he has gained a few

if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1

 

a bit odd, but i dont think it looks bad~

often they use stomach muscles to breath better while TT, and lance often races without a flat back.
I think thats why his TT helmet is shaped the way it is.

he does look a little funny in the photo, but its just a training photo..

Sean

"JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1

 

On 29 Jan 2003 13:21:05 -0800, [email protected] (McCoughan) wrote:

>he does look a little funny in the photo, but its just a training photo..

He does look a little funny but I bet if you put your hand in his pocket you would feel "nuts"!

Sparhawk

 

On 1/29/03 1:30 PM, in article [email protected], "Sparhawk"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On 29 Jan 2003 13:21:05 -0800, [email protected] (McCoughan) wrote:
>
>
>> he does look a little funny in the photo, but its just a training photo..
>
> He does look a little funny but I bet if you put your hand in his pocket you would feel "nuts"!
>
>
"nut" (singular!!)

> Sparhawk

 

or "nut"

"Sparhawk" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On 29 Jan 2003 13:21:05 -0800, [email protected] (McCoughan) wrote:
>
>
> >he does look a little funny in the photo, but its just a training photo..
>
> He does look a little funny but I bet if you put your hand in his pocket you would feel "nuts"!
>
>
> Sparhawk

 

"steve" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:BA5D8E26.202B1%[email protected]...
> On 1/29/03 1:30 PM, in article [email protected], "Sparhawk"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> "nut" (singular!!)
>
>
>
>
> > Sparhawk

man, thats just wrong

 

I mentioned that last year at the SFGP. Lance is getting bigger and that doesn't bode well
for climbing.

"JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1

 

In article <l1%Z9[email protected]>, "Tom Kunich"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> "JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> > if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
> >
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1

> I mentioned that last year at the SFGP. Lance is getting bigger and that doesn't bode well for
> climbing.

On the other hand, he might take the yellow and green jerseys this year
.

--
Ryan Cousineau, [email protected] http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

 

he aint doing commercials for Gillete, I guarantee that.

JTN wrote:

>if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
>
>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
>
>

 

Tom raises an interesting point. Does anyone with medical knowledge know if there are any studies
indicating a period of muscle reduction follwed by a cure of muscle gain over time, post-chemo?

Brian Lafferty

--
Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and
corporate power.--Benito Mussolini Together We Can End Violence, Exploitation and War Visit UU
PeaceWork, AFSC and True Majority http://www.uupeacework.org http://www.afsc.org
http://www.truemajority.org "Ryan Cousineau" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <l1%[email protected]>, "Tom Kunich"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > "JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> > > if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
> > >
> > > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
>
> > I mentioned that last year at the SFGP. Lance is getting bigger and that doesn't bode well for
> > climbing.
>
> On the other hand, he might take the yellow and green jerseys this year
> .
>
> --
> Ryan Cousineau, [email protected] http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

 

"JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1

Normally I ignore all the Armstrong tizzieness, but I find this hilarious: one photo of him all
bundled up on an apparently cold day (see the similar pic of Ekimov to see what I mean) starts
people hypothesizing about weight/muscle mass gain, when just a few weeks ago everybody was making a
big deal out of Armstrong's dedicated winter training which included a local 'cross race and a
duathlon (where he was looking plenty lean). Get a life, people!

Andy Coggan

 

I think it is a bad photo angle. The reports I've read about their training camp this year all say
that Lance looks to be in better shape this year than in years past.

BVB

 

We'll look at pictures and ponder weight gain and his imminent demise, but come fantasy race time he will be picked by everyone right off the bat. No question. The King ain't dead yet folks.

 

lol..

I know the guy who "wins" the race in that commercial - local cat 1. he's probably 6'4" and with
that pic in mind, thinner too..

anyways, given that cyclists are a small part of their target market, Gillete probably wouldnt want
to pay lance's commercial appearance fees..

Sean

Cycling Joe <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> he aint doing commercials for Gillete, I guarantee that.
>
> JTN wrote:
>
> >if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
> >
> >http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
> >
> >
> >

 

"Andy Coggan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> "JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> > if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
> >
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
>
> Normally I ignore all the Armstrong tizzieness, but I find this hilarious: one photo of him all
> bundled up on an apparently cold day (see the similar pic of Ekimov to see what I mean) starts
> people hypothesizing about weight/muscle mass gain, when just a few weeks ago everybody was making
> a big deal out of Armstrong's dedicated winter training which included a local 'cross race and a
> duathlon (where he was looking plenty lean). Get a life, people!

That picture didn't seem unusual and besides his arms were exposed. But when you compare Armstrong
'00 with Armstrong '02 you can see a definite body build difference. You could see the same thing in
LeMond '86 when he had arms the size of toothpicks and in '90 when he had a fairly large upper body.

Time marchs on and why should Armstrong be any different?

 

Andy Coggan wrote:
>
> "JTN" <[email protected]om> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> > if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
> >
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
>
> Normally I ignore all the Armstrong tizzieness, but I find this hilarious: one photo of him all
> bundled up on an apparently cold day (see the similar pic of Ekimov to see what I mean) starts
> people hypothesizing about weight/muscle mass gain, when just a few weeks ago everybody was making
> a big deal out of Armstrong's dedicated winter training which included a local 'cross race and a
> duathlon (where he was looking plenty lean). Get a life, people!

That was kind of what I thought.

 

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Tom
Kunich) wrote:

> "Andy Coggan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > "JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> > > if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
> > >
> > > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
> >
> > Normally I ignore all the Armstrong tizzieness, but I find this hilarious: one photo of him all
> > bundled up on an apparently cold day (see the similar pic of Ekimov to see what I mean) starts
> > people hypothesizing about weight/muscle mass gain, when just a few weeks ago everybody was
> > making a big deal out of Armstrong's dedicated winter training which included a local 'cross
> > race and a duathlon (where he was looking plenty lean). Get a life, people!
>
> That picture didn't seem unusual and besides his arms were exposed. But when you compare
> Armstrong '00 with Armstrong '02 you can see a definite body build difference. You could see the
> same thing in LeMond '86 when he had arms the size of toothpicks and in '90 when he had a fairly
> large upper body.

Huh? Are you talking about the picture in the URL above, or the 'cross race pic? In the "bundled up"
picture above, his arms are either completely bundled up, or have turned USPS-blue from the cold.

--
Ryan Cousineau, [email protected] http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

 

"JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
>
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1

I don't see the weight gain. Perhaps I'm visually impaired, but it looks to me like Lance is wearing
a camelback style hydration bladder under his jersey.

 

"Arno Granados" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
> >
> > http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
>
> I don't see the weight gain. Perhaps I'm visually impaired, but it looks to me like Lance is
> wearing a camelback style hydration bladder under his jersey.

He must have a North American Masters Racers as his new coach.

Any Masters crit rider can tell you as he's eating his 4 cheese enchiladas with rice, beans,
guacamole and sour cream, that the surest way to achieving dizzying heights of speed and fitness is
to acquire a "curvaceous" figure.

That's what I did and I can beat those wannabee D3 pros all the time in the town sprints. If I
didn't have to work all the time, I'll bet I could win a pro race here and there. Those guys are too
skinny, they can't make any power.

 

On 1/31/03 10:01 AM, in article [email protected], "William Belaforous
Kelly" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Arno Granados" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "JTN" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
>>> if this is really lance the photo didnt do him any justice.
>>>
>>> http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/?id=2003/jan03/USPS_train/cnla1
>>
>> I don't see the weight gain. Perhaps I'm visually impaired, but it looks to me like Lance is
>> wearing a camelback style hydration bladder under his jersey.
>
>
> He must have a North American Masters Racers as his new coach.
>
> Any Masters crit rider can tell you as he's eating his 4 cheese enchiladas with rice, beans,
> guacamole and sour cream,

Please...............no guacamole or sour cream thank you

I will have xtra cheese...........and you can bring me a beer when you bring my food

Thank you


that the surest way to achieving
> dizzying heights of speed and fitness is to acquire a "curvaceous" figure.
>
> That's what I did and I can beat those wannabee D3 pros all the time in the town sprints. If I
> didn't have to work all the time, I'll bet I could win a pro race here and there. Those guys are
> too skinny, they can't make any power.