M
Mike Vandeman
Guest
November 24, 1999 Tony Acosta Director, Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs 1520
Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612
Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park
Dear Sir:
I am very concerned about the arbitrary and discriminatory management of Oakland's parks. I
like to practice bulldozer racing (also known as "bulldozer scrambling", or BS, for short).
That is my way of enjoying nature. Who are you to tell me how I should enjoy nature?! Why
__________________________________________________
is your way of enjoying the outdoors any better than mine?! ____ ____ You allow roller-bladers,
equestrians, mountain bikers, and even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded, and can't enjoy
________
the parks that I pay taxes for. You obviously like them better than me, or maybe you belong to one
of those user groups, so you are biased towards them. In any case, you are discriminating against me
and other bulldozer racers, and I demand that this discrimination, which violates the Fifth
Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately!
I know that bulldozer racers have a bad name, but that's just because we are the new kid on
the block. We are a tiny minority. I know that there have been some problems, such as some
people riding recklessly, going off the designated trails, and even secretly constructing
illegal trails. But those are a small minority of bulldozer riders. You shouldn't allow a
small minority to give the majority of us bulldozer racers, who ride responsibly, a bad
name. Why should we be punished, just because of them, and be forced to walk, just ________
____ like everybody else?
I also know that some extremist tree-huggers claim that it's a violation of CEQA (the
California Environmental Quality Act) to allow a new use of the park trails, and the
creation of new trails, without doing an EIR (Environmental Impact Report). But you are
right: mountain biking and bulldozer racing, when performed in an environmentally
responsible
________________________________________________
manner, doesn't have a significant impact on the environment.
______
In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You can tell
__________
that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the
mountain biking trails. If the trails didn't benefit them,
they wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing
doesn't drive out wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of
____
wildlife where I ride.
Some people say that we ride too fast to avoid killing small animals on the trail, such as
snakes -- that we have to pay attention to avoid crashing, and can't also look out for
wildlife. Are they that slow? What about "survival of the fittest"? If they are that slow,
they aren't going to survive, anyway.
Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain bikers call them) claim that bulldozer
racing does more harm to the environment than hiking. But a scientific study was done in
________________
New Zealand, proving that bulldozer racing does no more harm
_______
than hiking. Another scientific study showed that most erosion
________________
is caused by nature, and so any additional erosion caused by bulldozer racing is not significant, by
comparison. Would you rather have the park clear-cut, or turned into another gated community for the
rich? Without the support of strong environmentalists like us, that's what will inevitably happen!
We are your strongest defense against development. If a park doesn't have a strong constituency of
recreational users, no
____________
one will care about it, and it will inevitably be lost.
____
(That's what those environmental extremists call "destroying it, in order to save it". But what do
they know?) The HOHAs
____
claim that vehicles make it too easy for lazy, uncaring people to get into wildlife habitat. But if
nobody goes there, who will protect the park? The more people go to a park, the
_________________________________
better it is for the wildlife!
______________________________
Another claim is that we compact the soil around redwoods, killing them! Can you believe
that?! In Muir Woods National Monument, they don't even let people walk next to them, making
____
them stick to pavement or raised walkways. They must be run by an environmental extremist
tree-hugger!
I know that some HOHAs claim that bulldozer racing is annoying, and destroys their
experience of nature. I guess they're superior to everybody else. They are just being
selfish. They just don't want to share "their" trails with anybody else! That's obvious. The
older ones claim that they have given up going there, because they are afraid of being hit,
or are tired of constantly having to get off the trail to let bulldozers go by. Isn't that
just evolution -- survival of the fittest? Why should hikers, or anyone else, have the whole
park to themselves? We pay taxes, too. We have just as much right to be there as they do. We
are just as much environmentalists as they are. We love nature! That's why we
____
want to ride there!
When you have spent as much on your equipment as we have, believe me, it is very
frustrating, not to have any place to use it! We don't, of course, condone illegal trail
building. However, we can understand the frustration of people whose only sin is
preferring a different way of enjoying nature. They think that, because they are able to
purchase a piece of equipment that lets them go off-road, the public is obligated to give
them a place to use it. That's understandable -- isn't that the American way? Aren't they
just like the pioneers?
We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers") belong in the parks just as much as everybody else. If the
HOHAs don't want us on their trails, because we allegedly create narrow ruts, and make them
difficult to walk on, then we deserve to have our own trails,
___
which we will gladly build for free. There is plenty of space for everyone. If the wildlife don't
like it, they can always move! It's just survival of the fittest. As I said, that's
____
what evolution is all about.
We will even police our own riders, so that you won't have any additional expenses. After
all, how would you catch a renegade
_____
bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive bulldozers, increasing the wear and tear
on the trails. We can do that for you. How about it? There are more and more of us every day.
And we vote.
____
Sincerely,
Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to
help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612
Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park
Dear Sir:
I am very concerned about the arbitrary and discriminatory management of Oakland's parks. I
like to practice bulldozer racing (also known as "bulldozer scrambling", or BS, for short).
That is my way of enjoying nature. Who are you to tell me how I should enjoy nature?! Why
__________________________________________________
is your way of enjoying the outdoors any better than mine?! ____ ____ You allow roller-bladers,
equestrians, mountain bikers, and even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded, and can't enjoy
________
the parks that I pay taxes for. You obviously like them better than me, or maybe you belong to one
of those user groups, so you are biased towards them. In any case, you are discriminating against me
and other bulldozer racers, and I demand that this discrimination, which violates the Fifth
Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately!
I know that bulldozer racers have a bad name, but that's just because we are the new kid on
the block. We are a tiny minority. I know that there have been some problems, such as some
people riding recklessly, going off the designated trails, and even secretly constructing
illegal trails. But those are a small minority of bulldozer riders. You shouldn't allow a
small minority to give the majority of us bulldozer racers, who ride responsibly, a bad
name. Why should we be punished, just because of them, and be forced to walk, just ________
____ like everybody else?
I also know that some extremist tree-huggers claim that it's a violation of CEQA (the
California Environmental Quality Act) to allow a new use of the park trails, and the
creation of new trails, without doing an EIR (Environmental Impact Report). But you are
right: mountain biking and bulldozer racing, when performed in an environmentally
responsible
________________________________________________
manner, doesn't have a significant impact on the environment.
______
In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You can tell
__________
that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the
mountain biking trails. If the trails didn't benefit them,
they wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing
doesn't drive out wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of
____
wildlife where I ride.
Some people say that we ride too fast to avoid killing small animals on the trail, such as
snakes -- that we have to pay attention to avoid crashing, and can't also look out for
wildlife. Are they that slow? What about "survival of the fittest"? If they are that slow,
they aren't going to survive, anyway.
Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain bikers call them) claim that bulldozer
racing does more harm to the environment than hiking. But a scientific study was done in
________________
New Zealand, proving that bulldozer racing does no more harm
_______
than hiking. Another scientific study showed that most erosion
________________
is caused by nature, and so any additional erosion caused by bulldozer racing is not significant, by
comparison. Would you rather have the park clear-cut, or turned into another gated community for the
rich? Without the support of strong environmentalists like us, that's what will inevitably happen!
We are your strongest defense against development. If a park doesn't have a strong constituency of
recreational users, no
____________
one will care about it, and it will inevitably be lost.
____
(That's what those environmental extremists call "destroying it, in order to save it". But what do
they know?) The HOHAs
____
claim that vehicles make it too easy for lazy, uncaring people to get into wildlife habitat. But if
nobody goes there, who will protect the park? The more people go to a park, the
_________________________________
better it is for the wildlife!
______________________________
Another claim is that we compact the soil around redwoods, killing them! Can you believe
that?! In Muir Woods National Monument, they don't even let people walk next to them, making
____
them stick to pavement or raised walkways. They must be run by an environmental extremist
tree-hugger!
I know that some HOHAs claim that bulldozer racing is annoying, and destroys their
experience of nature. I guess they're superior to everybody else. They are just being
selfish. They just don't want to share "their" trails with anybody else! That's obvious. The
older ones claim that they have given up going there, because they are afraid of being hit,
or are tired of constantly having to get off the trail to let bulldozers go by. Isn't that
just evolution -- survival of the fittest? Why should hikers, or anyone else, have the whole
park to themselves? We pay taxes, too. We have just as much right to be there as they do. We
are just as much environmentalists as they are. We love nature! That's why we
____
want to ride there!
When you have spent as much on your equipment as we have, believe me, it is very
frustrating, not to have any place to use it! We don't, of course, condone illegal trail
building. However, we can understand the frustration of people whose only sin is
preferring a different way of enjoying nature. They think that, because they are able to
purchase a piece of equipment that lets them go off-road, the public is obligated to give
them a place to use it. That's understandable -- isn't that the American way? Aren't they
just like the pioneers?
We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers") belong in the parks just as much as everybody else. If the
HOHAs don't want us on their trails, because we allegedly create narrow ruts, and make them
difficult to walk on, then we deserve to have our own trails,
___
which we will gladly build for free. There is plenty of space for everyone. If the wildlife don't
like it, they can always move! It's just survival of the fittest. As I said, that's
____
what evolution is all about.
We will even police our own riders, so that you won't have any additional expenses. After
all, how would you catch a renegade
_____
bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive bulldozers, increasing the wear and tear
on the trails. We can do that for you. How about it? There are more and more of us every day.
And we vote.
____
Sincerely,
Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to
help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande