"What a load of ****. Show the refereed published studies that back up your claims. Without any proof, you're just hawking snake oil.What a load of ****. Show the refereed published studies that back up your claims. Without any proof, you're just hawking snake oil.What a load of ****. Show the refereed published studies that back up your claims. Without any proof, you're just hawking snake oil."
Refereed, published studies? What silliness. You don't know much about this topic, do you? The kind of big time, PEER REVIEWED, published studies you refer to are DRUG STUDIES. They are FDA-sanctioned studies of drugs only, that cost millions. We've seen the results of those--if you watch tv, you've seen the daily advertisements from lawyers looking for drug injury victims, all from peer-reviewed, FDA approved studies. Think "Thalidomide" and armless babies, and all of the other "approved" drugs that have gone down in flames after this same process of approval, long acknowledged to be corrupted by Big Pharma control over government agencies, medical schools and journals and the medical profession in general. All drugs are poisons by their very nature, which means they have side effects, and are geared towards "treatment", not cure (meaning the suppression of certain symptoms), often by damaging or destroying the immune system and thereby suppressing it's ability to produce symptoms associated with reacting to a condition of infection, toxicity or other form of disease. One of the greatest and most effective weapons of immune function is fire--fever and inflammation--which speeds up metabolism, kills pathogens, etc. So what do doctors do? Instead of controlling fever, they seek to suppress it. And yet, there have been medical studies using fever therapy to treat tumors and cancers, up to degrees of fever you wouldn't think the body could actually survive. So what did Glyoyxlide do? --through oxidation it generated a fever high enough to kill cancer cells selectively, because they are more heat-sensitive than healthy cells. That's the general idea behind radiation treatment, except that it doesn't target cancer that selectively. It also harms living, healthy tissues. I believe one cancer patient died during this homeopathically-induced fever (quite a feat for a remedy claimed to be nothing but distilled water or something to that effect), which got it banned. How many millions have died following radiation and chemo? But of course, that's different.
So, here you have one single homeopathic remedy created by one physician. Conventional medical sources would never allow a clinical study showing positive results to be published in a mainstream medical journal, although they might accept one showing negative or inconclusive results. Then you'd have to look at the criteria used to evaluate the results or lack thereof, or even how the trial was carried out, and by whom. I can't imagine it. Traditional homeopathy would result, hypothetically, in 20 different remedies for the same general symptoms in 20 people. For example, my mother had shingles so bad that the strongest pain medication prescribed to her couldn't cut through the pain enough to sleep through the night. It was horriffic! In desperation she finally agreed to see my naturopathic physician who was also a licensed homeopath. The traditional method of homeopathy requires hours of interview, but he had it put on computer. She had to answer over 500 questions, which took half the day. It was fed into the computer which then gave an analysis that listed the top 5 remedies that best fit her particular group of symptoms, physical, mental, and emotional. Out of those, he had to chose the one he felt was best suited to her. He did. Within hours the pain was gone, and by the next day all of her lesions were scabbing over and healing. She knew nothing about homeopathy, scoffed at the idea that those questions had anything to do with her disease, and refused to believe that the 5 tiny little pellets he put in her hand to dissolve under her tongue would do anything, but she was cured anyway. The point is, 20 different people with shingles would probably need 20 different remedies to treat it. How would you make a clinical study out of that?
One man couldn't pay for or arrange for a clinical trial of one single remedy that he owned and made. They would need a cohort of probably stage 4 cancer patients, all with the same kind of cancer, and half would receive a placebo in a double-blind study. Do you see that happening anytime soon? They probably do that with chemotheraputic agents, but that's Big Pharma testing something that can be patented (and the results tampered with, as they often are according to many a medical literature expose'). If they did do a clinical study which showed unbiased positive results, it would only be published in a journal of alternative medicine, and that would never be accepted by conventional medical sources no matter what.
The doctor who created the glyoxylide formula is long gone. The famous old naturopathic pioneer who used it is long gone. The naturopathic doctor who was doing a residency there and observed the quick cure of a cancer patient is dead and gone, although I might have that conversation on tape, since I did tape record most of my conversations with him. It was a comment made almost offhand, when we were talking about cancer therapies--a recollection of something he saw, using a remedy no longer available.
Do you know how homeopathic remedies are made? A tiny amount of the crude natural substance is mixed with an inert fluid and shaken (secussed), say 100 times. Then, one drop of that mixture is taken and put in another container of inert fluid and secussed the same number of times. Then one drop of that fluid is taken and put in a container ...that process is repeated a number of times until there is nothing or nearly nothing of the physical material remaining, which is why the older chemical tests could find nothing. But in this process something is released and absorbed or otherwise affects the diluting substance. I think of it like splitting the atom--an energy is released that is far more powerful when freed than when contained in the material matter, if that idea can be applied in a way that communicates the basic idea. Glyoxylide must have been different somehow, but most homeopathic remedies only have an effect when they are right, but this one seemed to cause an "oxidative fire" in most people, which meant it had some kind of general application. All I know is what I was told by someone who saw it used and had no reason to embellish or lie about it. He had his own highly successful cancer therapy, and was known as a "naturopathic oncology pioneer", and his melancholy sadness over this lost remedy was just that--he wished he had it as part of his own "arsenal" of cancer weapons, but it was long gone. I'm very lucky--he cured my stomach cancer in 5 weeks, but believe me if glyoxylide would have been available back then, I would have been begging for it. That was 5 weeks of major detoxing and treatments I wouldn't like to go through again, although having one's gut chewed up by cancer is not an alternative anyone in their right mind would choose.