Slash <
[email protected]> Had this to say
news:[email protected]:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:39:29 -0800, Slash <
[email protected]> scribbled:
>
>>Friend of mine picked one up a little over a month ago. Nice light bike, seems to handle the hits
>>well and soaks up all the bumps that the trail throws up at you. He's on the opposite end of the
>>weight spectrum though (beanpole) at 6' and 150 or so. If you haven't already, I'd advise going to
>>a bike shop and telling them that you'd like to take it out for a test ride. Have them set up the
>>suspension for your weight and then take it out and bash it around. If they won't let you borrow
>>it for a few hours, at least give it a good thumping on some sidewalk dropoffs.
>>
>>Quite frankly, it's one of the best full suspension bikes you can buy for its price range and the
>>suspension design itself has been mountain biker tested and approved.
>>
>>-Slash
>
> Whoops! This is one of those classic "I should probably read the original message before replying"
> situations! My message refers to the Giant NRS 3, not the AC 3. Sorry! I'm going to go to my room
> now and break into tears of shame. And then fix my damn bike computer, wires are messed up or
> somethin', it won't take a reading at all. Hmm...
>
> -Slash
> --
> "Ebert Victorious"
>
> - The Onion
>
Hey, The XTC NRS 1 is a sweet ride as well.
The AC3 is speced wicked... if you get a good price then buy, but maybee you might want the 2003 )
should only be a small price diff.)