ebikes: lots of bad ideas

[johns]

Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
get ..

1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque
to break the front forks. So that company only
recommends rear-wheel hub motors.
2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power
rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than
a 4% grade.
3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can
generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade.
4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35
to 40 pounds. WHAT ???????????
5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a
battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill
for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of
your charge.
6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a
very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up
between the pedals, and drive the chain.
7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph.
In real life, they get about half their rated milage per
charge.
8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60
pounds.
9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your
bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration
of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to
rotate in the proper direction. These operations can
void your kit warranty.
10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years,
so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it.

Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go.

johns

 

[[email protected]]

On May 28, 5:58 pm, johns <[email protected]> wrote:
> Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
> on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
> get ..
>
> 1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque
>     to break the front forks. So that company only
>     recommends rear-wheel hub motors.
> 2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power
>     rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than
>     a 4% grade.
> 3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can
>     generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade.
> 4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35
>     to 40 pounds. WHAT ???????????
> 5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a
>     battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill
>     for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of
>     your charge.
> 6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a
>     very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up
>     between the pedals, and drive the chain.
> 7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph.
>     In real life, they get about half their rated milage per
>     charge.
> 8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60
>     pounds.
> 9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your
>     bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration
>     of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to
>     rotate in the proper direction. These operations can
>     void your kit warranty.
> 10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years,
>      so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it.
>
> Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go.
>
> johns

No wonder I've never seen one.

Joseph

 

[DougC]

johns wrote:
> Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
> on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
> get ..
>
> ........
>
> Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go.
>
> johns

One thing I noticed right off when I started looking into gas and
electric bicycle engine kits, was that the people with electrics always,
always ended up wishing they could ride longer. During a short test ride
the torque/acceleration can seem impressive, and you usually cannot
explore the limitations of the battery endurance.

With gas engines you can ride all day if you keep pouring gas in. Most
of the gas ones don't do real well up hills either, because they only
allow one drive speed. The Staton/NuVinci setup seems to be the first
that allows variable drive ratios.

A few people have built bikes using the cheap Lifan moped/motorcycle
engines, 50-to-100cc engines that only cost around $300 and come with a
3- or 4-speed transmission. These are usually over legal
displacement/power/top speed limits but the multiple gears totally
eliminates the problem of hillclimbing. And the engine/trans weighs
around 40 lbs.
~

 

[johns]

I rode motorcycles for 20+ years as my only
transportation ... and lived through it
I could ride for days and just camp on the road,
and I never got tired of it. Only reason I stopped
was BMW started producing **** bikes, and
I sure wasn't going back to all that repair and
downtime with any other brand. BMW put garbage
brakes on all their new bikes, and I have a rule
about unsafe motorcycles. Only in the last year
have I even thought about it. There's a small
lightweight touring bike in Europe that looks just
like my old Penton 125cc Enduro. I had the 6-day
bike, and I rode it for a hundred miles in the dirt
in races. It would make a good modern road
bike. Mine got about 65 mpg, and it could have
been tuned down to get more. Only weighed
200 pounds. So, what I'm saying ... if I go
back to a motorcycle, it will be a real bike
with good handling. I'm seeing ebikes that I
think cross the line to emotorcycles ... and
are not safe at all.

johns

 

[John Tserkezis]

johns wrote:

> Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
> on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
> get ..

Similar thing to what I keep telling people when they ponder the idea of hub
motors for assistance.

If you take the typical weight of a hub motor, batteries, and control
assembly, and lose that weight from around your now massive ****, you would
more than make up for it, and it cost a whole lot less than the asking price.

And I want to dispute the saving of $20K over three years. Against what? A
car? You can't compare apples and oranges you know.

Want to compare against another bike? Sure, take that $14K price tag,
donate it, buy Enron shares, burn it, whatever, and you'll save more than that
60 pounds in bike weight in body weight loss, and improvment in health over
the next few years, AND save that in healthcare costs.

Hub motors have their place, but not for those who have functional legs,
heck, even ONE functional leg is enough (seen a fellow commuter amputee who
did it without a damn motor).
--
Linux Registered User # 302622
<http://counter.li.org>

 

[clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada]

On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:58:31 -0700 (PDT), johns <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
>on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
>get ..
>
>1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque
> to break the front forks. So that company only
> recommends rear-wheel hub motors.
>2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power
> rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than
> a 4% grade.
>3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can
> generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade.
>4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35
> to 40 pounds. WHAT ???????????
>5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a
> battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill
> for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of
> your charge.
>6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a
> very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up
> between the pedals, and drive the chain.
>7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph.
> In real life, they get about half their rated milage per
> charge.
>8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60
> pounds.
>9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your
> bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration
> of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to
> rotate in the proper direction. These operations can
> void your kit warranty.
>10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years,
> so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it.
>
>Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go.
>
>johns


Well, I'll respond to a few of these points.

1- If the hub motor can produce enough torque to break the fork,,
either the fork is so weal it is already unsafe, and/or Number 2 has
to be wrong.

2_ If this is the case, the fork must be extremely weak and unsafe,
even without the motor.

3- Even a low powered gear motor may not be able to pull an 8% grade.
And just because it is a hub motor does NOT mean it is not a gear
motor. There are planetary geared hub motors out there.

4- Look at a Currie 450 watt gear motor. Can't weigh much more than 5
lbs. Then again, a mobility scooter motor can weigh anywhere from 5
to 40 lbs (for an aproxemately 350 watt motor) I have motors at both
ends of the scale.

5- I'd agree. Regenerative braking is oversold. It is ONLY viable with
a direct drive hub motor. Any other setup gives away too much
efficiency by having to back-drive it whenever running without power
on.

6- Yes, hub motors are unsprung weight. So are geared motors mounted
at the wheel like the Currie.
And so are ANY motor mouinted to a non-suspension bicycle.
Yes, mounting them close to the bottom bracket and driving through the
chain (allowing use of the gears) IS the most efficient - and requires
a free-wheel crankset.

7- Rated mileage on mine says "with normal pedaling" These are
ELECTRIC ASSIST BICYCLES, not electric motorcycles. I have no doubt I
can get the rated mileage if I use the motor only as an ASSIST. I was
going to find out today by attempting a 35 KM jaunt (mile is rated,
IIRC, at 20 miles maximum range) but I ended up having to cancel
because I needed to take the truck and cxover a LOT more distance in
less time.

8- Yup.

9- Machining on the bike voids the kit warranty? You need to adjust
something on the motor to make it work, which voids the warranty?
Sounds like a rather halfassed kit with no support - likely an "import
it yourself" chinese box of junk.

10- You paid HOW MUCH for it???? The marketing hype has pushed a LOT
of E-Bike prices into the stratosphere. I just bought a pretty decent
fully equipped e-bike for just over $600, all taxes in.
It has fenders at both ends, a rear carrier, stand, lights, mirror,
bell, reflectors - everything I need. It IS heavy and has a "limited"
range - as advertized - but 8 tanks of gas for my van will pay for the
bike at TODAY'S prices.
That should be doable just going back and forth to the office for one
summer.
I'm adding a 26ah battery pack on the rack to supplement the 12ah pack
for longer trips - and possibly going to 36 volts instead of 24 for a
bit more power. I'll still have under a thousand dollars tied up in
it, even buying the heavier charger required for the "premium"
batteries.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada]

On Wed, 28 May 2008 10:21:32 -0700 (PDT),
"joseph.santani[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On May 28, 5:58 pm, johns <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
>> on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
>> get ..
>>
>> 1. Front wheel hub motors can generate enough torque
>>     to break the front forks. So that company only
>>     recommends rear-wheel hub motors.
>> 2. Most hub motors .. no matter what their "power
>>     rating" don't have enough torque to pull more than
>>     a 4% grade.
>> 3. Only gear motors ... even low power ones .. can
>>     generate enough torque to pull an 8% grade.
>> 4. ( another group ) .. Gear motors weigh about 35
>>     to 40 pounds. WHAT ???????????
>> 5. Regenerative braking is a joke. To recharge a
>>     battery using RB, you would have to coast downhill
>>     for 20 hours. Ordinarily, RB can return about 3% of
>>     your charge.
>> 6. Hub motors are unsprung weight. They cause a
>>     very uncomfortable ride. The emotor should go up
>>     between the pedals, and drive the chain.
>> 7. Battery ratings are for flat terrain at about 10 mph.
>>     In real life, they get about half their rated milage per
>>     charge.
>> 8. The average finished ebike will weigh more than 60
>>     pounds.
>> 9. Some of the ebike "kits" require machining of your
>>     bikes parts in order to fit. They also require calibration
>>     of the hub motor sensors in order to get the motor to
>>     rotate in the proper direction. These operations can
>>     void your kit warranty.
>> 10. An ebike can save you $20,000.00 over 3 years,
>>      so it is worth the $14,000.00 they are asking for it.
>>
>> Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go.
>>
>> johns
>
>No wonder I've never seen one.
>
>Joseph


I've got one factory built unit and am building a "homebrew". It will
have 7 speeds and front wheel drive, with 18 or 21 speeds on the rear
"pedal power unit" The geared motor I am using IS a bit heavy - and
the front fork is VERY beefy. NO suspension.

The ebike is here.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada]

On Wed, 28 May 2008 15:35:47 -0700 (PDT), johns <[email protected]>
wrote:

>I rode motorcycles for 20+ years as my only
>transportation ... and lived through it
>I could ride for days and just camp on the road,
>and I never got tired of it. Only reason I stopped
>was BMW started producing **** bikes, and
>I sure wasn't going back to all that repair and
>downtime with any other brand. BMW put garbage
>brakes on all their new bikes, and I have a rule
>about unsafe motorcycles. Only in the last year
>have I even thought about it. There's a small
>lightweight touring bike in Europe that looks just
>like my old Penton 125cc Enduro. I had the 6-day
>bike, and I rode it for a hundred miles in the dirt
>in races. It would make a good modern road
>bike. Mine got about 65 mpg, and it could have
>been tuned down to get more. Only weighed
>200 pounds. So, what I'm saying ... if I go
>back to a motorcycle, it will be a real bike
>with good handling. I'm seeing ebikes that I
>think cross the line to emotorcycles ... and
>are not safe at all.
>
>johns
A lot of the socalled "e-bikes" I am seeing in Ontario are poorly
disguised electric motor scooters - which you would NEVER pedal in
normal use, and definitely no more than a block.

I sure like my Schwinn/Currie I-Zip from Canadian Tire.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada]

On Thu, 29 May 2008 09:54:38 +1000, John Tserkezis
<[email protected]> wrote:

>johns wrote:
>
>> Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
>> on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
>> get ..
>
> Similar thing to what I keep telling people when they ponder the idea of hub
>motors for assistance.
>
> If you take the typical weight of a hub motor, batteries, and control
>assembly, and lose that weight from around your now massive ****, you would
>more than make up for it, and it cost a whole lot less than the asking price.
>
> And I want to dispute the saving of $20K over three years. Against what? A
>car? You can't compare apples and oranges you know.
>
> Want to compare against another bike? Sure, take that $14K price tag,
>donate it, buy Enron shares, burn it, whatever, and you'll save more than that
>60 pounds in bike weight in body weight loss, and improvment in health over
>the next few years, AND save that in healthcare costs.
>
> Hub motors have their place, but not for those who have functional legs,
>heck, even ONE functional leg is enough (seen a fellow commuter amputee who
>did it without a damn motor).


Some of us "old guys" don't have the legs or the lungs to do the
distance we need to go without assistance - and particularly not
without getting all sweated up on the way to the office. With my
e-bike, I pedal, but not strenuously, for about 18 minutes to get to
the office instead of driving the van for 8 minutes. I get the
exercise I would not get driving, and arrive at work in better shape
than I ever would with my normal bicycle - which has not beed ridden
much over the last several yearsdue to a bad knee, among other things.
To do the trip with my old 21 speed bike would take me half an hour
and I'd arrive sweaty and worn out. There are several pretty good
hills on the route (the main highway is much leveler, but no bikes,
mopeds, e-bikes, pedestrians, etc allowed)

As a kid of about 15, I lost a pedal on a SINGLE SPEED bike 30 miles
from home, and rode it back, up hill and down. I'm not that young any
more!!!!
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[[email protected]]

On May 28, 1:03 pm, DougC <[email protected]> wrote:
> johns wrote:
> > Before I start building my ebike, I'm reading everything I can find
> > on what is available. So far, I'm learning more about what not to
> > get ..
>
> > Sounds to me like the ebike has a ways to go.
>
> One thing I noticed right off when I started looking into gas and
> electric bicycle engine kits, was that the people with electrics always,
> always ended up wishing they could ride longer. During a short test ride
> the torque/acceleration can seem impressive, and you usually cannot
> explore the limitations of the battery endurance.
>
> With gas engines you can ride all day if you keep pouring gas in. Most
> of the gas ones don't do real well up hills either, because they only
> allow one drive speed. The Staton/NuVinci setup seems to be the first
> that allows variable drive ratios.
>
> A few people have built bikes using the cheap Lifan moped/motorcycle
> engines, 50-to-100cc engines that only cost around $300 and come with a
> 3- or 4-speed transmission. These are usually over legal
> displacement/power/top speed limits but the multiple gears totally
> eliminates the problem of hillclimbing. And the engine/trans weighs
> around 40 lbs.

It seems like at that point, you're getting into
"just buy a moped" territory.

I used to live in a hilly area and knew
some people who got E-bikes or Curries to
commute up the hill to work (elevation gain
800 ft, a real hill). They work for that -
only need a fairly short ride time, twice a day,
power gets you up the hill, but not at car speed.
I preferred riding a much lighter plain old
people-bike, but not everyone wants to get
that much exercise.

However, people who want the ebike to cruise
at high speeds or have a really long range
are basically asking it to be an imitation
moped, scooter, or motorcycle. I doubt
that one can make a decent faux moped without
making it as heavy as a moped, and then it
would probably be better and safer to actually
get a moped. The same goes triple for
motorcycles. Electric scooters could be an
interesting, and quieter, niche.

My pet peeve: people who ride loud gas-powered
"bicycles" on bike paths. Get on the road.

Ben

 

[Ted Mittelstaedt]

"johns" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:19cd[email protected]...
> I rode motorcycles for 20+ years as my only
> transportation ... and lived through it
> I could ride for days and just camp on the road,
> and I never got tired of it. Only reason I stopped
> was BMW started producing **** bikes,

Huh?

I commute 30 miles round trip every day on a 1980
Honda 750 K, up and down a 5% grade hill that's
about 4 miles long. That's a 28 year old bike, sir.

I also have a 1982 750C in the garage as a spare
bike with 78K miles on it.

Still plenty of people running airheads. airheads.org
is what you want.

I missed the law that said you had to buy a new sickle
every year.

Ted

 

[John Tserkezis]

clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada wrote:

> Some of us "old guys" don't have the legs or the lungs to do the
> distance we need to go without assistance - and particularly not
> without getting all sweated up on the way to the office.

So what? It's a given that I sweat, and if I don't, that means I've been
sitting on my **** in front of the television. Heck, I routinely sweat
walking. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH SWEATING.
Sheeze, we're not women. And that statement doesn't ever work. All the
women I know who cycle are more capable and prepared than many guys I know,
and are quite happy to do respectable distances without crying over it either.

> As a kid of about 15, I lost a pedal on a SINGLE SPEED bike 30 miles
> from home, and rode it back, up hill and down. I'm not that young any
> more!!!!

Again, so what? I'm a kid of 38, and I've learned since I was 15 that you
prepare. I can afford pedals that DON'T fall off in the first place. I also
carry tyre patches and tools to fix things on the road should that ever eventuate.
Never had a case that stopped me altogether since I started preparing for
things like that. In the very unlikely event a catastrophic failure occurs
that does stop me, being 38 means now that I can afford a GPS receiver that
can tell me where the nearest railway station is. Or without a GPS receiver,
I can use my cellphone that buys me the lend of a cab to get home.

We all took stupid unprepared risks when we were 15 - but since we're not 15
anymore "we" don't have an excuse for not riding in the first place because
you don't like the worst case scenario of a cab ride home.
--
Linux Registered User # 302622
<http://counter.li.org>

 

[clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada]

On Fri, 30 May 2008 20:07:11 +1000, John Tserkezis
<[email protected]> wrote:

>clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada wrote:
>
>> Some of us "old guys" don't have the legs or the lungs to do the
>> distance we need to go without assistance - and particularly not
>> without getting all sweated up on the way to the office.
>
> So what? It's a given that I sweat, and if I don't, that means I've been
>sitting on my **** in front of the television. Heck, I routinely sweat
>walking. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH SWEATING.
> Sheeze, we're not women. And that statement doesn't ever work. All the
>women I know who cycle are more capable and prepared than many guys I know,
>and are quite happy to do respectable distances without crying over it either.
>
>> As a kid of about 15, I lost a pedal on a SINGLE SPEED bike 30 miles
>> from home, and rode it back, up hill and down. I'm not that young any
>> more!!!!
>
> Again, so what? I'm a kid of 38, and I've learned since I was 15 that you
>prepare. I can afford pedals that DON'T fall off in the first place. I also
>carry tyre patches and tools to fix things on the road should that ever eventuate.
> Never had a case that stopped me altogether since I started preparing for
>things like that. In the very unlikely event a catastrophic failure occurs
>that does stop me, being 38 means now that I can afford a GPS receiver that
>can tell me where the nearest railway station is. Or without a GPS receiver,
>I can use my cellphone that buys me the lend of a cab to get home.
>
> We all took stupid unprepared risks when we were 15 - but since we're not 15
>anymore "we" don't have an excuse for not riding in the first place because
>you don't like the worst case scenario of a cab ride home.


Wait till your a kid if 58. With bad knees. ANd even good, new,
expensive parts break sometimes.
And goody for you for being a rich yuppy who can afford the best of
everything.
There are many of us in the "real world" riding sub/thousand dollar
bikes, and in areas without mass transit, where cell phone reception
is spotty at best and the nearest cab is 25 miles away.

Sheesh!
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[John Tserkezis]

clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada wrote:

> Wait till your a kid if 58. With bad knees. ANd even good, new,
> expensive parts break sometimes.
> And goody for you for being a rich yuppy who can afford the best of
> everything.
> There are many of us in the "real world" riding sub/thousand dollar
> bikes, and in areas without mass transit, where cell phone reception
> is spotty at best and the nearest cab is 25 miles away.

Health issues aside, a million dollar bike only buys low weight. You can
still make a cheapy bike reliable. In fact, I've ridden on cheapy bikes for a
large chunk of my life so far, and the reliability issues (or chances of)
haven't changed once I started with the upper market bikes, and maintaining
and preparing both.

Yes, certain designs can be more lenient on normally catastrophic failures,
such as disk brakes. I've lost at least half a dozen spokes (chain slipped
past the large chainring at the rear), just wrapped them around the others to
stop them from clanging, and continued on till I fixed it later.
I keep a spoke tightening tool just in case I have to improvise even more.

At one time, I've (sort of) repaired a taco'ed wheel for a friend, and he
still managed to limp home. It was buckled very badly, and throw-away
afterwards because the metal was badly fatigued, but it certainly beat walking
home.

So if you're going to do some distance where walking is your ONLY other
option, cellphone coverage is iffy (such as mountain biking), you carry spares
and tools to take care of your tyres (and yes, I've had normally catastrophic
failures on tyres that have split open) you can at the very least limp home,
if not ride normally.

These are bicycles, they're not highly technical precision pieces of
equipment. You can insure, prevent, or at least improvise on just about
everything except a cracked frame.

And that's not likely to happen.
But it's no reason not to leave home just in case either.


This is my point. You can maintain your bike, and carry a very reasonable
amount of spares and tools to take care of almost everything, so it'll get you
to where you're going one way or another without walking or other options.

Yes, years of failures have taught me on what to carry (some of my "spares"
are somewhat questionable), but being 38, or 58, gives you that experience.
Good knees or bad (and mine aren't exactly first class either), providing your
health will let you do it, then don't use excuses of failure to not to.
--
Linux Registered User # 302622
<http://counter.li.org>

 

[clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada]

On Fri, 30 May 2008 23:26:27 +1000, John Tserkezis
<[email protected]> wrote:

>clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada wrote:
>
>> Wait till your a kid if 58. With bad knees. ANd even good, new,
>> expensive parts break sometimes.
>> And goody for you for being a rich yuppy who can afford the best of
>> everything.
>> There are many of us in the "real world" riding sub/thousand dollar
>> bikes, and in areas without mass transit, where cell phone reception
>> is spotty at best and the nearest cab is 25 miles away.
>
> Health issues aside, a million dollar bike only buys low weight. You can
>still make a cheapy bike reliable. In fact, I've ridden on cheapy bikes for a
>large chunk of my life so far, and the reliability issues (or chances of)
>haven't changed once I started with the upper market bikes, and maintaining
>and preparing both.
>
> Yes, certain designs can be more lenient on normally catastrophic failures,
>such as disk brakes. I've lost at least half a dozen spokes (chain slipped
>past the large chainring at the rear), just wrapped them around the others to
>stop them from clanging, and continued on till I fixed it later.
> I keep a spoke tightening tool just in case I have to improvise even more.
>
> At one time, I've (sort of) repaired a taco'ed wheel for a friend, and he
>still managed to limp home. It was buckled very badly, and throw-away
>afterwards because the metal was badly fatigued, but it certainly beat walking
>home.
>
> So if you're going to do some distance where walking is your ONLY other
>option, cellphone coverage is iffy (such as mountain biking), you carry spares
>and tools to take care of your tyres (and yes, I've had normally catastrophic
>failures on tyres that have split open) you can at the very least limp home,
>if not ride normally.
>
> These are bicycles, they're not highly technical precision pieces of
>equipment. You can insure, prevent, or at least improvise on just about
>everything except a cracked frame.
>
> And that's not likely to happen.
> But it's no reason not to leave home just in case either.
>
>
> This is my point. You can maintain your bike, and carry a very reasonable
>amount of spares and tools to take care of almost everything, so it'll get you
>to where you're going one way or another without walking or other options.
>
> Yes, years of failures have taught me on what to carry (some of my "spares"
>are somewhat questionable), but being 38, or 58, gives you that experience.
>Good knees or bad (and mine aren't exactly first class either), providing your
>health will let you do it, then don't use excuses of failure to not to.


The original question was re: e-bikes and their use.
I just stated that I can ride my E-Bike and get exercise that I would
not otherwise get because my legs and lungs not being what they once
were, the electric assist gets me up hills a little easier, with less
stress on the old legs. Riding to work in now feasible where it was
NOT with my standard bike.
It is NOT an electric moped, or an electric motorbike.(and should not
be condemned for low range or limitted hillclimbing capability because
it is what it is, and isn't what it isn't).
There are areas within town, where cellphone coverage is spotty. Don't
need to be mountain biking. Areas only a few miles from home, on open
roads, where you could not call for help on a cell phone.
Also many small towns with no taxi, where getting a cab would cost
more than a reasonable bicycle.

In all my years of riding (cheap) bikes I've only had that ONE
breakdown that limitted my ability to get home. Back then one pedal
was just a challenge. Today it would be a bit more (and it was the
pedal CRANK that broke, not the pedal itself)
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[DougC]

John Tserkezis wrote:
> clare at snyder dot ontario dot canada wrote:
>
> So what? It's a given that I sweat, and if I don't, that means I've
> been sitting on my **** in front of the television. Heck, I routinely
> sweat walking. THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH SWEATING.
> Sheeze, we're not women. And that statement doesn't ever work. All
> the women I know who cycle are more capable and prepared than many guys
> I know, and are quite happy to do respectable distances without crying
> over it either.
>

The problem here is a lack of perspective--that the idea of riding a
motorized bicycle may be less of the purpose of getting exercise, and
more of the purpose of getting somewhere cheaper or easier (or even
-/funner/-) than by using other larger forms of transportation.

Where I live, the terrain is mostly flat and the power limitations of
registered mopeds and motorized bicycles are the same, but the bicycles
have no registration or licensing requirements. ....The reliability of
bicycle engines is probably still not quite up to what a cheap moped can
manage, but then, most bicycle engine setups allow you to pedal the
bicycle normally should you ever need to. If the engine on a moped
fails, you're walking home--just like with a motorcycle.
~