Feedback on Timex Bodylink system v Polar 720i

Discussion in 'Cycling Equipment' started by mmamster, Apr 1, 2004.

  1. mmamster

    mmamster New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi all

    I am looking at a HRM/decent timing watch for triathlon (summer) and bike training (summer/winter).

    I've seen a lot on the polar 720i and it looks very attractive. However have also recently seen the new 2004 timex system (see www.timex.com) which tracks distance covered by GPS. That appeals as no bike attachments would be needed to monitor speed/distance/HR calcs and it could be used to monitor distance while running (I am not aware 720i can do this). Also is cheaper by about 100 AUD. Already have cadence etc on the bike.

    Does anyone have one and can they comment please?

    Cheers

    MMAMSTER

    Beach Road rider!
     
    Tags:


  2. jasong

    jasong New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    How good is their heart rate monitor? I played with a Timex unit a year ago and that part was very bad. The Polars seem to be bombproof and recognized as the best, although frustrating since battery replacements require sending them in for service.

    It's cool seeing some new players come to the market for these products.
     
  3. chuy

    chuy New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    wait and get the s725i
     
  4. jasong

    jasong New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    The s725i really doesn't see to have significant improvement over the 720i. Just communicate with the Nokia phone and has their near wearlink transmitter.
     
  5. mmamster

    mmamster New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it might be smaller and lighter - we'll see!
     
  6. 9138cousins

    9138cousins New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    The 625X is out now which has most of the 720i features but also has the speed/cadence sensor for running. To me this was the only bonus that the Timex system had over Polar. However having owned a previous Timex Ironman HRM watch I would never go near them again. Very very bad product.... unreliable, inaccurate,chewed batteries and swallowed water. The 720 is comparison is indeed bombproof. If a 725X is coming I too would wait for that

    Your other option is to keep the polar for HRm and buy a GPS device for running like those small Garmond ones. They like Polar have been doing what they do best for 50 years unlike Timex who have done HRM watches for about 3 years---and it shows!
     
  7. Aztec

    Aztec New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    835
    Likes Received:
    0
    Check out the Ciclosport HAC4. Better bike functions than the Polar, about equal HR functions, very poor software.
     
  8. aaesteve

    aaesteve New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0

    I have been considering purchasing the s720i but the running speed and distance of the s625x really captured my attention.

    The s625X along with the optional cycling cross-functionality seems to provide everything needed for a triathlete.

    Do you have any idea or guess of the price that it'll have when it gets to the stores?

    The s725x, however doesn't seem to me such an improvement since it only provides mobile connectivity .
     
  9. pkonz

    pkonz New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have used both the Timex Bodylink and 720i and for cycling applications prefer the 720i. The graphical output to computer is much better than timex's and the altitude function is very useful. The Timex is ok for running or xc skiing where I've used it a fair bit but it is somewhat unreliable, the signal cuts in and out on the gps. I haven't had any trouble with timex's hr monitor but the polar is loaded with programablity eg for intervals etc.
    Peter
     
  10. sathomasga

    sathomasga New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wall Street Journal did a story a month or so ago comparing the Timex to the Garmin Forerunner 201. They seemed to feel the Timex was clunky, hard to use, and not very reliable, while the Garmin was just the opposite. Of course, the Garmin doesn't have a HRM.

    Stephen
     
  11. kleinrider

    kleinrider New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've been very pleased with my 720i. Haven't had a lick of problems with it. It comes with the speed/distance for the bike and the cadence sensor is around $40 USD, although I don't have it.

    I really like the programability of the Polar as was mentioned above.
     
Loading...
Loading...