C
Carole
Guest
"Orac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news
[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Carole" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "DRCEEPHD" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:20040117223703.04510.00000172@mb-
> > m10.aol.com...
> >
> > > Get a clue. You know nothing except what your brainwased mind allows you
> > to
> > > believe. I do not believe that you have ever read and studied the work of Be'champ
> > or
> > > Enderlein. And what about Rosenow who proved once again in 1914 that bacteria are pleomorphic
> > > and not monomorphic as your germ theory of disease demands?
> > This
> > > Nobel Prize winner proved beyond scientific doubt that staph germs and
> > strep
> > > germs were one and the same. All you had to do was change their food.
> > You
> > > will find that data in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. Your Journal.
> > Your
> > > data. And you are ignorant of it.
> > >
> > > DrC PhD.
>
> >
> > And people don't believe in conspiracies!! What do you call this?
> >
> > Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/media.htm
>
> I call it paranoid conspiracy-theory drivel, actually. And I call DRCEPHD ignorant and unable to
> back up his own claims, given that there is no Nobel Prize winner named Rosenow in medicine,
> biology, or any other discipline for which Nobel Prizes are given. Don't believe me? Check out
> http://www.nobel.se/ and search for Rosenow's name in the list of Nobel Prize winners. And I call
> you gullible, given that you didn't bother to check his claim for accuracy before coming to his
> defense. This is particularly sad, given that the post to which you responded is pretty old, and
> it was pointed out by me and others in responses to the post that Rosenow never won a Nobel Prize
> for the work described or for any other work.
>
> --
> Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> |
> |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
Sorry, I'm accustomed to Drceephd usually being right and didn't check. Of course it was Dr. Otto
Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1931 and again in 1944 for discovering the cause of cancer.
But Rosenow did a lot of the groundwork.
So if the cause of cancer is lack of oxygen to the cells, and Warburg got a Nobel prize for
discovering it, how come conventional treatment is chemo, slash and burn instead of upping the
oxygen level in the cells?
That's the conspiracy and as usual you miss the point.
The Cause of Cancer http://users.tpg.com.au/ronaldt/pressmanO3.html
Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/soil.htm Since my paranoid shift, whenever I hear the
words "conspiracy theory" (which seems more often, lately) it usually means someone is getting too
close to the truth. --Michael Hasty
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/011004Hasty/011004hasty.html
news
[email protected]...> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Carole" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "DRCEEPHD" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:20040117223703.04510.00000172@mb-
> > m10.aol.com...
> >
> > > Get a clue. You know nothing except what your brainwased mind allows you
> > to
> > > believe. I do not believe that you have ever read and studied the work of Be'champ
> > or
> > > Enderlein. And what about Rosenow who proved once again in 1914 that bacteria are pleomorphic
> > > and not monomorphic as your germ theory of disease demands?
> > This
> > > Nobel Prize winner proved beyond scientific doubt that staph germs and
> > strep
> > > germs were one and the same. All you had to do was change their food.
> > You
> > > will find that data in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. Your Journal.
> > Your
> > > data. And you are ignorant of it.
> > >
> > > DrC PhD.
>
> >
> > And people don't believe in conspiracies!! What do you call this?
> >
> > Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/media.htm
>
> I call it paranoid conspiracy-theory drivel, actually. And I call DRCEPHD ignorant and unable to
> back up his own claims, given that there is no Nobel Prize winner named Rosenow in medicine,
> biology, or any other discipline for which Nobel Prizes are given. Don't believe me? Check out
> http://www.nobel.se/ and search for Rosenow's name in the list of Nobel Prize winners. And I call
> you gullible, given that you didn't bother to check his claim for accuracy before coming to his
> defense. This is particularly sad, given that the post to which you responded is pretty old, and
> it was pointed out by me and others in responses to the post that Rosenow never won a Nobel Prize
> for the work described or for any other work.
>
> --
> Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> |
> |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
Sorry, I'm accustomed to Drceephd usually being right and didn't check. Of course it was Dr. Otto
Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1931 and again in 1944 for discovering the cause of cancer.
But Rosenow did a lot of the groundwork.
So if the cause of cancer is lack of oxygen to the cells, and Warburg got a Nobel prize for
discovering it, how come conventional treatment is chemo, slash and burn instead of upping the
oxygen level in the cells?
That's the conspiracy and as usual you miss the point.
The Cause of Cancer http://users.tpg.com.au/ronaldt/pressmanO3.html
Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/soil.htm Since my paranoid shift, whenever I hear the
words "conspiracy theory" (which seems more often, lately) it usually means someone is getting too
close to the truth. --Michael Hasty
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/011004Hasty/011004hasty.html