~patches~ said:Jen said:"~patches~" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Wait a minute. That is libel. I *did not* upload any pics from her
site. I merely mentioned what was going on to a couple of friends who
took it further through their friends and I must say having seen the
websites the effects are rather grand. If I was the butt of a joke
she is more than the butt of a joke and I did nothing. Yep as
nothing through my server, nothing anyone could ever trace, nothing.
Heck, I wasn't even home when the first set of pics went out. It's
too bad but again revenge is a [censored]. Without me telling her the
urls she will have a hard time finding the pics too. Again, not my
problem.
Patches, I know many people have been nasty and egged you on - and
still are. But maybe it's time to give it a rest. It's really
starting to get out of hand, and you're becoming the one being nasty
and egging people on.
Jen
Yes Jen, I can see how you see it that way. Some things have continued
off line not aired to the ng 🙁
If they are, I have not heard anything about it. The things you have
threatened to do, and claimed other people have done for you, with the
digital images of my child, are illegal, and If you're actually telling
the truth about all of this, *you're* going to be the one facing legal
action.
I really would just like it to rest and
Quoted message said:be over and done. One poster did something they should have. I
mentioned that to a couple of friends. That kind of esculated and I did
see the results but I did nothing myself. We did bash this thing around
on my yahoo group. One post from me and somehow it blew out of
perportion (sp). Back to lurkdom it looks like.
--
saerah
http://anisaerah.cmayes.net/blog/
email:
anisaerah at s b c global.net
Adam Bowman said:I always wonder when someone brings up a point about Bush, and you
then bring up something that Clinton did, are you saying they are both
wrong? Because that's all it points out to me, places where they both
messed up. It doesn't negate the fact that Bush did wrong; was that
your intention?
That type of argument is like
"Bob shot someone"
"Yeah, but don't you remember when Don hit that guy with a bat?"