T
Terry Collins
Guest
Zebee Johnstone wrote:
> Anyone have any experience with dynamos? I know I can go hub or
> bottle, I expect I'll go bottle. Any recommendations?
My preference was for hub over under bracket, over bottle.
Hub (Sturney Archer) was less effort than bottle or under bracket
(between).
Hub is less susceptable to dirt, water (usually) and damage than bottle
or under bracket.
I've had three bottles break down over the first ten years and the Sanyo
under bracket (started to wear), whereas the Sturney Archer hub suffered
loss of magnetisom because I removed the magnet without a keeper(coil of
metal). Woops. I'd hove to see a hub generator with ceramic magnets
these days {
The caveats with hub, bracket, bottle generators are
1) they seem to need 15-20 km/hr to give usuable light,
2) you need to use myriad zener diodes to prevent bulb popping if
zooming downhill,
3) they stop when you stop (some capacitor/battery combo might help
here) and
4) some part has to be left on the bike (usually minimum of generator)
all the time (theft, weather, weight, etc).
OTOH, now it would be interesting to see a system driving good leds
compared to the old incandescent bulb jobs.
In comparison, the issue with batteries systems is cost and weight. The
cheapest is SLA/gel battery which is weighty, but the lightest is led +
Li-On(still most energy dense?), but expensive.
My experience is that all the rechargeable batteries have a life of 2-3
years over which time they degrade capacity and you eventually chuck
them and replace them. So they are great if you are a regular user.
The major problem with rechargeable systems is cheap rechargers. Peeps
leave the batteries plugged in and the recharger recharges them and
slowly starts to overcharge/stew/destroy them.
> Anyone have any experience with dynamos? I know I can go hub or
> bottle, I expect I'll go bottle. Any recommendations?
My preference was for hub over under bracket, over bottle.
Hub (Sturney Archer) was less effort than bottle or under bracket
(between).
Hub is less susceptable to dirt, water (usually) and damage than bottle
or under bracket.
I've had three bottles break down over the first ten years and the Sanyo
under bracket (started to wear), whereas the Sturney Archer hub suffered
loss of magnetisom because I removed the magnet without a keeper(coil of
metal). Woops. I'd hove to see a hub generator with ceramic magnets
these days {
The caveats with hub, bracket, bottle generators are
1) they seem to need 15-20 km/hr to give usuable light,
2) you need to use myriad zener diodes to prevent bulb popping if
zooming downhill,
3) they stop when you stop (some capacitor/battery combo might help
here) and
4) some part has to be left on the bike (usually minimum of generator)
all the time (theft, weather, weight, etc).
OTOH, now it would be interesting to see a system driving good leds
compared to the old incandescent bulb jobs.
In comparison, the issue with batteries systems is cost and weight. The
cheapest is SLA/gel battery which is weighty, but the lightest is led +
Li-On(still most energy dense?), but expensive.
My experience is that all the rechargeable batteries have a life of 2-3
years over which time they degrade capacity and you eventually chuck
them and replace them. So they are great if you are a regular user.
The major problem with rechargeable systems is cheap rechargers. Peeps
leave the batteries plugged in and the recharger recharges them and
slowly starts to overcharge/stew/destroy them.