A
Appkiller
Guest
So, after a group ride the other day a dude was checking out
my ride and asked if it was stiff. Hell yes it is,
especially in the bb. He looked at my chainstays and
commented that the large profile of the chainstay was
responsible for this stiffness. Hmmm. These are lenticular
(Foco) in shape with the long axis in the vertical plane and
not exceptionally wide in the horizontal plane.
I was about to contradict him, but decided not to as it
really didn't matter whether or not he understood bicycle
design. AFAIK, the horizontal width of the chainstay will
determine the relative stiffness of the bb, kinda like the
concept behind "bi-ovalized" down tubes. I would agree the
addition of more material in the vertical plane will add a
wee bit of stiffness in the horizontal plane, but not nearly
as much as if the same amount of material was added in the
horizontal plane.
I would also assert that the stiffness in the bb had much
more to do with the advent of the super strong air-hardened
steels (thermacrom, 853, S3) than anything else.
Was I smart to not contradict him because:
A. I would have looked like an idiot and the above blather
is all wrong?
-OR-
B. Direct contradiction (even if correct) of an assertion of
someone you just met can alienate them?
Just wondering,
App
my ride and asked if it was stiff. Hell yes it is,
especially in the bb. He looked at my chainstays and
commented that the large profile of the chainstay was
responsible for this stiffness. Hmmm. These are lenticular
(Foco) in shape with the long axis in the vertical plane and
not exceptionally wide in the horizontal plane.
I was about to contradict him, but decided not to as it
really didn't matter whether or not he understood bicycle
design. AFAIK, the horizontal width of the chainstay will
determine the relative stiffness of the bb, kinda like the
concept behind "bi-ovalized" down tubes. I would agree the
addition of more material in the vertical plane will add a
wee bit of stiffness in the horizontal plane, but not nearly
as much as if the same amount of material was added in the
horizontal plane.
I would also assert that the stiffness in the bb had much
more to do with the advent of the super strong air-hardened
steels (thermacrom, 853, S3) than anything else.
Was I smart to not contradict him because:
A. I would have looked like an idiot and the above blather
is all wrong?
-OR-
B. Direct contradiction (even if correct) of an assertion of
someone you just met can alienate them?
Just wondering,
App