General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Glycemic Index Values Are Surprisingly Variable (maybe even unuseful)

Started by Jim · · Last activity · 1 post · 246 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 September 2007
Last activity
28 September 2007
Original author
Jim
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
246
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Rxtracts / Summary

    This report gives the inter- and intra -individual variations of
    glycemic index of white bread. Appears to clearly verify the
    (modified)common claim that "Your Mileage May Vary --- A Whole Bunch".

    "In our study the combined average was 71, virtually identical to the
    published value. However, quite strikingly, individual values ranged
    from 44 to 132. What is critical is to determine why there is such a
    wide range of responses among individuals.

    [ YMMV ]

    ....if a person eats a slice of turkey and cheese with that bread, the
    effect of the multiple foods may result in a different glycemic index
    than if that person had eaten the white bread alone. Since most food is
    consumed as combinations during meals and snacks, there is a need to
    assess the significance of using glycemic index values determined on
    individual foods for food mixtures. Similarly, it is important to know
    whether the food consumed prior to a meal or snack alters subsequent
    glycemic response.

    It is possible that we need to develop better research tools and more
    stringent applications for glycemic index determinations," she says.
    "Larger studies of diverse populations are needed to determine why
    inter-individual, and particularly intra-individual, glycemic index
    values are so variable....

    Reference: Vega-Lopez S, Ausman LM, Griffith JL, Lichtenstein AH.
    Diabetes Care. 2007 (June); 30 (6): 1412-1417. "Interindividual
    Variability and Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Glycemic Index
    Values for Commercial White Bread."

    [ They got a 5 year grant study from the National Institute of Diabetes
    and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to further their understanding of the
    glycemic index and its utilities. The current study was supported by the
    U.S. Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service. ]

    ================= End Extract / Summary =============

    Source: Tufts University, Health Sciences

    Glycemic Index Values Are Surprisingly Variable, Researchers Report

    Science Daily — In work investigating the reproducibility of glycemic
    index values, researchers at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition
    Research Center on Aging at Tufts University (USDA HNRCA) have reported
    that multiple glycemic index value determinations (measure of the rate
    of glucose absorption into the bloodstream) using a simple test food,
    white bread, resulted in a relatively high level of inter-individual
    (among different individuals), and intra-individual (within the same
    individual) variability.

    Further studies will focus on better defining the magnitude and the
    sources of the variability. The intent is to better understand how
    glycemic index relates to chronic disease risk in a wide range of
    individuals.

    Alice Lichtenstein, DSc, corresponding author and director of the
    Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory at the USDA HNRCA and colleagues
    assessed 14 study participants' glycemic response to 50 grams of
    carbohydrate in the form of white bread (test food) and glucose
    dissolved in water (control food) on different days. This experiment was
    repeated three times with each individual.

    "Using glucose as the control food, previous studies indicate that white
    bread has a glycemic index of about 70," says Lichtenstein, who is also
    the Gershoff professor of nutrition science and policy at the Friedman
    School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts. "In our study the
    combined average was 71, virtually identical to the published value.
    However, quite strikingly, individual values ranged from 44 to 132. What
    is critical is to determine why there is such a wide range of responses
    among individuals.

    In addition, within the same individual, test values varied by as much
    as 42 percent. "These results show that perhaps using glycemic index for
    groups is a reasonable indicator to predict chronic disease risk, but
    there is still considerable uncertainty when applying glycemic index to
    individuals," explains Lichtenstein.

    Glycemic index is a scale applied to foods based on how quickly the
    glucose in foods is absorbed into the blood stream, relative to pure
    glucose. Some nutrition professionals use the glycemic index as a tool
    for people trying to control blood sugar, such as those with diabetes.
    Others use the mean glycemic index of diets to predict chronic disease
    risk in large groups of people. Potential confounding factors, such as
    the fiber or fat content of the food, are not directly factored into the
    calculations.

    "There are many factors that can influence the glycemic index of a
    food," says Lichtenstein. "For example, a piece of white bread may have
    a high glycemic index but, if a person eats a slice of turkey and cheese
    with that bread, the effect of the multiple foods may result in a
    different glycemic index than if that person had eaten the white bread
    alone. Since most food is consumed as combinations during meals and
    snacks, there is a need to assess the significance of using glycemic
    index values determined on individual foods for food mixtures.
    Similarly, it is important to know whether the food consumed prior to a
    meal or snack alters subsequent glycemic response.

    It is possible that we need to develop better research tools and more
    stringent applications for glycemic index determinations," she says.
    "Larger studies of diverse populations are needed to determine why
    inter-individual, and particularly intra-individual, glycemic index
    values are so variable. If we can identify the source of the
    variability, it will allow for more insight into the applications of the
    glycemic index as a tool for both researchers and in public health
    messages."

    Lichtenstein and colleagues have received a five-year grant from the
    National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases to
    further their understanding of the glycemic index and its utilities. The
    current study was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
    Agricultural Research Service.

    Reference: Vega-Lopez S, Ausman LM, Griffith JL, Lichtenstein AH.
    Diabetes Care. 2007 (June); 30 (6): 1412-1417. "Interindividual
    Variability and Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Glycemic Index
    Values for Commercial White Bread."

    Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Tufts
    University, Health Sciences.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.