I just wondered, with all this talk about helmets not having any
positive benefit, if there had been any collation of the type of head
injury deaths or serious injuries most prevalent since their compulsory
introduction in certain countries as marked against the type of head
injury deaths/injuries before.
I.E.
Had rotational injuries causing death or serious injury increased,
decreased or stayed the same?
If there was no significant drop in other fatal or serious head injuries
it would then be shown that wearing helmets was in fact more dangerous
than not. This would be a difficult statistic to argue against if one
then wanted to introduce compulsion.
Still they probably don't collate figures like this because of that very
reason.
Just wondered.
Sniper8052