Would any one like to debate as to wether GWB. is a war criminal or not You can take a guess at the position I might take.
ryan_velo. said:Would any one like to debate as to wether GWB. is a war criminal or not You can take a guess at the position I might take.
Daft question asking me that one. Can you substantiate a case for your accusations?ryan_velo. said:Would any one like to debate as to wether GWB. is a war criminal or not You can take a guess at the position I might take.
ryan_velo. said:Would any one like to debate as to wether GWB. is a war criminal or not You can take a guess at the position I might take.
I am waiting to see how being in Iraq Likens GWB to a war criminal. Give me examples of how you are making this correlation...tell me anything because I am waiting to pounce!!!!ryan_velo. said:So what are we doing in Iraq?
No, I want you to tell me what the US. is doing in Iraq. I'll get to my point just answer the question.jaguar75 said:I am waiting to see how being in Iraq Likens GWB to a war criminal. Give me examples of how you are making this correlation...tell me anything because I am waiting to pounce!!!!
I think we've covered a lot of this ground before, or at least it has been discussed elsewhere to some degree. You are in this instance Mr Accusator appearing before me Lord Justice Fred of Surrey to state your unsubstantiated case to accuse a Mr Bush of war crimes of which you have no evidence. This is indeed a frivolous and expensive venture of the Courts time and rota. All the costs are against you. You cannot come to the Royal Courts of Justice to ask me and the Judical system what someone is doing in Iraq. That's nearly as nosey as asking me which is my favourite lunch venue, or spanking club.ryan_velo. said:No, I want you to tell me what the US. is doing in Iraq. I'll get to my point just answer the question.
FredC said:I think we've covered a lot of this ground before, or at least it has been discussed elsewhere to some degree. You are in this instance Mr Accusator appearing before me Lord Justice Fred of Surrey to state your unsubstantiated case to accuse a Mr Bush of war crimes of which you have no evidence. This is indeed a frivolous and expensive venture of the Courts time and rota. All the costs are against you. You cannot come to the Royal Courts of Justice to ask me and the Judical system what someone is doing in Iraq. That's nearly as nosey as asking me which is my favourite lunch venue, or spanking club.
Case for impeachment against the Lyin' King and/or his Admin.:FredC said:I think we've covered a lot of this ground before, or at least it has been discussed elsewhere to some degree. You are in this instance Mr Accusator appearing before me Lord Justice Fred of Surrey to state your unsubstantiated case to accuse a Mr Bush of war crimes of which you have no evidence. This is indeed a frivolous and expensive venture of the Courts time and rota. All the costs are against you. You cannot come to the Royal Courts of Justice to ask me and the Judical system what someone is doing in Iraq. That's nearly as nosey as asking me which is my favourite lunch venue, or spanking club.
Yes. He has taken a situation, 9/11, & used it to suit his & his administration's (full of [it] yes-men) idealogical goals , at the expense of young men & women in the armed services. He better hope he was wrong about his alleged beleif in his chosen deity because if he isn't, there's going to be hell to pay son, hell to pay.ryan_velo. said:Would any one like to debate as to wether GWB. is a war criminal or not You can take a guess at the position I might take.
Would any of these apply to his compadre Ariel Sharon?Wurm said:Case for impeachment against the Lyin' King and/or his Admin.:
1. Complicity in 9/11 disaster
2. Claims of Iraq WMD's and other lies to American public for making war
3. Invasion of sovereign nation without provocation
4. Torture at Abu Gharaib, Gitmo, A'stan, & sending of detainees to Syria and Egypt for torture
5. Outing of Valerie Plame
6. Halliburton
7. Billions of missing monies vis-a-vis Iraq
The list goes on...
Its not that they lie so much, it is their utter contempt for the truth. If it weren't for 9/11 he'd be back in Crawford right now but because of the situation he was able to exploit it to further the use of the military industrial complex (sending kids to die while filling the coffers of defense contractors). Incidentally, the outing of a CIA officer & the subsequent attack of the messenger (reporter) is especially loathsomeWurm said:Case for impeachment against the Lyin' King and/or his Admin.:
1. Complicity in 9/11 disaster
2. Claims of Iraq WMD's and other lies to American public for making war
3. Invasion of sovereign nation without provocation
4. Torture at Abu Gharaib, Gitmo, A'stan, & sending of detainees to Syria and Egypt for torture
5. Outing of Valerie Plame
6. Halliburton
7. Billions of missing monies vis-a-vis Iraq
The list goes on...
FredC said:Daft question asking me that one. Can you substantiate a case for your accusations?
Very interesting question. I'm not defending SH. He was a really bad guy who was helped along, incidentally, by george Bush's cabinet in the past (Wolfowitz/Rumsfeld/Perle). How nice of them to clean up their mess at the expense of our int'l credibility. If country's could be invaded because we didn't approve of their leader or because they systematically utilized torture, guess who would be next on the invasion list Ourselvesjhuskey said:Has anyone ever been convicted of war crimes in a war that they didn't lose?
Good point. But it's still going on. What happens if it's a draw?jhuskey said:Has anyone ever been convicted of war crimes in a war that they didn't lose?
FredC said:Good point. But it's still going on. What happens if it's a draw?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.