M
Michael Fischbe
Guest
W K <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thats different from expressing a view. France said "hey ... does this need to be done now ... so
> fast". If that election went the other way I doubt that it would have been now and so fast.
> Otherwise there would be no difference between the two US parties.
No, that's *not* what France said. What France said was closer to "there is no way we will endanger
our lucrative contracts with Iraq by ever supporting any military action against them, regardless of
their aggression, conduct, or support of terrorism."
There *were* many countries that expressed the attitude you describe above. But not France.
mike
--
Mike Fischbein [email protected] Any opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of any other
entity. They may not even be mine.
> Thats different from expressing a view. France said "hey ... does this need to be done now ... so
> fast". If that election went the other way I doubt that it would have been now and so fast.
> Otherwise there would be no difference between the two US parties.
No, that's *not* what France said. What France said was closer to "there is no way we will endanger
our lucrative contracts with Iraq by ever supporting any military action against them, regardless of
their aggression, conduct, or support of terrorism."
There *were* many countries that expressed the attitude you describe above. But not France.
mike
--
Mike Fischbein [email protected] Any opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of any other
entity. They may not even be mine.