ever looked.
>>
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
>>
> Ugh, I'm gonna have nightmares again.
I assume that's because you just realized that even women look more
masculine than you do.
M
Me
Guest
On 1/16/06 10:18 AM, in article [email protected],
"William Asher" <[email protected]> wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_
>> pres/IMG_0150
>>
>> And this is the best she has ever looked.
>>
>>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
>
> http://tinyurl.com/d9p5n
>
> It's a Hegelian synthesis thing. Roll with it.
http://www.odhbikes.com/images/thomas_thomas2.jpg
http://www.odhbikes.com/Tammy_Thomas.html
"William Asher" <[email protected]> wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_
>> pres/IMG_0150
>>
>> And this is the best she has ever looked.
>>
>>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9tk3e
>
> http://tinyurl.com/d9p5n
>
> It's a Hegelian synthesis thing. Roll with it.
http://www.odhbikes.com/images/thomas_thomas2.jpg
http://www.odhbikes.com/Tammy_Thomas.html
R
ronaldo_jeremiah
Guest
Is this some kind of an insult? Because I can honestly say, without
feeling insulted or impugning my masculinity, that I would be concerned
if women looked more masculine than I do. Think about it.
What kind of nightmares do you have, Tom?
-RJ
feeling insulted or impugning my masculinity, that I would be concerned
if women looked more masculine than I do. Think about it.
What kind of nightmares do you have, Tom?
-RJ
W
white dome trail 94575
Guest
B
Bob Schwartz
Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>
> And this is the best she has ever looked.
OK, what *I* want to speculate on is how Mari Holden still
has a spot on the team. Never has anyone accomplished so
little for so long and still managed to keep a job in the
sport. OK, maybe Berzin did. But that's not a high standard.
My speculation is that it has something to do with being a
FoT (Friend of Thom).
Bob Schwartz
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>
> And this is the best she has ever looked.
OK, what *I* want to speculate on is how Mari Holden still
has a spot on the team. Never has anyone accomplished so
little for so long and still managed to keep a job in the
sport. OK, maybe Berzin did. But that's not a high standard.
My speculation is that it has something to do with being a
FoT (Friend of Thom).
Bob Schwartz
T
Tom Kunich
Guest
"ronaldo_jeremiah" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Is this some kind of an insult? Because I can honestly say, without
> feeling insulted or impugning my masculinity, that I would be concerned
> if women looked more masculine than I do. Think about it.
>
> What kind of nightmares do you have, Tom?
Do you suppose you could have made a more stupid posting?
news:[email protected]...
> Is this some kind of an insult? Because I can honestly say, without
> feeling insulted or impugning my masculinity, that I would be concerned
> if women looked more masculine than I do. Think about it.
>
> What kind of nightmares do you have, Tom?
Do you suppose you could have made a more stupid posting?
R
ronaldo_jeremiah
Guest
Probably not, but then I haven't been at this as long as you have Tom.
Do you have any pointers for me?
-RJ
Do you have any pointers for me?
-RJ
B
Bill C
Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>
> And this is the best she has ever looked.
Dude, since you don't find her attractive you link her with one of the
very few people to ever get a lifetime ban from USAC for doping and
take cheap shots at something she had absolutely no control over, her
genetics. What's next ragging on Special Olympians with Downs syndrome?
You are such a hypocrite.
Bill C
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>
> And this is the best she has ever looked.
Dude, since you don't find her attractive you link her with one of the
very few people to ever get a lifetime ban from USAC for doping and
take cheap shots at something she had absolutely no control over, her
genetics. What's next ragging on Special Olympians with Downs syndrome?
You are such a hypocrite.
Bill C
M
MagillaGorilla
Guest
Bob Schwartz wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>>
>>
>> And this is the best she has ever looked.
>
>
> OK, what *I* want to speculate on is how Mari Holden still
> has a spot on the team. Never has anyone accomplished so
> little for so long and still managed to keep a job in the
> sport. OK, maybe Berzin did. But that's not a high standard.
>
> My speculation is that it has something to do with being a
> FoT (Friend of Thom).
>
> Bob Schwartz
Wiesel has nothing to do with T-Mobile.
Mari is still milking her silver medal at Sydney and her world
championships in that same year (even though we all know Leontien van
Moorsel was the real world champion in 2000).
Magilla
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2006/news/jan06/t-mobile_pres/IMG_0150
>>
>>
>> And this is the best she has ever looked.
>
>
> OK, what *I* want to speculate on is how Mari Holden still
> has a spot on the team. Never has anyone accomplished so
> little for so long and still managed to keep a job in the
> sport. OK, maybe Berzin did. But that's not a high standard.
>
> My speculation is that it has something to do with being a
> FoT (Friend of Thom).
>
> Bob Schwartz
Wiesel has nothing to do with T-Mobile.
Mari is still milking her silver medal at Sydney and her world
championships in that same year (even though we all know Leontien van
Moorsel was the real world champion in 2000).
Magilla
C
What do you think "tammy thomas situation" means? It isn't JUST that I
don't find her attractive. Her body, face, etc look to me to be
artifically manlike. If I am wrong, I am an ignorant dope-accuser, but
not a hypocrite.
Go back to what you like to do: talking **** about topics that have
NOTHING to do with cycling on a CYCLING newsgroup. Oh also go post some
pictures of kids you think are fat; it's been a while since you've done
that.
don't find her attractive. Her body, face, etc look to me to be
artifically manlike. If I am wrong, I am an ignorant dope-accuser, but
not a hypocrite.
Go back to what you like to do: talking **** about topics that have
NOTHING to do with cycling on a CYCLING newsgroup. Oh also go post some
pictures of kids you think are fat; it's been a while since you've done
that.
B
Bill C
Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> What do you think "tammy thomas situation" means? It isn't JUST that I
> don't find her attractive. Her body, face, etc look to me to be
> artifically manlike. If I am wrong, I am an ignorant dope-accuser, but
> not a hypocrite.
>
> Go back to what you like to do: talking **** about topics that have
> NOTHING to do with cycling on a CYCLING newsgroup. Oh also go post some
> pictures of kids you think are fat; it's been a while since you've done
> that.
Dumbass
The pics of kids I linked to were fat! I don't make **** up.
You apologized yet?
Sent any smallpox blankets along recently?
Bill C
> What do you think "tammy thomas situation" means? It isn't JUST that I
> don't find her attractive. Her body, face, etc look to me to be
> artifically manlike. If I am wrong, I am an ignorant dope-accuser, but
> not a hypocrite.
>
> Go back to what you like to do: talking **** about topics that have
> NOTHING to do with cycling on a CYCLING newsgroup. Oh also go post some
> pictures of kids you think are fat; it's been a while since you've done
> that.
Dumbass
The pics of kids I linked to were fat! I don't make **** up.
You apologized yet?
Sent any smallpox blankets along recently?
Bill C
B
Bill C
Guest
[email protected] wrote:
> What do you think "tammy thomas situation" means? It isn't JUST that I
> don't find her attractive. Her body, face, etc look to me to be
> artifically manlike. If I am wrong, I am an ignorant dope-accuser, but
> not a hypocrite.
>
> Go back to what you like to do: talking **** about topics that have
> NOTHING to do with cycling on a CYCLING newsgroup. Oh also go post some
> pictures of kids you think are fat; it's been a while since you've done
> that.
So you were just choosing to involve yourself in a little bit of
libel?
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/libel
1.
a. A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that
damages a person's reputation.
b. The act of presenting such material to the public.
Which part of your **** do you have proof of?
Scumbag!
Bill C
> What do you think "tammy thomas situation" means? It isn't JUST that I
> don't find her attractive. Her body, face, etc look to me to be
> artifically manlike. If I am wrong, I am an ignorant dope-accuser, but
> not a hypocrite.
>
> Go back to what you like to do: talking **** about topics that have
> NOTHING to do with cycling on a CYCLING newsgroup. Oh also go post some
> pictures of kids you think are fat; it's been a while since you've done
> that.
So you were just choosing to involve yourself in a little bit of
libel?
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/libel
1.
a. A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that
damages a person's reputation.
b. The act of presenting such material to the public.
Which part of your **** do you have proof of?
Scumbag!
Bill C
Similar threads
F
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 386
W
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 374
B
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 599
D