Thanks for your response. May I ask, which model Smith & Wesson 9mm?kyperman said:S&W 9mm
Thanks for your response. May I ask, which model Smith & Wesson 9mm?kyperman said:S&W 9mm
I am from Australia. So what you are saying is that the gun would be the last resort?izatt82 said:i have not had to use mine in the civilian world and hope i never have too. Hopefully i can always use my mind and tact to work my way out. and thank god your not british and if you are american i'm glad i could defend your right to say such things. and you should be too.
right yeah i like to here other peoples opinion even stevebaby even though i give him ****. but yes my firearm is absolutly the last resort. if he has a knife i will disarm him or evade and contact the police. if i can not escape and my life is at threat then i shoot to kill. i do not just carry a firearm for myself but others as well. i also include martial arts and defence training along with carrying a firearm. I am not fighting a war i am just trying to survive until police get there. The main reason i carry is police as much as they might think are not every where. if i need to protect myself it may take them upto 5 to ten minutes where i live. and for anybody who's been in a fire fight in two minutes it's over in the streets so i'll be dead because they were not there. many people cannot preform under this kind of stress and some can. i'm not bashing anyone thats just the way it is. many people think they can and even with sim rounds couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. the other thing is people do not train for real life. in real life theres no earplugs but wear them if possible for training but im saying how many people have heard a shot in side a house. how many people have been wroke up too gunshots this is what i am talking about. I feel that i can protect myself with out a firearm as well. the best thing for defense in my opinion is krav maga it the real thing no **** just down and dirty. and as far as firearm ownership i grew up shooting ever since i was little. it's apart of mylife and i promote gun safety to every one i can. im not just some cowboy, and i try to introduce more kids to guns and safety so many kids now days need some discipline in there life and purpose. basically i have my own ROE rules of engagement. use only enough force to netrualize the situation. talk my way out if possible. if threat is a life threat to me or a bystandard then crush him by all means.thepeddler said:I am from Australia. So what you are saying is that the gun would be the last resort?
Here in Perth there is not a culture of gun ownership so this sort of discussion on a cycling forum would never come up. I am not condemning your way of life I just think it highlights just how people who are a lot alike can be so different.
I find Lott's arguments entirely convincing; and now carry a bucket of water with me for defence on account of it's enhanced lethality compared to handguns.stevebaby said:Quoting John Lott...PRICELESS!
Lott claimed to have conducted a survey on Defensive Gun Use in 1997 in which he claimed that there were more than 2 million instances of DGU each year in the US and 98% of those DGUs involved brandishing a gun, not actually firing it, to deter a criminal.
When Lott was challenged on the figure and asked to produce the raw data that the results were allegedly based on, he claimed that his computer had crashed and he had lost all the data!
Bwaahahahahahahah...the dog ate his homework!
Despite widespread publicity, Lott has never been able to produce a single piece of paper evidence of the alleged survey, nor has he been able to produce even 1 of the "10 unpaid student volunteers" who he claims assisted him and despite claiming that he had surveyed more than 2000 people...only one person (a pro-gun activist) has ever come forward who took part in the alleged survey.
Despite this, Lott continues to use the "2 million DGUs each year" figure as though it was scientific fact, when it is not.
Lott has also admitted fabricating an online persona named "Mary Rosh" who praises his work, claimed to be a former student of his, and urged people to buy his books.
Fabricating an online persona. Joe...how desperate can you get?
Good idea, Don! On your advice, I just bought a pair of suspenders (braces) and a couple of 2½ caliber...er...I mean 2½ gallon buckets to attach & create a CC double-shoulder-holster-water-bucket-rig for my rides. I suspect it will work well for MAC trucks, dogs, and female joggers. Not to mention that I can drink my ammo when thirsty. Maybe I should switch my ammo to sports drink?Don Shipp said:I find Lott's arguments entirely convincing; and now carry a bucket of water with me for defence on account of it's enhanced lethality compared to handguns.
Can anyone suggest a suitable CC rig?
Click on the link to the monster pig page. It will tell you all about it.CAMPYBOB said:
this thread is on page 6. apparently there's enough interest to keep it going. maybe move it to soapbox or something. but killing a popular thread because other members don't like it doesn't seem to make much sense.limerickman said:A number of cyclists here have requested that this thread should be terminated as guns are not cycling equipment.
(that's not an invitation to debate whether or not guns are cycling equipment).
Do members want this thread to continue?
As much as some Americans (such as Joe West/Jeepguy32) would have us believe that weapons are a part of cycling, this is an international forum and for most of the cycling world, weapons are not a part of cycling. The Second Amendment (Joe/Jeepguy's pet hobby-horse) is quite irrelevant to us.limerickman said:A number of cyclists here have requested that this thread should be terminated as guns are not cycling equipment.
(that's not an invitation to debate whether or not guns are cycling equipment).
Do members want this thread to continue?
It wasn't a wild pig. It was raised on a farm. Its name was Fred.izatt82 said:i just don't beleive it not a wild pig
stevebaby, My name is Jeff and I live in Kansas City. I am not Joe West. Also, please see Post 1, Paragraph 2 of this thread.stevebaby said:As much as some Americans (such as Joe West/Jeepguy32) would have us believe that weapons are a part of cycling, this is an international forum and for most of the cycling world, weapons are not a part of cycling. The Second Amendment (Joe/Jeepguy's pet hobby-horse) is quite irrelevant to us.
If anyone believes that their right to free speech is adversely affected, then they are free to go to Joe West's own forum (Arizona Virtual Gun Club) and discuss the issue there.Both gun threads are a troll by Joe, who has obviously realised that the membership on this forum vastly exceeds the membership on his own forum (at time of writing...64 members). Feel free to post on Joe's forum on cycling subjects.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.