Long before the current revelations I had concluded-based on a wealth of public knowledge, personal experience and my own somewhat unattractive cynicism-that in all probability no Grand Tour winner in history had ever won without the use of some form of PED. From strychnine laced champagne to EPO every era has had its own drugs of choice-albeit that we now have 'assistance' of an altogether more sophisticated and pervasive nature.
I was therefore a little surprised to hear Greg LeMond state in the Landis hearing that he had never used PEDs.This was probably not said on oath and Greg might simply have been being strategically economical with the verite.
OK, he might have been lying. I've always quite admired the guy but recent events have given me the merest inkling that truth, honour and professional cycling are not necessarily compatible.
Does anybody believe his assertion, which if true makes him IMO possibly the only TDF winner to do so clean.
Incidentally, I have already discounted the well ventilated opinions of worshipers of St. Lance the Martyr that their hero won because of his superior athletic ability, work ethic and transmogrified cancer cells.
I was therefore a little surprised to hear Greg LeMond state in the Landis hearing that he had never used PEDs.This was probably not said on oath and Greg might simply have been being strategically economical with the verite.
OK, he might have been lying. I've always quite admired the guy but recent events have given me the merest inkling that truth, honour and professional cycling are not necessarily compatible.
Does anybody believe his assertion, which if true makes him IMO possibly the only TDF winner to do so clean.
Incidentally, I have already discounted the well ventilated opinions of worshipers of St. Lance the Martyr that their hero won because of his superior athletic ability, work ethic and transmogrified cancer cells.