I am just getting back into biking after a eight year hiatus. I'm a budget, but have a serious need to upgrade, and should know better than to try to do things on a shoe string, but here it is.
I have two old bikes. One is a Diamondback interval that I purchased in 1994, rode it for many miles, but always felt that I was lugging a weight around. The bike is still stock with Shimano 300ex. The other is a Centurion Iron Man that I purchased this spring at a garage sale with a Suntour rear derailuer on a six speed cassette, shimano 105 crank and front derauleur. The seatpost is aluminum, and the headset is Richey along with upgraded stem (Profile Design) and graphite handlebar that is too wide for me. The wheels are UKAI, and I suspect very light. The problem is that after riding the Iron Man for some time, I realize that it is too small for me. The top tube is one inch shorter than the Diamondback that I have ridden for years, and the wheelbase is a full two inches shorter. In short, I am cramping in my back and neck. I love the weight of the Centurion, it's a feather.
Are all steel frames the same in terms of weight (the Centurion appears to be made of smaller tubing probably making it lighter). Would it make sense to trade components by moving the lighter components to the Diamondback? Would it make sense to keep the original crank on the Diamondback or go through the trouble of trading the crank and bottom bracket as well? Ultimately, would I end up with a bike that would be light enough to satisfy me...similar to the Centurion only better in size? Would the centurion then ba saleable (the previous owner re-painted and put in corrosion resistor because he hated the wild color scheme of the original bike, so it has no decals left on it)?