Originally Posted by An old Guy . I don't know what tools you use, but according to my spread sheet 320w is 31.5mph. ..
Any tool that predicts speed from power without knowing a thing about the rider's: weight, size, position, equipment or without some way to estimate CdA including wheels, frame and helmet or Crr and without knowing anything about the altitude or air density he's racing is isn't worth using.
But from experience at 70kg and 5'10" on a full TT bike with deep front, disc in rear, aero helmet, skinsuit and booties with a field tested CdA in the vicinity of .235 m^2 and tires with a Crr of .005 on decent asphalt roads 320 watts doesn't get me anywhere near 30 mph without a stout tailwind on flat roads. Add the energy to start and turn around and neither 320 nor 340 is likely to get me through a 6.7km time trial in 8 minutes.
Try calculator over at: http://www.analyticcycling.com/ForcesPower_Page.html
Assuming he's lighter, and more aero than I am at 70 kg(total bike plus rider plus kit) and a CdA of .220 he'd still need 427 watts to hold 31.5 mph at sea level and that doesn't take into account the cost of accelerating at the start or turnaround.
Based on those same assumptions 320 watts yields a steady state speed of 12.7 m/s or 45.7 kph (28.3 mph) very fast for sure but even with those fairly generous assumptions and no time allowed for the start or turn around he's still looking at roughly 9 minutes not 8. Realistically anything sub 10 is probably a really fast ride for someone with that power but not a lot of TT experience and likely not a lot of time spent optimizing his aerodynamics or pacing.
I've known Giannip for several years and take his power numbers at face value. I expect he's seen those numbers more than once, whether he'll see them on race day in the aero bars is always another question but that's why we race instead of just sending power files in to the officials.
-Dave