Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Frame Sizes

Started by \\¯`·.¸Biz¸.·´¯ · · Last activity · 4 posts · 821 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
6 May 2004
Last activity
7 May 2004
Original author
\\¯`·.¸Biz¸.·´¯
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
821
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi

    As a bit of a newb, looking to buy a bike, I was wondering
    if someone could offer me some info...

    Going by traditional sizing methods to check which size of
    bike I'd need; having a long inner leg measurement I find
    that a 21" or 22" would be about the correct size.

    Looking at the multitude of bikes/frames/kits available,
    there are plenty of Front susp bikes with this frame size.
    However, the Dual susp bikes only seem to go up to 19"
    frame sizes (there are one or two 20" models I have found,
    but not many).

    My question is: Are dual susp bikes measured differently? ie
    are they deliberately shorter for off-road purposes, or am I
    just looking in the wrong places?

    I want a bike to use for mild/moderate off-road use, as well
    as cross country trailing - so am I probably better off
    sticking with a hard tail frameset?

    Thanks in advance.

    biz

  2. \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/ said:

    My question is: Are dual susp bikes measured differently?
    ie are they deliberately shorter for off-road purposes, or
    am I just looking in the wrong places?

    There are very few "standards" in the bike business, and
    "bike sizing" is one clear example.

    The "size" measurements all start from the center of the
    bottom bracket (or crank bolt, if you prefer), and run along
    the centerline of the seat tube to:

    a) center of the top tube (the most useful if you're
    cutting tubes to build frames, but kinda meaningless to
    the rider since he/she doesn't really care where the
    center of the tube is)

    b) top of the top tube (this one is IMHO the best since it
    tells you where the part of the tube you need to worry
    about is located)

    c) top of the seat tube (this one makes no sense at
    all, IMHO).

    I suspect the thing that's confusing you is that the FS
    bikes tend to be "smaller" from a frame measurement
    perspective because the bottom bracket is higher (otherwise
    you'd be dragging your cranks through the mud when the
    suspension compresses). That means that a given size rider
    will ride a "smaller" FS bike than he/she would a hard tail.

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of
    the $695 ti frame

  3. \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/ said:

    Going by traditional sizing methods to check which size of
    bike I'd need; having a long inner leg measurement I find
    that a 21" or 22" would be about the correct size.

    Not sure what you mean by traditional. If you mean using
    some goofy math against your inseam to pop out a frame size,
    well, don't do that.

    The first measurement you should look at to compare frames
    is effective top tube length. If a bike is close to the
    right length for you, swapping stems and moving the saddle
    around on the seatpost clamp can help you make the fit
    perfect. If the bike is the wrong length by more than .75"
    or so, there's only so much you can do. Seat tube height is
    really a bad measurement to use to compare bikes (tradition
    be damned) since you can "fix" the vertical fit just by
    changing seat height, and lengths vary by mfger.

    Full suspension bikes don't necessarily have a complete
    "seat tube", so often the sizing is going to S, M, L, XL.
    And that makes a TON more sense than talking about a 19"
    bike (when one mfger's 19 has a 24.25" effective top tube
    and another mfger's 19 has a 23.5" ett).

    Since you admit that you are something of a newb, here's the
    best advice for you. FIND A GOOD BIKE SHOP. Not just a
    pretty shop that has the brands you like, but a shop that
    has people who KNOW bike fitting. Especially if your body
    proportions are atypical, you need the help of someone who
    knows how to fit people to bikes. In person. And then you
    need to test ride many bikes.
    --
    Tom Purvis - arkansasvalley.nettpurvis
    "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
    certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."-Bertrand Russell

  4. "Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home
    of the $695 ti frame

    "Tom Purvis" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Tom Purvis - arkansasvalley.nettpurvis "The
    whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics
    are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so
    full of doubts."-Bertrand Russell

    Thanks guys, advice taken on board. cheers biz

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.