Quoted post said:Originally Posted by mjperk [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]
The tube is 1 1/8" I believe, so no issue there. I'm confused as to why you suggest using an MTB fork for 26"--wouldn't this actually change height more? I'm not sure what is meant by "probably have a greater dropout to shoulder distance." Sorry, I'm pretty green to bike terminology.
I've seen a few road bike forks with tabs for sale--why not just use them? If I could find a 700C road bike fork with a tab, wouldn't this be my best bet, or is the issue just that; finding one?
Some MTB forks are suspension corrected, and some aren't ...
- if the Rigid 26er MTB fork is suspension corrected, then it will probably change the height more than a 700c fork by about 2", +/- ...
- however, some Rigid 26er MTB forks are not suspension corrected ... my recollection is that a contemporary ROAD fork + the lower portion of the headset is about 15" between the axle & the frame (a hidden headset will be different because the bearings are inside the head tube) ...
- for a non-suspension corrected, the combined length of a Rigid MTB fork + the lower portion of the headset is something like 15.5" ...
- basically, by my reckoning, a 700c fork designed for CX or Touring is dimensionally similar to a vintage 27" fork and that combined length is about 16" ...
The "Stack Height" of different headsets varies (more so with threaded headsets) & there are certainly some other unforeseeable variations which may be due to the whim of the manufacturer or frame builder ...
And, MY memory could be faulty ...
Consequently, ALL OF THOSE APPROXIMATIONS COULD BE WRONG & SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE DEFINITIVE!!!
Lastly, is there a standard axle width? It seems like from what I'm reading 135mm is the standard for discs vs. 130mm for regular brakes.
Basically, for all intents & purposes, you are correct if you are looking at a snapshot in time of what's what in the 'World of Cycling' & limiting that view to off-the-peg MTBs & Road bikes ...
However, the "standards" are different for different eras AND for different types of bikes ...
In the post-War era, ~120mm was (AFAIK) the "standard" width for the rear dropout spacing ... and, I think that 120mm persisted as the rear dropout spacing until the mid-70s.
My recollection is that Touring bikes have had 135mm rear spacing since the mid-80s (possibly, the early 80s) at a time when Road bikes still had 126mm rear dropout spacing.
Until recently, all CX frames had 130mm rear spacing ...
- I have heard rumors of Road bikes going to 135mm for at least a decade ...
But, 130mm as the rear dropout width for Road bikes has managed to persist as the "standard" for the past 12+ years ... but, 135mm could certainly supesede 130mm if someone wins a TdF on a bike with disc brakes (THAT will be subject to approval by the sanctioning bodies, of course, which may never come ... ) OR if Shimano and/or Campagnolo agree to go to a 14-speed Cassette!?!