"Luigi de Guzman" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:29:58 +0100, Jeremy Parker wrote:
[snip]
>> That varies with location. Cambridge has a higher bike modal
>> split
>> than Amsterdam, and there must normally be close to a thousand
>> bikes
>> parked at the train station there. My local station, the
>> outermost
>> London station, on one of the lines to Cambridge, normally has one
>> bike parked, except when my bike makes a second.
>
> Ah, I've been found out. A thousand cycles at Cambridge station
> would be
> a conservative estimate... But I've seen a fair number of cycles
> locked
> up on some of those stations, at least from the train window.
Yes. One of the towns along the line is Stevenage, first of the post
WW II "new towns", famous for its bike path network. If you build
the bike paths first, and then add the houses round them, its easier
to build a good network than if you try to retrofit facilities
afterwards. Back during the bike/ecology boom of the late 1960s and
early '70s Stevenage was famous throughout the world. It's the town
that taught the Dutch how to do bike networks. Eric Claxton,
Stevenage's chief engineer, used to roam the world, giving talks
about the network.
Stevenage doesn't get nearly as many bikes at its station as does
Cambridge, but does normally have well over a hundred, I would say.
It's interesting the Hitchin, the next station towards Cambridge,
which is just an ordinary market town, and has no special bike
facilities at all, as far as I know, seems to have almost as many
bikes parked as Stevenage
Cambridge doesn't really have much in the way of bike facilities.
There is a super expensive bike bridge over the railway, next to the
station, and lots of short cuts across parks, which have always been
there, probably since bikes were invented. There was an outbreak of
bike lanes in, I would guess, about the 1970s or 1980s, but the bikes
were there before the bike lanes.
Jeremy Parker