Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Frame or components?

Started by Ralph Barone · · Last activity · 3 posts · 246 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
26 September 2007
Last activity
26 September 2007
Original author
Ralph Barone
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
246
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As I mentioned in a previous thread (Recommendation for entry level road
    bike), I'm looking to buy my first new bike in over 25 years. I would
    like to get some insight into the relative importance of frame materials
    and construction vs. components on the relative "goodness" of a bike.
    Once you get past the minimum acceptable levels of quality (and there's
    probably some debate about where the "minimum acceptable level of
    quality" is), where should my money go? Also, in a sub-$1,000 road
    bike, how much am I paying for the frame vs the components?

  2. Ralph Barone said:

    As I mentioned in a previous thread (Recommendation for entry level road
    bike), I'm looking to buy my first new bike in over 25 years. I would
    like to get some insight into the relative importance of frame materials
    and construction vs. components on the relative "goodness" of a bike.
    Once you get past the minimum acceptable levels of quality (and there's
    probably some debate about where the "minimum acceptable level of
    quality" is), where should my money go? Also, in a sub-$1,000 road
    bike, how much am I paying for the frame vs the components?

    In that category, the frame is a very small portion of the cost. I
    think I read that a welded aluminum frame costs about $4 in Chinese
    material and labor. Probably $25 for the distributor by the time it's
    painted and prepped.

    I'd guess the breakdown is something like 10% frame, 30% fork (if it's
    carbon) 60% parts.

    And where should the money go? Interface items - seat, bars and
    brifters make the biggest difference. I think paying more for Tiagra
    vs. Sora's a good idea, since Tiagras can be shifted from more bar
    positions. After that, wheels. Light can be cheap and sturdy can be
    cheap, but light & sturdy costs more.

  3. Ralph Barone said:

    As I mentioned in a previous thread (Recommendation for entry level road
    bike), I'm looking to buy my first new bike in over 25 years. I would
    like to get some insight into the relative importance of frame materials
    and construction vs. components on the relative "goodness" of a bike.
    Once you get past the minimum acceptable levels of quality (and there's
    probably some debate about where the "minimum acceptable level of
    quality" is), where should my money go? Also, in a sub-$1,000 road
    bike, how much am I paying for the frame vs the components?

    Bikes are sold and ugraded by components but these are really
    consumables and in the modern bike biz, it's backwards.The heart of
    the bike is the frame and fork, followed by the wheels. Fit is
    everything, everything else is secondary. If two bikes have identical
    frames and forks, both fit but one has an upgraded rear derailleur(a
    favorite of trekspecializedgiantcannondale), get the less expensive
    one...as long as it fits. Like before, you buy the bike shop as much
    as or more than the bike. One that does a good fit, will swap stems,
    saddles to get it right, etc., regardless of how much the bike costs,
    plus provide good afterthesale service is the one to buy from.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.