G
Gawnsoft
Guest
On 17 Aug 2004 09:31:11 GMT, Andy Leighton <[email protected]>
wrote (more or less):
>On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:21 +0100,
> Call me Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
>> inconsiderate. Particularly as this small measure causes them
>> virtually no inconvenience at all.
>
>Except if they want to reply by email. It then causes a small amount
>of inconvenience. If everyone uses their own type of spam-trap that
>inconvenience is increased as someone has to work out how to de-spam
>trap your address.
And if everyone spamtrapped their email address in the same way, it
would be automatically-undoable and so not be spamtrapped...
....
--
Cheers,
Euan
Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr
Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122
Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk
wrote (more or less):
>On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:00:21 +0100,
> Call me Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
>> inconsiderate. Particularly as this small measure causes them
>> virtually no inconvenience at all.
>
>Except if they want to reply by email. It then causes a small amount
>of inconvenience. If everyone uses their own type of spam-trap that
>inconvenience is increased as someone has to work out how to de-spam
>trap your address.
And if everyone spamtrapped their email address in the same way, it
would be automatically-undoable and so not be spamtrapped...
....
--
Cheers,
Euan
Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr
Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122
Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk
