Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Head tube space to relax fork angle ?

Started by Gwood · · Last activity · 5 posts · 792 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
17 October 2003
Last activity
19 October 2003
Original author
Gwood
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
792
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Some time ago I thought I read here about a product that was pretty much a spacer that went
    under the head tube. The intent was to be able to use a longer travel fork and relax the angle
    of the fork.

    I mentioned this to a buddy who has an interest in trying this. Now I can't find the reference. Can
    anybody help out ?

    Cheers Gary

  2. Gwood said:

    Some time ago I thought I read here about a product that was pretty much a spacer that went
    under the head tube. The intent was to be able to use a longer travel fork and relax the angle
    of the fork.

    I mentioned this to a buddy who has an interest in trying this. Now I can't find the reference. Can
    anybody help out ?

    I'm confused (but comfortable in that condition...). Since a longer-travel fork also relaxes the
    head tube angle, why in the world would you want to add a spacer under the head tube (aka on top of
    the fork) to relax it even more???

    Besides, I wouldn't trust anything that extended the head tube like that - there's a lot of stress
    at the bottom of the HT already, and if you cantilever that force out on an extension, the result
    will be predictable (and ugly).

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame

  3. "Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Besides, I wouldn't trust anything that extended the head tube like that - there's a lot of stress
    at the bottom of the HT already, and if you cantilever that force out on an extension, the result
    will be predictable (and ugly).


    Frame decapitation?

  4. Mojo Deluxe said:

    "Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Besides, I wouldn't trust anything that extended the head tube like that - there's a lot of
    stress at the bottom of the HT already, and if you cantilever that force out on an extension, the
    result will be predictable (and ugly).


    Frame decapitation?

    Quite possible. About the best that would happen would be the lower head tube boring would get all
    rounded out from the force. The worst would be a head tube failure outright - but either way, you'd
    probably be looking for a new frame.

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame

  5. "Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mojo Deluxe said:

    "Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    Besides, I wouldn't trust anything that extended the head tube like that - there's a lot of
    stress at the bottom of the HT already, and if you cantilever that force out on an extension,
    the result will be predictable (and ugly).


    Frame decapitation?

    Quite possible. About the best that would happen would be the lower head tube boring would get all
    rounded out from the force. The worst would be a head tube failure outright - but either way,
    you'd probably be looking for a new frame.


    My Voodoo Wanga got pretty slack in the head tube. When my OEM headset started to fail, I replaced
    it with a King, and it almost dropped in. I imagine the 853 head tube on my new frame will hold up
    better. Not 100% sure, but I think it's been hardened, or heat treated.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.