T
Tony Raven
Guest
George Leroy Tyrebiter, Jr. wrote:
>
> Was contamination of one person's sample with anothers possible given
> the lab procedures used? I residue in the testing equipment? False
> positives?
>
> Remember the countless false positives showing chemicals at various
> sites in Iraq? Which on more refined testing proved to have been only
> "false positives?"
>
I spent a couple of hours at a US airport after my luggage has tested
positive for explosives residues. Eventually the big boss came down,
did a complete wipe down of the work area and equipment, did the tests
again and they came up clean.
--
Tony
"I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't"
Anon
>
> Was contamination of one person's sample with anothers possible given
> the lab procedures used? I residue in the testing equipment? False
> positives?
>
> Remember the countless false positives showing chemicals at various
> sites in Iraq? Which on more refined testing proved to have been only
> "false positives?"
>
I spent a couple of hours at a US airport after my luggage has tested
positive for explosives residues. Eventually the big boss came down,
did a complete wipe down of the work area and equipment, did the tests
again and they came up clean.
--
Tony
"I did make a mistake once - I thought I'd made a mistake but I hadn't"
Anon