Absolutely. What is almost as fun as a good ride. Analyzing your performance data on your computer when you get home. That is my primary reason at this point. Maybe at some point in the future it will be to improve my performance. But I am not that advanced yet.szbert said:HRMs are pretty popular. Do you use one?
Wally said:I use one all the time althought I dont really look at it much during a race. I moniter it a real lot during training rides. Its good to see my fitness level improve over the season. I also use it while on the rollers in the winter.
Hey wyllisx2, small world I used to live in Manchester CT
Weisse Luft said:I used to monitor my performance by HR alone. This led to some protracted muscle soreness as I would pound away in a too steep gear, trying to get my HR up.
Now that I have gone to HR + power (Polar Power), I find I am more focused on power output and maintaining this at constant levels than HR. I recover quicker and also find out my gearing isn't sufficient for some of the steeper hills (or I need more muscle mass, cannot stand to lose any weight).
I am going about 280 Watts average for 100 mile events.
I finally figured out that going out and riding as hard as I could every time isn't the best way to train. It helps me keep my heart rate down on easy days and I have found that percieved effort isn't the best indication of heart rate. Edwin Moses the great 400 intermediate hurdler in the 80's was the first person I heard of using the heart rate zone training and it worked well for him. He won about 80 races in a row.szbert said:HRMs are pretty popular. Do you use one?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.