swampy1970 said:Hahahahaaaa...
Pruitt has forgotten more about biomechanics that you ever knew. You fail. Try harder next time.
Did Cancellara follow Pruitt's advice, did he go lower and faster.
swampy1970 said:Hahahahaaaa...
Pruitt has forgotten more about biomechanics that you ever knew. You fail. Try harder next time.
I don't know - but he did win the prologue in the Amgen TOC again, just hours prior to coming down with a fever...n crowley said:Did Cancellara follow Pruitt's advice, did he go lower and faster.
swampy1970 said:I don't know - but he did win the prologue in the Amgen TOC again, just hours prior to coming down with a fever...
It might be an issue with neck strength and being able to keep your head up with a lower bar/stem position. That's the only thing that springs to mind for me...n crowley said:I can't understand how (according to Pruitt), when you have got your ideal powerful TT position, you should not use it in the longer TT's. If it can't be used in the longer TT's, it can't be the perfect position.
Really? It doesn't make sense to use a more aggressive position for a 4-min event vs. a 1-hr event? That was the one part that seemed pretty informative to me.n crowley said:I can't understand how (according to Pruitt), when you have got your ideal powerful TT position, you should not use it in the longer TT's. If it can't be used in the longer TT's, it can't be the perfect position.
Not that this has anything to do with the thread... Andy is also an amputee and a damn strong one. He smoked me and a bunch of other riders in a crit back in ~'85-'87 with one good leg.frenchyge said:When did he get his PhD in stating the obvious?
frenchyge said:Really? It doesn't make sense to use a more aggressive position for a 4-min event vs. a 1-hr event? That was the one part that seemed pretty informative to me.
Where did you read anything about there being one ideal powerful TT position?
Ahh, okay. I misinterpreted your previous post as attributing the concept to Pruitt.n crowley said:In cycling mag. articles about Anquetil but I had to make my own discoveries. No guesswork there, his high gear TT pedalling controlled everything and was a self bike set-up and position setting technique.
I meant no offense towards his limb-status or riding abilities with my comment. Honestly, I meant no offense at all, and hopefully a reknown expert in his field can recognize the humor intended, or at least has a sufficiently thick skin against comments from such a peanut gallery as this.dkrenik said:... Andy is also an amputee and a damn strong one. He smoked me and a bunch of other riders in a crit back in ~'85-'87 with one good leg.
I don't see how anything you wrote could be interpreted that way?frenchyge said:I meant no offense towards his limb-status or riding abilities with my comment. Honestly, I meant no offense at all, and hopefully a reknown expert in his field can recognize the humor intended, or at least has a sufficiently thick skin against comments from such a peanut gallery as this.
Yeah, I know, and I don't think Dave was necessarily trying to insinuate that either (despite seemingly posting his statement in response to my comment). I just figured I'd take the opportunity to clear the air, since my real suspicion is that the cyclingnews writer is probably the one to blame for making the whole affair sound so silly.Alex Simmons said:I don't see how anything you wrote could be interpreted that way?
All we did was say that he stated the bleeding obvious, i.e. that the best TT rider in the current pro ranks would make a good TT rider.
I don't recall any questioning of his physical abilities or riding experience. Doesn't mean he doesn't have good thing to say about biomechanics etc.
Absolutely. I just mentioned Andy's condition as an aside. Nothing more, nothing less.frenchyge said:Yeah, I know, and I don't think Dave was necessarily trying to insinuate that either (despite seemingly posting his statement in response to my comment). I just figured I'd take the opportunity to clear the air, since my real suspicion is that the cyclingnews writer is probably the one to blame for making the whole affair sound so silly.
Alex Simmons said:All we did was say that he stated the bleeding obvious, i.e. that the best TT rider in the current pro ranks would make a good TT rider.
QUOTE]
Funny that Pruitt mentioning that Cancellara's strength and flexibility being a positive thing was seen as "bleeding obvious" given that a majority of cyclist are neither strong or flexible. Sure he's the current "Mr Chrono" but I think he was more describing some of the the physical traits that he has that many of his peers don't have.
Besides, I don't know many guys who are 6ft 1 that are that flexible, especially ones that weigh as much as he does (~180lbs / 80Kg)
swampy1970 said:"Dr Andy Pruitt, EdD, PA, is the Director of the Boulder Center for Sports Medicine. He is a former cycling competitor and has been in Sports Medicine for 35 years. His biomechanical interest started while he was at the University of Colorado, and in 1985 he began working with an Israeli biomechanist in digitising and analysing data on cyclists.
In the years since he has dealt with a huge number of cyclists, including big US names such as Lance Armstrong, Greg LeMond, Floyd Landis, Bobby Julich and Christian Vande Velde, plus the Italian rider Damiano Cunego. He is regarded as arguably the world's foremost authority on bike fit, and has a long running association with Specialized. He played a big role in designing the company's Body Geometry shoes, which feature a number of ergonomic enhancements."
Now, I don't know if he really is that good but I think from the short bio you get the idea... He certainly aint some nujack who digs measuring angles 'n ****.
Ever been to a yoga class?swampy1970 said:Besides, I don't know many guys who are 6ft 1 that are that flexible, especially ones that weigh as much as he does (~180lbs / 80Kg)
Sorry mate but that is pure drivel. I would explain further but ought not have to. Drivel.swampy1970 said:Funny that Pruitt mentioning that Cancellara's strength and flexibility being a positive thing was seen as "bleeding obvious" given that a majority of cyclist are neither strong or flexible. Sure he's the current "Mr Chrono" but I think he was more describing some of the the physical traits that he has that many of his peers don't have.
Besides, I don't know many guys who are 6ft 1 that are that flexible, especially ones that weigh as much as he does (~180lbs / 80Kg)
You're right, it doesn't. I guess that someone of Pruitt's predigree should listen to people on this board.Alex Simmons said:Ever been to a yoga class?
My problem is the false syllogism:
1. Cancellara is a great TT rider
2. Cancellara is very flexible
3. Therefore great TT riders are very flexible.
3. doesn't follow from 1 & 2.
Weren't there a couple distinctly non-flexible American tour riders in the last few years back who were pretty successful at time trials as well? Nahhh.... probably just my imagination.swampy1970 said:But maybe the fact that the two riders who earned the nickname "Mr Chrono" in the past two decades, Cancellara and Boardman, are both seriously flexible is just a sheer coincidence. Maybe that Hinault mentioned that flexibility was very important was just a covert ploy to distract is opponents into wasting time stretching when they could be getting in extra miles. I've read that LeMond put some merit to it as well...
No, it's probably that Pruitt has been misrepresented.swampy1970 said:You're right, it doesn't. I guess that someone of Pruitt's predigree should listen to people on this board.
frenchyge said:Weren't there a couple distinctly non-flexible American tour riders in the last few years back who were pretty successful at time trials as well? Nahhh.... probably just my imagination.
After reading the entire article, I just feel bad for those poor Schleck boys who'll never amount to anything because of their poor flexibility.
I don't think he's been misrepresented, based upon what I've read of Pruitt's work in the past. If someone of Pruitt's stature says it's important and Keen/Boardman says it's important and should be worked at then who am I to argue otherwise?Alex Simmons said:No, it's probably that Pruitt has been misrepresented.
What's important is being sufficiently flexible to do the job. Riders want to go faster, not tuck their hands under their feet.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.