General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Fitday Ground Turkey Values - Cooked versus Raw

Started by taddy · · Last activity · 2 posts · 246 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 June 2006
Last activity
4 June 2006
Original author
taddy
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
246
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm a little confused on determining the correct nutrition values from
    Fitday (and other food db's) for ground turkey. Here is an example:

    Poultry Food Products, Ground Turkey, Raw
    1 lb.
    Calories = 675.86

    Turkey, Ground
    16 oz. raw, yield cooked
    Calories = 559.3

    Poultry Food Products, Ground Turkey, Cooked
    yield from 1 lb. raw
    Calories = 775.5

    The first two entries make sense to me, 675 cals raw and 559 cals
    cooked for one pound of meat. I assume this indicates a little of the
    fat is cooked off resulting in fewer calories.

    But the third entry actually indicates more calories (775) AFTER
    cooking one pound of meat. Note that this is for a yield from one raw
    pound, not a pound of cooked meat.

    Can anyone explain this? Which values seem best to use? This seems to
    apply to a variety of ground meats. Thanks for any info.

  2. "taddy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm a little confused on determining the correct nutrition values from
    Fitday (and other food db's) for ground turkey. Here is an example:

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Can anyone explain this? Which values seem best to use? This seems to
    apply to a variety of ground meats. Thanks for any info.

    Here's my guess:

    Is it because when you cook the meat, some of the weight from that meat
    renders off as fat and it also loses water weight due to evaporation, and
    then you have to add more meat to make up for the weight it lost during
    cooking?

    That would mean that to get a whole pound of cooked meat, you'd have to
    start out with more than a pound to account for the weight of the fat and
    water that's lost during cooking?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.