Even if his head had been run over by a truck?LindaNo1 said:No, it isn't. If HE worked here, I could forgive him ANYTHING. Yum, yum ...
Even if his head had been run over by a truck?LindaNo1 said:No, it isn't. If HE worked here, I could forgive him ANYTHING. Yum, yum ...
wheelist said:Even if his head had been run over by a truck?
Beanie hats are unforgivable.LindaNo1 said:No, it isn't. If HE worked here, I could forgive him ANYTHING. Yum, yum ...
Don Shipp[I said:You must be mad not to wear a helmet". [/I]
My choice is to cycle without a helmet.
My thoughts exacly .... before I took my third spill.Don Shipp said:Beanie hats are unforgivable.
Chinstrap beards are unforgivable.
Helmets are a matter of choice, like cycling itself. Some people say "You must be mad to cycle". Some cyclists say "You must be mad not to wear a helmet".
My choice is to cycle without a helmet.
astroluc said:I wear a helmet on the road; I do not usually when I ride my MTB... I go faster on the road, and although there are trees off road, they don't cut you off...
Fine for you. If you have children, do you make them wear a helmet? Do you make them put a seatbelt on in the car? Do you buy cars because they have airbags/ABS etc? There are few things more dangerous than riding a bicycle in traffic, and wearing a helmet seems to be one way of gaining some protection.Don Shipp said:Beanie hats are unforgivable.
Chinstrap beards are unforgivable.
Helmets are a matter of choice, like cycling itself. Some people say "You must be mad to cycle". Some cyclists say "You must be mad not to wear a helmet".
My choice is to cycle without a helmet.
I have children who do not have much interest in cycling. If they do ever develop an enthusiasm for it, I will make sure that they are competent to ride in traffic, and let them decide whether they want to wear a helmet or not.Balderick said:Fine for you. If you have children, do you make them wear a helmet? Do you make them put a seatbelt on in the car? Do you buy cars because they have airbags/ABS etc? There are few things more dangerous than riding a bicycle in traffic, and wearing a helmet seems to be one way of gaining some protection.
Not wanting to start English/Australian war (after all, it seems likely you will win the Ashes in the *yawn* cricket), but is the aversion to wearing a helmet an English/British thing? A mate from work is English (and the b*astard is wearing his 2003 World Cup Rugby jersey today, just because of the cricket) and he tells me there was also strong resistance to riding with lights at night (and that intially the flashing lights were unlawful). Seems as daft as the US resistance to wearing seatbelts in cars.
Don Shipp said:I have children who do not have much interest in cycling. If they do ever develop an enthusiasm for it, I will make sure that they are competent to ride in traffic, and let them decide whether they want to wear a helmet or not.
Riding a bike is obviously much more hazardous in Oz and in parts of America than I find it to be in London.
I doubt riding in London is more or less risky than riding a bike in other major cities, including those in Australia or parts of the US. I suspect riding a bike where I live is considerably less risky than riding in the London CBD.Don Shipp said:I have children who do not have much interest in cycling. If they do ever develop an enthusiasm for it, I will make sure that they are competent to ride in traffic, and let them decide whether they want to wear a helmet or not.
Riding a bike is obviously much more hazardous in Oz and in parts of America than I find it to be in London.
complience said:theres more chance of you being hit a car when you walk to the shops..
however i dont see any of you suggesting we wear a helmets when we do that.
you are all tools of helmet manufacturers.
I would never do anything so stupid and dangerous as to get out of a perfectly good plane until it had landed and stopped moving.Insight Driver said:Following your logic, do us a favor will you? Take up skydiving, but don't use a backup 'chute because it's just extra weight you don't need.
The postings by some Aussies make cycling down under sound very hazardous indeed. Ditto some Yanks.Balderick said:I doubt riding in London is more or less risky than riding a bike in other major cities, including those in Australia or parts of the US. I suspect riding a bike where I live is considerably less risky than riding in the London CBD.
I have no doubt I am competent riding a bike in traffic, but like all people I can make mistakes, have errors in judgement or can suffer unexpected mechanical failure. I have no doubt wearing a helmet increases my safety if I am unfortunate enough to be in an accident, which may be the result of someone else. Defensive riding only protects you to a point. But good luck to you - you may well need it.
One final question 0 are you a member of the CTC?
No Darwin award for me, I have already passed on my genes. My dad never wore a helmet either, and he's still alive.Geoff2010 said:I believe there is only one tool here. All I have to say is "natural selection"... and if you keep up that attitude, you will definitely not be "selected". It truly is the way life tries to keep the gene pool clean
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.