P
Pistof
Guest
"Pistof" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Dave Salovesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] opined:
> >
> > > So much for the vaunted angled brackets! I was grossly
> > > deceived about their power to contain even the longest
> > > url.
> >
> > Standard practice uses more than just angle brackets. It
> > also includes "url:" prefixed to the actual URI, and
> > harks back to a time when there may have actually been a
> > need to explain that something like http://www.yahoo.com
> > was a URL and not, well, something else. So:
> >
> >
>
<url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20c7afc9.03100702-
17.14e5a004%40pos
> ting.google.com&output=gplain>
>
>
<url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20c7afc9.03100702-
17.14e5a004%40pos
> ting.google.com&output=gplain>
url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20c7afc9.031007021-
7.14e5a004%40post ing.google.com&output=gplain
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Dave Salovesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] opined:
> >
> > > So much for the vaunted angled brackets! I was grossly
> > > deceived about their power to contain even the longest
> > > url.
> >
> > Standard practice uses more than just angle brackets. It
> > also includes "url:" prefixed to the actual URI, and
> > harks back to a time when there may have actually been a
> > need to explain that something like http://www.yahoo.com
> > was a URL and not, well, something else. So:
> >
> >
>
<url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20c7afc9.03100702-
17.14e5a004%40pos
> ting.google.com&output=gplain>
>
>
<url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20c7afc9.03100702-
17.14e5a004%40pos
> ting.google.com&output=gplain>
url:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20c7afc9.031007021-
7.14e5a004%40post ing.google.com&output=gplain