Has anyone tried the Bigha?



"Melinda Meahan - remove TRASH to reply" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:%[email protected]...
> Mark Leuck wrote:
>
> > for a carbon fiber Trek or Cannondale. $3000 is chump
> > change at my area
bike
> > store
>
> Wow, if $3000 is chump change at your area bike store, I
> want to come and catch what people don't bother to pick up
> that falls out of their pockets.

Yeah, me too Melinda. I can't believe some of the stuff I am
reading here on ARBR. I feel like I have entered the
twilight zone.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:u4tyc.1128$Hg2.576@attbi_s04...
>
> "Lorenzo L. Love" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message news:[email protected]
> earthlink.net...
> > Mark Leuck wrote:
> > > "Lorenzo L. Love" <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > message news:[email protected]
> > > thlink.net...
> > >
> > >>Because if you didn't give a fair and impartial
> > >>review, you wouldn't
be
> > >>working for Consumer Reports for long. Consumer
> > >>Reports, because they buy the product and are not
> > >>dependent on the manufacturers for free products, can
> > >>insist on fair reviews. Who does that for recumbents?
> > >
> > >
> > > So what you are saying is anything a reviewer who
> > > receives free bikes
is
> > > meaningless?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Not completely meaningless but you have to take into
> > account that they can not be too critical or make a no
> > buy recommendation.
>
> Sure they can, first off its nearly impossible to find a
> BAD recumbent so they'd never say "don't buy this bike"
> anyway. Bicycles aren't that
complex
> of a device and any critical remarks will always be based
> on the same
things
> such as comfort, tires and mechanical things like shifters
> or brakes,
I've
> yet to see a review where they weren't critical of any
> of these
>
> Can you name one reviewer that isn't too critical and
> won't make a no buy recommendation?

Actually, Mark, Bob Bryant of RCN has gotten into
considerable trouble over the years because he has given
some slightly bad reviews to various recumbent
manufacturers. Needless to say, those of us who subscribe to
RCN have enormous respect for him because of this. I believe
he has also lost advertising revenue in that some
manufacturers (fairly major) will not advertise in his
magazine or even send him information for listing. I would
never consider buying any recumbent from such a
manufacturer. Mr. Bryant has enormous credibility with his
readership because of the stands he has taken over the
years. He is for the consumer, not the manufacturer. How
unlike Varney he is! Mr. Bryant will tell you what is good
value and why. That is why his publication is worth every
penny of the subscription price.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:LCvyc.71994$3x.36231@attbi_s54...
>
> "Larry Varney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Mark Leuck wrote:
> > > "Larry Varney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > >
> > >>brief ride on a Vision. It took all of about 15
> > >>minutes to realize that the "facts" were wrong, that
> > >>swb were not "twitchy". At least, not this one. So,
> > >>maybe others weren't either. Shortly after that ride,
> > >>I bought an Haluzak Horizon, followed by a string of
> > >>several other swb recumbents. And
guess
> > >>what? They weren't twitchy at all.
> > >
> > >
> > > Odd because while I didn't find my Vision to be
> > > twitchy I did find the Haluzak was :)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > It's odd how some people have trouble with one bike,
> > but a fairly similar one seems to be OK. I've known
> > people who could handle swb but flopped all over on a
> > lwb, and vice-versa. Which really does emphasize the
> > point that people really need to check out bikes
> > themselves, when at all possible.
>
> The twitchy part didn't really bother me, the seat did,
> when it was
reclined
> I could no longer put my feet flat on the ground like I
> could with the Vision. Another odd note is people at my
> work loved riding the Vision but can't seem to get the
> hang of my Optima Baron, I had no problems at all
> adjusting
>
> Go figure :)

The problem is that those first few minutes of riding a
recumbent are determinative. Stay on it for a few hours and
a lot of the problems go away. But that is why recumbents
are so hard to sell. Those first few minutes are
determinative.

Comfort bikes have a huge advantage here because you can
ride them right away. There is no learning curve. A
learning curve however slight is a big turn off for most
potential customers. Your Optima has a bigger learning
curve than the Vision.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Lorenzo L. Love" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Slugger wrote:
> > Any comments about it?
>
> Have we convinced you to buy one yet?

I suspect Slugger is long gone from here by now. He must
think we are all crazy as loons. Well, ARBR is not for the
faint of heart. What with Varney, Lueck, yourself and me I
think we have most likely driven everyone else away. But I
do note that gentle Melinda is still with us.

We should resolve to do this all over again every 6 months
or so just to show the rest of the world what ARBR is made
of. I wonder if Bigha could haul us into court over our
various comments about their bike. Varney has scrambled my
brains so I am going to lie down and see if this terrific
headache he has given me will ever go away.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Lorenzo L. Love" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
et... [...]
> "The poor are like foxes: they need intelligence in order
> to survive. The rich, however, have power; they don't need
> good sense." Sheri S. Tepper, Singer from the Sea

Lorenzo, you have got the greatest signatures of anyone on
this newsgroup. I agree with each and every one of them.
Where did you ever dig up these jewels of wisdom? I hope you
don't mind, but I am saving them to My Documents (via
Notepad) and I may use them myself in the future. Such
pearls of wisdom should be in all our vocabularies.

--
Regards,

Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Melinda Meahan - remove TRASH to reply" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:%[email protected]...
> Mark Leuck wrote:
>
> > for a carbon fiber Trek or Cannondale. $3000 is chump
> > change at my area
bike
> > store
>
> Wow, if $3000 is chump change at your area bike store, I
> want to come and catch what people don't bother to pick up
> that falls out of their pockets.

The most expensive bike they carried was $8,000, most
obviously weren't that high but once you get to the carbon
fiber models the price starts to skyrocket
 
"Lorenzo L. Love" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > I have never paid more than a few bucks for a wrist
> > watch either. But
that
> > is because I knew I was buying a time piece and not
> > jewelry.
> >
>
> There you have the real reason many of these people can't
> understand that the Bigha is so overpriced. $3000 just
> isn't much money to them so other criteria are more
> important. Like what color it is. The perfect Bigha
> customer.

So whats the problem then? BigHa isn't marketing to the
recumbent crowd, my guess is because the recumbent crowd is
way too small to market to anyway witnessing the demise of
several manufacturers in the last few years who
DID.
 
"Melinda Meahan - remove TRASH to reply" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]...
> Larry Varney wrote:
>
> > I think it's always dangerous to start figuring that
> > any individual knows what is best for any other
> > individual, what they should wear, what they should
> > eat, and what they should spend their money on. You
> > have judged this particular bike not to be worth the
> > money (a good value) - for you. But how can you be so
> > sure that it's not a good value for someone else? You
> > know the criteria that you're using to determine the
> > "best value", but is it the same as someone else's?
>
> That's not what I am saying. I am saying that if you spend
> $3K on that bike, a lot of what you are buying according
> to the old marketing ditty, is "sizzle" and not "steak."
> Paying a large price for "sizzle" makes something not a
> good value. That doesn't mean that some people won't
> prefer it.

Simple capitalistic principle "Price what the market will
bear". Since none of us have ridden the thing we can't
really judge if its got a lot of steak or not.
 
"Lorenzo L. Love" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> > Can you name one reviewer that isn't too critical and
> > won't make a no
buy
> > recommendation?
> >
> >
>
> Slow heavy comfort bikes aren't that complex of a device
> that you need to pay $3000 for one. Can you name one
> reviewer who pays full retail for all reviewed bikes?
>
> You's almost as adamantly defensive of the Bigha as Varney
> is. What's the Bigha to you?

As usual you can't answer the question I ask but expect
everyone to answer yours even after they have so I ask you
once again if you can name one reviewer that isn't too
critical and won't make a no buy recommendation?

I am not adamant for the bike however unlike you I will not
judge it without riding it.
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:hzyyc.14542$eu.13644@attbi_s02...
>
> "Melinda Meahan - remove TRASH to reply"
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:%[email protected]...
> > Mark Leuck wrote:
> >
> > > for a carbon fiber Trek or Cannondale. $3000 is chump
> > > change at my
area
> bike
> > > store
> >
> > Wow, if $3000 is chump change at your area bike store, I
> > want to come and catch what people don't bother to pick
> > up that falls out of their pockets.
>
> The most expensive bike they carried was $8,000, most
> obviously weren't
that
> high but once you get to the carbon fiber models the price
> starts to skyrocket

Mark, the bike shop in my hometown (now gone out of
business) simply could not sell any bike over about $600. He
had a carbon fiber road bike for around $1000. and it sat in
his shop like forever. Everyone here in town thought he was
crazy for even having such an expensive bike in his shop.
His best sellers were in the $200. to $300. range.Very many
folks after seeing his "high" prices simply went out to Wal-
Mart and got their bikes for less than $100. Such is life
here on the high prairie of southern Minnesota.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:lCyyc.86108$Ly.46773@attbi_s01...
>
> "Lorenzo L. Love" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> k.net...
> > > I have never paid more than a few bucks for a wrist
> > > watch either. But
> that
> > > is because I knew I was buying a time piece and not
> > > jewelry.
> > >
> >
> > There you have the real reason many of these people
> > can't understand that the Bigha is so overpriced. $3000
> > just isn't much money to them so other criteria are more
> > important. Like what color it is. The perfect Bigha
> > customer.
>
> So whats the problem then? BigHa isn't marketing to the
> recumbent crowd,
my
> guess is because the recumbent crowd is way too small to
> market to anyway witnessing the demise of several
> manufacturers in the last few years who
> DID.

Sorry Mark, your info about your local bike shop that
carried an $8000. bike has destroyed your relevance with me.
I simply cannot imagine such a thing. We reside on different
planets, maybe separate universes. I'll maybe catch you in
the next life - if there is a next life after death.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:EGyyc.14604$eu.6770@attbi_s02... [...]
> I am not adamant for the bike however unlike you I will
> not judge it
without
> riding it.

Nope, I can judge something without having to ride it
provided I know a few key facts about it - like weight and
price. I also need to see it too of course, but I do not
have to ride it. Every recumbent that I have ever acquired I
have not ridden prior to buying it. And my expectations have
always been dead on. That is because I read RCN and knew
what to expect.

Actual riding experience is vastly overrated.

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
This is a fascinating thread to read, and amusing as I find it there are many
questions I find have been left unanswered:

A. Is it a bad thing that there is another company trying to
get people onto bikes?

B. Is it a bad thing that there is one more recumbent bike
on the market?

C. Won't a lot of people buy the BigHa, like the ride but
decide they want something
lighter/faster/sportier/different and buy other
recumbents afterwards?

D. Is Larry Varney related to Michael Varney, well-known
physics troll?

E. Is Lorenzo Love related to Fabrizio Mazzoleni?

F. Is Ed Dolan related to George "SPOG" Hammond?
--
"A kilt opens up new possibilities."
- Gary D. Schwartz in rec.backcountry
 
"Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:DDyyc.86123$Ly.38150@attbi_s01...
>
> "Melinda Meahan - remove TRASH to reply"
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Larry Varney wrote:
> >
> > > I think it's always dangerous to start figuring that
> > > any individual
> > >knows what is best for any other individual, what they
> > > should wear,
what
> > > they should eat, and what they should spend their
> > > money on. You have judged this particular bike not to
> > > be worth the money (a
good
> > > value) - for you. But how can you be so sure that it's
> > > not a good
value
> > > for someone else? You know the criteria that you're
> > > using to determine the "best value", but is it the
> > > same as someone else's?
> >
> > That's not what I am saying. I am saying that if you
> > spend $3K on that bike, a lot of what you are buying
> > according to the old marketing ditty, is "sizzle" and
> > not "steak." Paying a large price for "sizzle" makes
> > something not a good value. That doesn't mean that some
> > people won't prefer it.
>
> Simple capitalistic principle "Price what the market will
> bear". Since
none
> of us have ridden the thing we can't really judge if its
> got a lot of
steak
> or not.

I do not think that is true at all. I can judge of
something without ever having any experience of it provided
I know a few key things about it. With respect to
recumbents, things like weight and price for instance. I do
this with most things in my life. Experience of a thing is
vastly overrated. I can simply gain knowledge of something
by pure speculation provided I have a few key facts to work
with. With respect to recumbents, I can just look at them
now and I can tell you whether I am going to like them or
not. And I can also tell whether they are good value or not
based on weight and price. None of this is rocket science
except to Varney.

"Price what the market will bear" is fine and dandy but I am
predicting along with Lorenzo that the market is not going
to be there for the Bigha. Why? Because it is too heavy and
it is too pricey. It could possibly be too heavy and still
sell if it were priced at around $1000. to $1500., but at
$3000. it is doomed. Thus spake Zarathustra!

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
"Mark South" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> This is a fascinating thread to read, and amusing as I
> find it there are
many
> questions I find have been left unanswered:
[...]
> D. Is Larry Varney related to Michael Varney, well-known
> physics troll?

I think Larry Varney is some kind of troll as he is
driving me nuts.

> E. Is Lorenzo Love related to Fabrizio Mazzoleni?

No, Lorenzo is not anything like Fabrizio. They are as
different as night and day. Fab is a light weight. Lorenzo
is one hell of a heavy hitter.

> F. Is Ed Dolan related to George "SPOG" Hammond?

I am unique in the whole universe and I am not related to
anything known to mankind. I sit at the right hand of God
and am the supreme judge of all things having to do with
ARBR. Everyone knows this!

--
Ed Dolan - Minnesota
 
Mark Leuck wrote:
> "Larry Varney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Mark Leuck wrote:
>>
>>>"Larry Varney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>brief ride on a Vision. It took all of about 15
>>>>minutes to realize that the "facts" were wrong, that
>>>>swb were not "twitchy". At least, not this one. So,
>>>>maybe others weren't either. Shortly after that ride,
>>>>I bought an Haluzak Horizon, followed by a string of
>>>>several other swb recumbents. And guess what? They
>>>>weren't twitchy at all.
>>>
>>>
>>>Odd because while I didn't find my Vision to be twitchy I
>>>did find the Haluzak was :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It's odd how some people have trouble with one bike,
>> but a fairly similar one seems to be OK. I've known
>> people who could handle swb but flopped all over on a
>> lwb, and vice-versa. Which really does emphasize the
>> point that people really need to check out bikes
>> themselves, when at all possible.
>
>
> The twitchy part didn't really bother me, the seat did,
> when it was reclined I could no longer put my feet flat on
> the ground like I could with the Vision. Another odd note
> is people at my work loved riding the Vision but can't
> seem to get the hang of my Optima Baron, I had no problems
> at all adjusting
>
> Go figure :)
>
>

Yep, I remember the tip-toe requirements of the Horizon.
One of the only times I fell on a recumbent was at a dead
stop, with one toe balanced on: loose gravel. Foot went
out, and I went down. Luckily, no damage to either the
bike or me, and no one was around to point and giggle.

--
Larry Varney Cold Spring, KY
http://home.fuse.net/larryvarney
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Larry Varney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>As stated above, I read for the overall sense of what is
>>>being said. You should try it sometime yourself. As far
>>>as I am concerned, you leave way
>
> too
>
>>>many statements just hanging unconnected to anything. So
>>>I have to make
>
> the
>
>>>connections for you. And you never come to a conclusion
>>>about anything. Consequently, many of your posts strike
>>>me as being pointless. But I am
>
> very
>
>>>good at completing other's thoughts and coming to
>>>conclusions. It is
>
> what I
>
>>>do best in life. If you do not want others doing it for
>>>you, then do it yourself.
>>>
>>>Is Bigha good value or isn't it? That is the question
>>>that Lorenzo and I would like you to answer.
>>>
>>
>> ROTFL! You may "read for the overall sense", and yet
>> you come to completely incorrect conclusions. You claim
>> I am saying something that is not to be found, not in
>> the slightest, in anything I've written. You connect
>> what I have written with things that are only in your
>> mind, and then blame ME for the result. My points are
>> always clear, and I state them, over and over again, in
>> the hopes that perhaps someday someone can help you
>> understand. You do not need to complete my thoughts on
>> this issue, Dolan, nor do you need to come to any other
>> conclusions than this: there are many criteria involved
>> in buying things, including bikes. Some criteria are
>> weighted more, some less, depending solely on the
>> individual. Do you understand, Dolan? Do I need to use
>> different words? Perhaps put it all in some sort of
>> outline?
>
>
> But you do not know how to weigh anything. You think
> perhaps that the quality of the components is the equal of
> the overall weight of the bike or of the price. That is
> why I regard you as an idiot. Also, criteria never depend
> solely on the individual. There are always universal
> criteria and if the individual does not recognize those
> universal criteria, well then the individual is an idiot -
> which you prove every time you post.
>
>

Wrong again, Dolan. I do know how to weigh the different
criteria. I just don't take the arrogant stance that *my*
subjective weighing is the only, the correct, the best
for everyone. Have I said anything remotely like the
quality of the components being the equal of the overall
weight or the price? Nope, never did - and yet, for
*something I never said or wrote*, you think I'm an
idiot. What does that make you, Dolan, for condeming me
for something I never said? And as for the "universal
criteria" - Dolan, what the hell are you talking about?
NO ONE has said there aren't criteria that would apply to
just about everything - remember, I'm the one who keeps
pointing out to you and your friend, that there are more
than two to consider - it's the relative importance of
those criteria that matter - to the individual.

>> Maybe if you thought about what I've said, and tried to
>> see if you agreed with me or not, that might help. So
>> let's hear it: do you agree, or disagree, that there
>> are many criteria involved in buying things, and that
>> different people weigh those criteria differently? Yes
>> or no, Dolan. Or do you need me to make it even
>> simpler?
>
>
> I disagree with what you have said above. You have made it
> way too subjective. There are always objective criteria
> which have nothing to do with what any individuals might
> think because individuals can think wrongly due to
> ignorance or just plain lack of knowledge. I believe that
> is what Lorenzo is saying is that Bigha will not market to
> recumbent shops and to sophisticated recumbent buyers.
> Instead they are catering to ignoramuses - and you are
> supporting this fiasco by defending Bigha the way you do.
> But you are not fooling me or anyone else here who knows
> anything about recumbents. We know that a recumbent is
> mainly a frame and wheels and that weight and price are
> important and everything else is Mickey Mouse no matter
> what some "individuals" might think is important.
>
Nonsense. There are no "objective" criteria - and I'll
take just one to illustrate it. How about price? Just
what specific dollar figure is too high? If it were
objective, there would be just one number, right? But
there isn't - it's all relative. And of course
individuals can think wrongly, due to ignorance. We see
that all the time - just look at the people who are
condeming bikes they have never seen nor ridden. How much
better an illustration of ignorance can there be? And off
again with that silliness of my "defending" the BiGHA.
There's a term for people like you, and you've been using
it quite a bit in this latest post of yours.
>
>> As for what you and Love want - which, apparently, is
>> for me to decide for you the value of the BiGHA bike -
>> why ask me? Am I the sole arbiter of worth? Do you
>> trust, or need, me to decide whether or not a
>> particular bike is a good value? If I say yes, will you
>> go out and buy one? If I say no, will you not buy one?
>
>
> But are you not a reviewer for Bike Rider Online? It is
> your duty to advise the less knowledgeable if a bike is a
> good buy or not. If you do not doing this very elementary
> thing, then you are failing in your duty as a reviewer. If
> I were Ball, I would fire you for dereliction of duty.
>
My duty? To advise people about whether or not a bike is
a good buy, *when I have already explained that I haven't
ridden it*? Only fools, morons, idiots and the ignorant
do that, Dolan - you should know that. And no, I am not a
reviewer for Bike Rider Online. But if I were, and if I
had reviewed the BiGHA, I would give my opinions as to
how it rode, what it weighed, all of the things that I
noticed about it. But "derelliction of duty" for not
giving my evaluation of a bike I've never ridden - keep
it up, Dolan, we all need a good laugh, even at the
expense of the truly stupid.
>
>> You and Love should be able to figure it all by now,
>> Dolan. It's not a difficult conclusion to come to. But,
>> just in case you really do need for me to tell you what
>> to think and what to conclude, here it is: The value of
>> anything, including the BiGHA, is determined by each
>> individual. Each individual should be able to come to a
>> decision as to whether or not it's worth the asking
>> price. This goes for bikes, trikes, horses, cars,
>> hamburgers, you name it.
>
>
> No, we have fundamental disagreement here. There are
> always universal criteria for determining the value for
> price for any product. I spent many hours as a youth
> reading Consumer's Reports and Consumer's Digest reviews
> of various products. It is not up to the individual to
> decide these things. It is up to honest reviewers who
> are expert to give the rest of us a clue as to what is
> good value and what is not good value.What does the
> average consumer know about anything when you get right
> down to it?
>
>
Again, nonsense. It is always up to the individual,
because it is the individual who pays the money and uses
the product. You may be more than willing to put your
brain in neutral and let other people do your thinking
for you, but the rest of us are not.

>> Now, if you truly do need me or anyone else to tell you
>> which is a
>> good value in any or all of these items, then you really
>> do have my pity.
>
>
> I would like you to tell me what is good value because you
> have had an opportunity to test ride various recumbents
> which I can never do. I rely on a reviewer for information
> of all kinds. This is why I have been reading RCN all
> these many years and why I don't bother with Bike Rider
> Online which I understand you are affiliated with. Why
> should I read your reviews if you are not going tell me
> what is a good buy and what is not a good buy.
>
> If you have test ridden the Bigha, now is the time to tell
> us if it is a good buy or not. Once you have told us that,
> we will know what to think of you as a reviewer.
>

Dolan, when I get a chance to ride a BiGHA - for
something more than a trip around a parking lot, of
course - all that would tell anyone is whether or not the
tires are flat - I'll let you know what you should think.
How's that?

--
Larry Varney Cold Spring, KY
http://home.fuse.net/larryvarney
 
Edward Dolan wrote:

>
> Yes I do disagree! The value is not up to the individual.
> What do individuals (the average slob consumer) know about
> anything anyway except what reviewers tell them.

Absolute ****. The value is *always* up to the individual.
Only the truly brain-dead or submissive sheep would ever
believe or have it any other way. Think for yourself!

--
Larry Varney Cold Spring, KY
http://home.fuse.net/larryvarney
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Mark Leuck" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:DDyyc.86123$Ly.38150@attbi_s01...
>
>>"Melinda Meahan - remove TRASH to reply"
>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>Larry Varney wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I think it's always dangerous to start figuring that any
>>>> individual
>>>> knows what is best for any other individual, what they
>>>> should wear,
>
> what
>
>>>>they should eat, and what they should spend their money
>>>>on. You have judged this particular bike not to be worth
>>>>the money (a
>
> good
>
>>>>value) - for you. But how can you be so sure that it's
>>>>not a good
>
> value
>
>>>>for someone else? You know the criteria that you're
>>>>using to determine the "best value", but is it the same
>>>>as someone else's?
>>>
>>>That's not what I am saying. I am saying that if you
>>>spend $3K on that bike, a lot of what you are buying
>>>according to the old marketing ditty, is "sizzle" and not
>>>"steak." Paying a large price for "sizzle" makes
>>>something not a good value. That doesn't mean that some
>>>people won't prefer it.
>>
>>Simple capitalistic principle "Price what the market will
>>bear". Since
>
> none
>
>>of us have ridden the thing we can't really judge if its
>>got a lot of
>
> steak
>
>>or not.
>
>
> I do not think that is true at all. I can judge of
> something without ever having any experience of it
> provided I know a few key things about it. With respect to
> recumbents, things like weight and price for instance. I
> do this with most things in my life. Experience of a thing
> is vastly overrated. I can simply gain knowledge of
> something by pure speculation provided I have a few key
> facts to work with. With respect to recumbents, I can just
> look at them now and I can tell you whether I am going to
> like them or not. And I can also tell whether they are
> good value or not based on weight and price. None of this
> is rocket science except to Varney.
>
> "Price what the market will bear" is fine and dandy but I
> am predicting along with Lorenzo that the market is not
> going to be there for the Bigha. Why? Because it is too
> heavy and it is too pricey. It could possibly be too heavy
> and still sell if it were priced at around $1000. to
> $1500., but at $3000. it is doomed. Thus spake
> Zarathustra!
>

OK, let's see a show of hands. How many people are going
to trust the pronouncements of Ed Dolan, who comes to his
decisions based not on actual experiences, but from
"speculation"? And how many of you agree with him that
his weighing of the criteria is the only valid one, that
if there is any disagreement, then automatically everyone
but Dolan is wrong?

--
Larry Varney Cold Spring, KY
http://home.fuse.net/larryvarney
 
Lorenzo L. Love wrote:

> I'll try again: Is the Bigha a good value for YOU? If you
> don't know, why are you so worried about people who do
> have opinions?
>
> Lorenzo L. Love

And I'll try again: I'll let you know once I've ridden
it. And other people's opinions do not have any
relationship at all to my not having ridden a BiGHA, nor
with my not having an idea as to the value of it, for me.

--
Larry Varney Cold Spring, KY
http://home.fuse.net/larryvarney
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
2
Views
635
UK and Europe
Zog The Undeniable
Z