Bikerman2004 said:
Exactly what lies did Bush tell about Al Queda?
What lies about WMD did he tell? (remember the French and Russians said he had them as well)
Also what type of government do you recommend we have over here?
The bi-partisan Senate Committee investigating the Sept 11th 2001 attacks have reported two weeks ago that there was NO connection between Iraq and Al Quaeda.
The bi-partisan Senate Committee investigating the Sept 11th 2001 attacks have reported two weeks ago that there was NO financial, logistical or ideological support from Iraq given to Al Quaeda.
Bush, Rice, Powell, Rumsfeld and Cheney : all stated to camera throughout Sept 2002 and March 2003 that there was a direct linkage between the events of Sept 11th 2001 and Iraq.
They all said that Saddam had provided financial, logistical and ideological support to the SAUDI ARABIAN nationals who committed those atrocities on 11th Sept 2001.
Why did they all state this nonsense to camera ?
Who compelled them to do so ?
They repeatedly stated that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.
They provided written and verbal evidence to support this outlandish claim.
Powell went to the UN in February 2003 with "physical evidence showing WMD" as he stated in session.
It was fabricated evidence - dodgy evidence - it was lies.
The US authorities alleged that Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological weapons.
Remember all those letters containing powder that were sent to the Senate and Congress ?
President Putin in conference with Tony Blair stated to the international media
that in his opinion, Saddam did not possess WMD (he stated this when Blair was sent by Bush to drum up support for the "coalition for the willing").
Bush repeated lied over this whole issue of Iraq.
The question that needs to be answered is : was he provided with bad intelligence or did he knowingly lie ?
Either way he's in the stew : if it was bad intelligence, his inability to manage, his inability to test, verify, enquire as to the basis of that intelligence shows that he cannot manage and has bad judgement.
If he knowingly lied, well..........
Either way, he and his goverment screwed up.
What type of goverment do I recommend that you have in the USA ?
I think you need a President who is competent and who is capable of being
a manager and who can think.
Unfortunately, Bush isn't that man.
His professional career indicates to me a man who is not competent in the art of management.