Originally, Mt. bikes didn't have suspension. I know because I have an early Stumpjumper with a unicrown chrome-molly fork. I took that bike to Moab and played around on the Slick Rock Trail and did the White Rim Trail on it. The reality is, you can do a lot without suspension. You just spend more time out of the saddle and have to go slower on rough ground. There are actually advantages to a "rigid" fork, which would now be carbon fiber.. For one, on small bumps, it's probably less rigid than a suspension fork, especially if the suspension is locked out for climbing. For another a carbon fiber rigid fork saves quite a bit of weight. Plus, no pogoing.
The MTB I use now is a hard tail. I like it quite a bit but the ride is pretty harsh and I'm getting old.
I'm considering going with one of the two extremes on my next MTB. Full suspension or no suspension. I'm considering no suspension because, now, with carbon frame and fork, it would be super light and the ride wouldn't be that bad. I think my days of anything approaching hard core off road are over. I mostly ride my MTB on pretty easy trails and often have to ride on pavement to get there.
Thoughts?
The MTB I use now is a hard tail. I like it quite a bit but the ride is pretty harsh and I'm getting old.
I'm considering going with one of the two extremes on my next MTB. Full suspension or no suspension. I'm considering no suspension because, now, with carbon frame and fork, it would be super light and the ride wouldn't be that bad. I think my days of anything approaching hard core off road are over. I mostly ride my MTB on pretty easy trails and often have to ride on pavement to get there.
Thoughts?