J
Bill Sornson writes:
>>>>>> Maybe you've been living in a cave, Bill.
>>>>> No. That's precisely the problem with Billie: unlike his
>>>>> butt-boy in arms, Hickey, he's too stubborn to admit defeat and
>>>>> crawl back INTO his cave, along with all the other discredited
>>>>> ultra right, frothing at the mouth, Fox news, ditto head,
>>>>> so-called "Christian", neocon wacky jobs who have all but
>>>>> destroyed American credibility worldwide.
>>> Proof that the Left's goal is to force people to stay quiet.
>>> Perfect.
>>>> That pretty much sums it up.
>>> The crude hate and vitriol on the left? Yup.
>> I think you ought to look around and notice that you and one or two
>> others among all the writers here stand alone in your perception of
>> what our country is doing under the guidance of our president.
>> This may be a time to reassess your trust in GWB/Cheney (aka
>> Mephistopheles).
> That's a spearate issue from the lies and hypocrisy of the far left.
>> You haven't complained that this thread is off topic lately. I saw
>> that as another way of suppressing opinions when you used that in
>> the past to squelch political discussion opposed to your viewpoint.
>> Mark Hickey let the cat out of the bag and now you get to see how
>> that political perception goes with the majority of wreck.bike
>> folks.
> The entire thread was about Mark leaving and why.
> That's different from you introducing off-topic threads by posting
> 9-11 conspiracy links, for example (one of many).
The whole thread is about political postings and who said what. It's
all about the entire Bush administration that is about 911 and his war
in Iraq. Now don't tell me that Iraq has nothing to do with GWB's
perception of 911, and his impetus to go to war.
> But the next time someone posts a RIDE REPORT in rec.bicycles.misc,
> by all means be sure to snidely flame them for not putting it in
> rec.rides.
Maybe you can quote that posting to show that I flamed the writer of
that thread and that it wasn't eons ago. The exchanges here have been
full of rude name calling and insinuations, the likes of which never
appeared in anything I wrote. As I recall I asked the writer to also
post his ride report in that newsgroup (rec.bicycles.rides) so those
readers who are interested in ride reports won't miss it. I see no
flames in that request that seems to have occurred years ago... and
elephants never forget!
Jobst Brandt
>>>>>> Maybe you've been living in a cave, Bill.
>>>>> No. That's precisely the problem with Billie: unlike his
>>>>> butt-boy in arms, Hickey, he's too stubborn to admit defeat and
>>>>> crawl back INTO his cave, along with all the other discredited
>>>>> ultra right, frothing at the mouth, Fox news, ditto head,
>>>>> so-called "Christian", neocon wacky jobs who have all but
>>>>> destroyed American credibility worldwide.
>>> Proof that the Left's goal is to force people to stay quiet.
>>> Perfect.
>>>> That pretty much sums it up.
>>> The crude hate and vitriol on the left? Yup.
>> I think you ought to look around and notice that you and one or two
>> others among all the writers here stand alone in your perception of
>> what our country is doing under the guidance of our president.
>> This may be a time to reassess your trust in GWB/Cheney (aka
>> Mephistopheles).
> That's a spearate issue from the lies and hypocrisy of the far left.
>> You haven't complained that this thread is off topic lately. I saw
>> that as another way of suppressing opinions when you used that in
>> the past to squelch political discussion opposed to your viewpoint.
>> Mark Hickey let the cat out of the bag and now you get to see how
>> that political perception goes with the majority of wreck.bike
>> folks.
> The entire thread was about Mark leaving and why.
> That's different from you introducing off-topic threads by posting
> 9-11 conspiracy links, for example (one of many).
The whole thread is about political postings and who said what. It's
all about the entire Bush administration that is about 911 and his war
in Iraq. Now don't tell me that Iraq has nothing to do with GWB's
perception of 911, and his impetus to go to war.
> But the next time someone posts a RIDE REPORT in rec.bicycles.misc,
> by all means be sure to snidely flame them for not putting it in
> rec.rides.
Maybe you can quote that posting to show that I flamed the writer of
that thread and that it wasn't eons ago. The exchanges here have been
full of rude name calling and insinuations, the likes of which never
appeared in anything I wrote. As I recall I asked the writer to also
post his ride report in that newsgroup (rec.bicycles.rides) so those
readers who are interested in ride reports won't miss it. I see no
flames in that request that seems to have occurred years ago... and
elephants never forget!
Jobst Brandt
