Dork identity?



Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Richard Burton

Guest
While cycling around Chew Valley Lake this afternoon, just south of Bristol, on the CTC ride, we
were harassed by two dorks in a Jeep, R746 PPY, for not riding on the abysmal cycle track. The
driver sounded his horn continuously, the passenger leaned out of the window and shouted abuse, so
we stopped across the road, forcing them to stop, and I took their picture.

Neither the passenger nor driver appear to be acquainted with the relevant road laws: a cyclist may
use a cycle track, but has every right to remain on the road, and they appear not to know that cycle
tracks have a higher accident rate than riding on the road.

They did appear to consider that they had the right to insist that cyclists should use substandard,
dangerous and inconvenient cycle tracks, and were more than willing to demonstrate their
incomptetence and arrogance by behaving like complete cretins.

If you know either of these morons, a polite word in their ear might save them a lot of hassle later
in life: something along the lines of "you are complete idiots, try and grow up before you drive a
lethal weapon again." should suffice.

Rich
 
D

Dave

Guest
"Richard Burton" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> While cycling around Chew Valley Lake this afternoon, just south of
Bristol,
> on the CTC ride, we were harassed by two dorks in a Jeep, R746 PPY, for
not
> riding on the abysmal cycle track. The driver sounded his horn continuously, the passenger leaned
> out of the window and shouted abuse, so we stopped across the road, forcing them to stop, and I
> took their
picture.
>
> Neither the passenger nor driver appear to be acquainted with the relevant road laws: a cyclist
> may use a cycle track, but has every right to remain
on
> the road, and they appear not to know that cycle tracks have a higher accident rate than riding on
> the road.
>
> They did appear to consider that they had the right to insist that
cyclists
> should use substandard, dangerous and inconvenient cycle tracks, and were more than willing to
> demonstrate their incomptetence and arrogance by behaving like complete cretins.
>
> If you know either of these morons, a polite word in their ear might save them a lot of hassle
> later in life: something along the lines of "you are complete idiots, try and grow up before you
> drive a lethal weapon again." should suffice.
>
> Rich
>
>
Report their actions to the police. I am sure they will be interested to know that these
individuals are driving but not familiar with the highway code.....'course, 'spose I could be
wrong, but it's got to be worth a shot. I think the police are obliged to investigate ?.....anyone
?.... cheers, Dave.
 
T

Tony W

Guest
"Richard Burton" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> While cycling around Chew Valley Lake this afternoon, just south of
Bristol,
> on the CTC ride, we were harassed by two dorks in a Jeep, R746 PPY,

snip

I suppose it is too much to expect that they should have been 'off road'. Isn't a jeep an 'off
road' vehicle??

T
 
R

Richard Keating

Guest
In message <[email protected]>, Richard Burton
<[email protected]> writes
>While cycling around Chew Valley Lake this afternoon, just south of Bristol, on the CTC ride, we
>were harassed by two dorks in a Jeep, R746 PPY, for not riding on the abysmal cycle track. The
>driver sounded his horn continuously, the passenger leaned out of the window and shouted abuse, so
>we stopped across the road, forcing them to stop, and I took their picture.

You may be able to find out more, if your motivation is good enough. From
http://www.dvla.gov.uk/vehicles/relinfo.htm:

"Release of another vehicle’s keeper details

You can obtain the name and address of the registered keeper of a vehicle if you can show reasonable
cause for needing the information.

Members of the public will need to complete form V888. Companies should complete form VQ3 , or apply
in writing (both forms are available from DVLA). You should include a fee of £2.50, the vehicle
registration number of the vehicle you are requesting information on, full reason for your request
and the date of event.

Send your application to: Vehicle Record Enquiries, Vehicle Customer Services, DVLA, Swansea
SA99 1AJ."

If you fancy giving it a try, I'm sure that the list would be interested to know what happens.

--
Richard Keatinge

http://www.keatinge.net
 
P

Pete Boyall

Guest
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 20:52:34 +0000, Richard Keatinge
<[email protected]> wrote:

<snip>
>"Release of another vehicle’s keeper details
>
>You can obtain the name and address of the registered keeper of a vehicle if you can show
>reasonable cause for needing the information.
>
>Members of the public will need to complete form V888. Companies should complete form VQ3 , or
>apply in writing (both forms are available from DVLA). You should include a fee of £2.50, the
>vehicle registration number of the vehicle you are requesting information on, full reason for your
>request and the date of event.
>
>Send your application to: Vehicle Record Enquiries, Vehicle Customer Services, DVLA, Swansea
>SA99 1AJ."
>
>If you fancy giving it a try, I'm sure that the list would be interested to know what happens.
>
I tried this once. You have to have a *really* good reason, along the lines of being knocked off,
losing a limb, driver legging it and the police not attending the scene.

But, you don't ask you don't get.

pete

--

Pete
 
R

Richard Burton

Guest
"Thornbury South Gloucestershire" <jsbr12499 @blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I don't suppose that you as a CTC gang, were spread out across the road? John.
>
> John, Pauline & Hannah. Thornbury, South Gloucestershire. UK. http://www.pbase.com/john28july
>
Yes, of course we were: it's actually a technique we adopted from spiders. One person rides on the
extreme right of the road, and another rides on the extreme left, and between them they hold a
monofilament net, cos the drivers can 't see that can they.

When they drive into our net, we truss up the 4x4, take all their money and credit cards and pour
anti-freeze into the engine.

CTC gang? what a cretin, and I apologise for the politeness. This guy has never been on a CTC ride,
or any organised club ride.

What do you plan to be when you grow up John? A human being?

Do you by any chance drive a Jeep?

Rich
 

ChrisW

New Member
Mar 17, 2003
32
0
0
An interesting behavioual aspect of this is your dorks' sense of invulnerability.

I assume that there were more than two cyclists on this CTC ride, it's a fair bet that people who cycle in their spare time are fitter than those who ride around in jeeps, and I've found in the past that an hour or so of vigorous excercise can shorten one's fuse alarmingly. But these two dorks seem not to have considered the possibility that this numerically superior group of fit people might simply get off their bikes and beat them up, presumably because they were in a car and you were on bikes.

Not, of course, that I'm advocating beating up motorists.

Chris

Originally posted by Richard Burton
While cycling around Chew Valley Lake this afternoon, just south of Bristol, on the CTC ride, we
were harassed by two dorks in a Jeep, R746 PPY, for not riding on the abysmal cycle track. The
driver sounded his horn continuously, the passenger leaned out of the window and shouted abuse, so
we stopped across the road, forcing them to stop, and I took their picture.

Neither the passenger nor driver appear to be acquainted with the relevant road laws: a cyclist may
use a cycle track, but has every right to remain on the road, and they appear not to know that cycle
tracks have a higher accident rate than riding on the road.

They did appear to consider that they had the right to insist that cyclists should use substandard,
dangerous and inconvenient cycle tracks, and were more than willing to demonstrate their
incomptetence and arrogance by behaving like complete cretins.

If you know either of these morons, a polite word in their ear might save them a lot of hassle later
in life: something along the lines of "you are complete idiots, try and grow up before you drive a
lethal weapon again." should suffice.

Rich
 
T

Tony W

Guest
"ChrisW" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
> An interesting behavioual aspect of this is your dorks' sense of invulnerability.
>
> I assume that there were more than two cyclists on this CTC ride, it's a fair bet that people who
> cycle in their spare time are fitter than those who ride around in jeeps, and I've found in the
> past that an hour or so of vigorous excercise can shorten one's fuse alarmingly. But these two
> dorks seem not to have considered the possibility that this numerically superior group of fit
> people might simply get off their bikes and beat them up, presumably because they were in a car
> and you were on bikes.
>
> Not, of course, that I'm advocating beating up motorists.

But cyclists are nice people. How often have you read of groups of terror cyclists beating innocent
motorists to a pulp?

T
 
I

Ian Walker

Guest
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:25:16 -0000, Tony W <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "ChrisW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> An interesting behavioual aspect of this is your dorks' sense of invulnerability.
>>
>> I assume that there were more than two cyclists on this CTC ride, it's a fair bet that people who
>> cycle in their spare time are fitter than those who ride around in jeeps, and I've found in the
>> past that an hour or so of vigorous excercise can shorten one's fuse alarmingly. But these two
>> dorks seem not to have considered the possibility that this numerically superior group of fit
>> people might simply get off their bikes and beat them up, presumably because they were in a car
>> and you were on bikes.
>>
>> Not, of course, that I'm advocating beating up motorists.
>
> But cyclists are nice people. How often have you read of groups of terror cyclists beating
> innocent motorists to a pulp?
>

*innocent* motorists? Never. Deserving motorists, e.g., those who reverse over cyclists and their
children? Not often enough.

I

--
Ian Walker Remove the yummy paste in my address to reply. Homepage: http://www.drianwalker.com
 
D

David Nutter

Guest
Tony W <[email protected]> said:

> But cyclists are nice people. How often have you read of groups of terror cyclists beating
> innocent motorists to a pulp?

There's a marvellous scene in the film "Fist Power!"[1] where the heroes are attacked by a gang of
ninja cyclists. If that's the Hong Kong equivalent of the CTC I wouldn't mess... :)

Regards,

-david

[1] No, not *that*
 
T

Tony W

Guest
"David Nutter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> There's a marvellous scene in the film "Fist Power!"[1] where the heroes
are
> attacked by a gang of ninja cyclists. If that's the Hong Kong equivalent
of
> the CTC I wouldn't mess... :)

You mean the sort of guys who ride with no lights, in black, at night and get aggressive when you
suggest they shouldn't ride on the pavement?

T
 
D

David Nutter

Guest
Tony W <[email protected]> said:

> You mean the sort of guys who ride with no lights, in black, at night and get aggressive when you
> suggest they shouldn't ride on the pavement?

Not really, no. The flip-out-and-kill-people-other-than-themselves kind of ninjas.

Regards,

-david
 
M

Marc

Guest
David Nutter <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > But cyclists are nice people. How often have you read of groups of terror cyclists beating
> > innocent motorists to a pulp?
>
> There's a marvellous scene in the film "Fist Power!"[1] where the heroes are attacked by a gang of
> ninja cyclists. If that's the Hong Kong equivalent of the CTC I wouldn't mess... :)
>
> Regards,
>
> -david
>
> [1] No, not *that*

Not what?
 
M

Marc

Guest
wafflycathcsdirtycatlitter <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do you wanna be in my gang, my gang, my gang? Do you wanna be in my gang, oh yeeeeaaah! I'm the
> leeeeeder, I'm the leeeeeder, I'm the leeeeder of the gang, I am!

You really want to be in Gary Glitters gang? Don't take your computer to PC world!
 
T

Tony W

Guest
"David Nutter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Not really, no. The flip-out-and-kill-people-other-than-themselves kind of ninjas.

Ahh. Fortunately we don't get too many of them around here -- though there is an excess of the
other sort :(

T
 
T

Tim Hall

Guest
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:56:43 +0000, [email protected] (Marc) wrote:

>David Nutter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> > But cyclists are nice people. How often have you read of groups of terror cyclists beating
>> > innocent motorists to a pulp?
>>
>> There's a marvellous scene in the film "Fist Power!"[1] where the heroes are attacked by a gang
>> of ninja cyclists. If that's the Hong Kong equivalent of the CTC I wouldn't mess... :)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -david
>>
>> [1] No, not *that*
>
>Not what?

What Julian Clary didn't do to Norman Lamont, oh no, certainly not.

Tim
--

fast and gripping, non pompous, glossy and credible.
 
D

Dave Kahn

Guest
[email protected] (Marc) wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...

> You really want to be in Gary Glitters gang? Don't take your computer to PC world!

Or if you do, don't make a special point of asking them not to look through the hard disk. :)

--
Dave...
 
T

Thornbury South

Guest
Hello, Sorry to offend anyone-BUT- the starter of this thread is well known as a instigator of over
the top cycle campaigning and is generally known from opinions cast by persons not to be named on
here as a pain in the a***. My own opinions do not count particularly to persons not known to me at
all who insist on talking about Campervans-the prats. Kind regards, John.

--
John, Pauline & Hannah. Thornbury, South Gloucestershire. UK. http://www.pbase.com/john28july
 
M

Myra Vaninwegen

Guest
"Thornbury South Gloucestershire" <jsbr12499 @NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote
> Sorry to offend anyone-BUT- the starter of this thread is well known as a instigator of over the
> top cycle campaigning

Richard Burton wrote:
> Neither the passenger nor driver appear to be acquainted with the relevant road laws: a cyclist
> may use a cycle track, but has every right to remain on the road, and they appear not to know that
> cycle tracks have a higher accident rate than riding on the road.

If Richard's post is what you mean by "over the top cycle campaigning" I feel very sorry for you. I
also refuse to use cycle provision that I consider inadequate and more dangerous than riding on the
road, and I bet that the vast majority of posters on this group do too. If you use all cycle
provision no matter how shitty, well, that's your choice. But don't go trying to impose your opinion
on those of us who prefer to get where we're going safely and with a minimum of hassle, using roads
rather than cycle proviion if it's more appropriate.

As for your initial response to this thread, the initial post made it clear that the dorks in the
Jeep were objecting to them not using the cycle path, not objecting to the cyclists preventing them
from overtaking.

Personally, on the matter of overtaking groups, this is one of the reasons I don't like to ride in
groups too much. If you have a long queue of two-abreast cyclists, it really is difficult to
overtake, and I don't feel comfortable about holding up a motorist for say five minutes (as often
happens) while they wait to find a place to overtake safely. Many people get really irritated by
this and take a chance by overtaking in not-so-safe a place. I prefer riding on my own or with
just one or two other people. If a motorist stays behind me for a bit, waiting for a chance to
overtake, if a suitable place doesn't come up soon I reward their patience by pulling off and
letting them go by.

-Myra
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads