limerickman said:Hold up here.
You chimed in with your "for the record, I support the Pope's comments".
You chimed in with this "vote of support" after the Popes initial addresson 12/09/06, but before any further statement was made by the Pope on 17/09/06.
No, you hold up here...Yes and I stand by my vote for the record. The "further statement" which you refer was only released after Muslims around the world started burning his likeness and issuing death threats. Tell me Lim, would the Pope had made a "further statement" as you call it, if the Muslim world had remained silent?
Quoted post said:Listen - you didn't understand the Popes speech at Regensberg.
Oh, I understood it, and BTW who made you the Popes personal interpreter? Are you ST. Lim now??
Quoted post said:Do you know who is responsible for the murder of the nun ?
Yeah, some psycho with a gun who was influenced by jihad.
Quoted post said:If person responsible for this murder should be brought to justice - then the full rigours of the law should apply.
I hope that in this case the culprit will be brought to justice.
I think we would both agree here..
Quoted post said:And that's right you posted your initial comments BEFORE the murder of that nun.
This has no bearing on what I stated...You are grasping here. I mean, my "initial" comments are just that...When you refer to "initial" comments, that statement indicates that there are comments following the "initial" comment thus the likelyhood that something would transpire after the "initial" comment is quite likely...Perhaps you should play the lottery today for you are on a roll.....
No intiating a debate/argument with you.
Just pointing out the fact that you haven't got a clue.[/QUOTE]