D
DaveB
Guest
But why would you??
http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/workshop/4218427.html?series=27
DaveB
http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/workshop/4218427.html?series=27
DaveB
B
Bugbear
Guest
On Jul 5, 7:52 am, DaveB <[email protected]> wrote:
> But why would you??
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/workshop/4218427.html?se...
>
> DaveB
Ahh you beat me to it. I wouldn't want one of these coming from the
opposite direction on a bike path, but hey, it looks like it would be
fun to have a go in an open car park...
> But why would you??
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/workshop/4218427.html?se...
>
> DaveB
Ahh you beat me to it. I wouldn't want one of these coming from the
opposite direction on a bike path, but hey, it looks like it would be
fun to have a go in an open car park...
L
On Jul 5, 9:52 am, DaveB <[email protected]> wrote:
> But why would you??
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/workshop/4218427.html?se...
>
> DaveB
Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
> But why would you??
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/workshop/4218427.html?se...
>
> DaveB
Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
B
Bugbear
Guest
> Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
At least he isn't claiming that this is some revolutionary improvement
to the current design of the bicycle
L
On Jul 5, 11:16 am, Bugbear <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
>
> At least he isn't claiming that this is some revolutionary improvement
> to the current design of the bicycle
Wait until he goes on the New Inventors! ;-)
> > Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
>
> At least he isn't claiming that this is some revolutionary improvement
> to the current design of the bicycle
Wait until he goes on the New Inventors! ;-)
S
stu
Guest
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Jul 5, 11:16 am, Bugbear <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
> >
> > At least he isn't claiming that this is some revolutionary improvement
> > to the current design of the bicycle
>
> Wait until he goes on the New Inventors! ;-)
>
I'm waiting to see the footage when he gets a 80kph wind gust(head wind)
news:[email protected]...
> On Jul 5, 11:16 am, Bugbear <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
> >
> > At least he isn't claiming that this is some revolutionary improvement
> > to the current design of the bicycle
>
> Wait until he goes on the New Inventors! ;-)
>
I'm waiting to see the footage when he gets a 80kph wind gust(head wind)
L
On Jul 5, 1:51 pm, "stu" <[email protected]> wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...> On Jul 5, 11:16 am, Bugbear <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
>
> > > At least he isn't claiming that this is some revolutionary improvement
> > > to the current design of the bicycle
>
> > Wait until he goes on the New Inventors! ;-)
>
> I'm waiting to see the footage when he gets a 80kph wind gust(head wind)
I had 60kph gusts for headwinds on the way into work this morning, it
made for a very, very slow commute. Still, if it stays a westerly
I'll have a great tailwind to the post office then home.
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...> On Jul 5, 11:16 am, Bugbear <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Judging by the absence of brakes, speed isn't a problem.
>
> > > At least he isn't claiming that this is some revolutionary improvement
> > > to the current design of the bicycle
>
> > Wait until he goes on the New Inventors! ;-)
>
> I'm waiting to see the footage when he gets a 80kph wind gust(head wind)
I had 60kph gusts for headwinds on the way into work this morning, it
made for a very, very slow commute. Still, if it stays a westerly
I'll have a great tailwind to the post office then home.
Similar threads
